* [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist
@ 2020-08-21 17:03 Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-08-21 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c; +Cc: Andy Shevchenko
When commit c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case
as well") fixed the enumeration of I²C devices on ACPI enabled platforms
when driver has no ID table, it missed the PRP0001 support.
i2c_device_match() and i2c_acpi_match_device() differently match
driver against given device. Use acpi_driver_match_device(), that is used
in the former, in i2c_device_probe() and don't fail PRP0001 enumeration
when no ID table exist.
Fixes: c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case as well")
BugLink: https://stackoverflow.com/q/63519678/2511795
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index 34a9609f256d..5ec082e2039d 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
* or ACPI ID table is supplied for the probing device.
*/
if (!driver->id_table &&
- !i2c_acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, client) &&
+ !acpi_driver_match_device(dev, dev->driver) &&
!i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
status = -ENODEV;
goto put_sync_adapter;
--
2.28.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device()
2020-08-21 17:03 [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-08-21 17:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-24 8:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-24 8:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-08-21 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c; +Cc: Andy Shevchenko
We have no users of i2c_acpi_match_device() anymore and seems
will not have them in the future, thus remove dead code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 10 ----------
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
index 2ade99b105b9..e627d7b2790f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
@@ -276,16 +276,6 @@ void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
dev_warn(&adap->dev, "failed to enumerate I2C slaves\n");
}
-const struct acpi_device_id *
-i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
- struct i2c_client *client)
-{
- if (!(client && matches))
- return NULL;
-
- return acpi_match_device(matches, &client->dev);
-}
-
static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_acpi_force_400khz_device_ids[] = {
/*
* These Silead touchscreen controllers only work at 400KHz, for
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
index 94ff1693b391..8ce261167a2d 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
@@ -59,20 +59,11 @@ static inline int __i2c_check_suspended(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-const struct acpi_device_id *
-i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
- struct i2c_client *client);
void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client);
#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
static inline void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
-static inline const struct acpi_device_id *
-i2c_acpi_match_device(const struct acpi_device_id *matches,
- struct i2c_client *client)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
{
--
2.28.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist
2020-08-21 17:03 [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-08-24 8:41 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2020-08-24 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-acpi, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:03:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When commit c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case
> as well") fixed the enumeration of I²C devices on ACPI enabled platforms
> when driver has no ID table, it missed the PRP0001 support.
>
> i2c_device_match() and i2c_acpi_match_device() differently match
> driver against given device. Use acpi_driver_match_device(), that is used
> in the former, in i2c_device_probe() and don't fail PRP0001 enumeration
> when no ID table exist.
>
> Fixes: c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case as well")
> BugLink: https://stackoverflow.com/q/63519678/2511795
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device()
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-08-24 8:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2020-08-24 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-acpi, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:03:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have no users of i2c_acpi_match_device() anymore and seems
> will not have them in the future, thus remove dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist
2020-08-21 17:03 [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-24 8:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Mika Westerberg
@ 2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-25 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-08-25 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, linux-i2c
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:03:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When commit c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case
> as well") fixed the enumeration of I²C devices on ACPI enabled platforms
> when driver has no ID table, it missed the PRP0001 support.
>
> i2c_device_match() and i2c_acpi_match_device() differently match
> driver against given device. Use acpi_driver_match_device(), that is used
> in the former, in i2c_device_probe() and don't fail PRP0001 enumeration
> when no ID table exist.
>
> Fixes: c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case as well")
> BugLink: https://stackoverflow.com/q/63519678/2511795
You are monitoring SO? Nice.
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device()
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-24 8:42 ` Mika Westerberg
@ 2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2020-08-25 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, linux-i2c
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 302 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:03:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have no users of i2c_acpi_match_device() anymore and seems
> will not have them in the future, thus remove dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Applied to for-current, thanks!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2020-08-25 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-08-25 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, linux-acpi, linux-i2c
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:23:14AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:03:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > When commit c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case
> > as well") fixed the enumeration of I²C devices on ACPI enabled platforms
> > when driver has no ID table, it missed the PRP0001 support.
> >
> > i2c_device_match() and i2c_acpi_match_device() differently match
> > driver against given device. Use acpi_driver_match_device(), that is used
> > in the former, in i2c_device_probe() and don't fail PRP0001 enumeration
> > when no ID table exist.
> >
> > Fixes: c64ffff7a9d1 ("i2c: core: Allow empty id_table in ACPI case as well")
> > BugLink: https://stackoverflow.com/q/63519678/2511795
>
> You are monitoring SO? Nice.
Monitoring is probably too strong word here, rather sometimes looking for
interesting topics (mostly related to ACPI + Linux (kernel) and near to them).
This makes me wonder how many commits are actually referring to SO.
The 1st one I found is 8c88f87cb27a ("netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: add NAT TCP
sequence adjustment if packet mangled"). Some of them referring stackexchange
site, but not many (brief estimation like a couple of dozens at most).
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> Applied to for-current, thanks!
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-25 10:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-21 17:03 [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-21 17:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] i2c: acpi: Remove dead code, i.e. i2c_acpi_match_device() Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-24 8:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-24 8:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: core: Don't fail PRP0001 enumeration when no ID table exist Mika Westerberg
2020-08-25 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-25 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).