linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 01/27] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2020 10:19:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205181935.3712-2-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205181935.3712-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>

Explain no_cet_shstk/no_cet_ibt kernel parameters, and introduce a new
document on Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET).

Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   6 +
 Documentation/x86/index.rst                   |   1 +
 Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst               | 294 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 301 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index ade4e6ec23e0..8b69ebf0baed 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3001,6 +3001,12 @@
 			noexec=on: enable non-executable mappings (default)
 			noexec=off: disable non-executable mappings
 
+	no_cet_shstk	[X86-64] Disable Shadow Stack for user-mode
+			applications
+
+	no_cet_ibt	[X86-64] Disable Indirect Branch Tracking for user-mode
+			applications
+
 	nosmap		[X86,PPC]
 			Disable SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention)
 			even if it is supported by processor.
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/index.rst b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
index a8de2fbc1caa..81f919801765 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ x86-specific Documentation
    tlb
    mtrr
    pat
+   intel_cet
    intel_mpx
    intel-iommu
    intel_txt
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst b/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..71e2462fea5c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_cet.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=========================================
+Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
+=========================================
+
+[1] Overview
+============
+
+Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) provides protection against
+return/jump-oriented programming (ROP) attacks.  It can be setup to
+protect both applications and the kernel.  In the first phase, only
+user-mode protection is implemented in the 64-bit kernel; 32-bit
+applications are supported in compatibility mode.
+
+CET introduces Shadow Stack (SHSTK) and Indirect Branch Tracking
+(IBT).  SHSTK is a secondary stack allocated from memory and cannot
+be directly modified by applications.  When executing a CALL, the
+processor pushes a copy of the return address to SHSTK.  Upon
+function return, the processor pops the SHSTK copy and compares it
+to the one from the program stack.  If the two copies differ, the
+processor raises a control-protection fault.  IBT verifies indirect
+CALL/JMP targets are intended as marked by the compiler with 'ENDBR'
+opcodes (see CET instructions below).
+
+There are two kernel configuration options:
+
+    X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER, and
+    X86_INTEL_BRANCH_TRACKING_USER.
+
+To build a CET-enabled kernel, Binutils v2.31 and GCC v8.1 or later
+are required.  To build a CET-enabled application, GLIBC v2.28 or
+later is also required.
+
+There are two command-line options for disabling CET features::
+
+    no_cet_shstk - disables SHSTK, and
+    no_cet_ibt   - disables IBT.
+
+At run time, /proc/cpuinfo shows the availability of SHSTK and IBT.
+
+[2] CET assembly instructions
+=============================
+
+RDSSP %r
+    Read the SHSTK pointer into %r.
+
+INCSSP %r
+    Unwind (increment) the SHSTK pointer (0 ~ 255) steps as indicated
+    in the operand register.  The GLIBC longjmp uses INCSSP to unwind
+    the SHSTK until that matches the program stack.  When it is
+    necessary to unwind beyond 255 steps, longjmp divides and repeats
+    the process.
+
+RSTORSSP (%r)
+    Switch to the SHSTK indicated in the 'restore token' pointed by
+    the operand register and replace the 'restore token' with a new
+    token to be saved (with SAVEPREVSSP) for the outgoing SHSTK.
+
+::
+
+                                Before RSTORSSP
+
+               Incoming SHSTK                 Current/Outgoing SHSTK
+
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+   addr=x |                      |     ssp-> |                      |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+   (%r)-> | rstor_token=(x|Lg)   |  addr=y-8 |                      |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+
+                                After RSTORSSP
+
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+   addr=x |                      |           |                      |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+    ssp-> | rstor_token=(y|Pv|Lg)|  addr=y-8 |                      |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+
+    note:
+        1. Only valid addresses and restore tokens can be on the
+           user-mode SHSTK.
+        2. A token is always of type u64 and must align to u64.
+        3. The incoming SHSTK pointer in a rstor_token must point to
+           immediately above the token.
+        4. 'Lg' is bit[0] of a rstor_token indicating a 64-bit SHSTK.
+        5. 'Pv' is bit[1] of a rstor_token indicating the token is to
+           be used only for the next SAVEPREVSSP and invalid for
+           RSTORSSP.
+
+SAVEPREVSSP
+    Pop the SHSTK 'restore token' pointed by current SHSTK pointer
+    and store it at (previous SHSTK pointer - 8).
+
+::
+
+                               After SAVEPREVSSP
+
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+    ssp-> |                      |           |                      |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+ addr=x-8 | rstor_token=(y|Pv|Lg)|  addr=y-8 | rstor_token(y|Lg)    |
+          |----------------------|           |----------------------|
+
+WRUSS %r0, (%r1)
+    Write the value in %r0 to the SHSTK address pointed by (%r1).
+    This is a kernel-mode only instruction.
+
+ENDBR and NOTRACK prefix
+    When IBT is enabled, an indirect CALL/JMP must either::
+
+        have a NOTRACK prefix,
+        reach an ENDBR, or
+        reach an address within a legacy code page;
+
+    or it results in a control-protection fault.
+
+    When the target address is derived from information that cannot
+    be modified, the compiler uses the NOTRACK prefix.  In other
+    cases, the compiler inserts an ENDBR at the target address.
+
+    A legacy code page is designated in the legacy code bitmap, which
+    is explained below in section [8].
+
+[3] Application Enabling
+========================
+
+An application's CET capability is marked in its ELF header and can
+be verified from the following command output, in the
+NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 field:
+
+    readelf -n <application>
+
+If an application supports CET and is statically linked, it will run
+with CET protection.  If the application needs any shared libraries,
+the loader checks all dependencies and enables CET only when all
+requirements are met.
+
+[4] Legacy Libraries
+====================
+
+GLIBC provides a few tunables for backward compatibility.
+
+GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.tune.hwcaps=-SHSTK,-IBT
+    Turn off SHSTK/IBT for the current shell.
+
+GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.tune.x86_shstk=<on, permissive>
+    This controls how dlopen() handles SHSTK legacy libraries::
+
+        on         - continue with SHSTK enabled;
+        permissive - continue with SHSTK off.
+
+[5] CET system calls
+====================
+
+The following arch_prctl() system calls are added for CET:
+
+arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_STATUS, unsigned long *addr)
+    Return CET feature status.
+
+    The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer.
+    On returning to the caller, the kernel fills the following
+    information::
+
+        *addr       = SHSTK/IBT status
+        *(addr + 1) = SHSTK base address
+        *(addr + 2) = SHSTK size
+
+arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE, unsigned long features)
+    Disable SHSTK and/or IBT specified in 'features'.  Return -EPERM
+    if CET is locked.
+
+arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_LOCK)
+    Lock in CET feature.
+
+arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_ALLOC_SHSTK, unsigned long *addr)
+    Allocate a new SHSTK and put a restore token at top.
+
+    The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer and indicates
+    the desired SHSTK size to allocate.  On returning to the caller,
+    the kernel fills '*addr' with the base address of the new SHSTK.
+
+arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_MARK_LEGACY_CODE, unsigned long *addr)
+    Mark an address range as IBT legacy code.
+
+    The parameter 'addr' is a pointer to a user buffer that has the
+    following information::
+
+        *addr       = starting linear address of the legacy code
+        *(addr + 1) = size of the legacy code
+        *(addr + 2) = set (1); clear (0)
+
+Note:
+  There is no CET-enabling arch_prctl function.  By design, CET is
+  enabled automatically if the binary and the system can support it.
+
+  The parameters passed are always unsigned 64-bit.  When an IA32
+  application passing pointers, it should only use the lower 32 bits.
+
+[6] The implementation of the SHSTK
+===================================
+
+SHSTK size
+----------
+
+A task's SHSTK is allocated from memory to a fixed size of
+RLIMIT_STACK.  A compat-mode thread's SHSTK size is 1/4 of
+RLIMIT_STACK.  The smaller 32-bit thread SHSTK allows more threads to
+share a 32-bit address space.
+
+Signal
+------
+
+The main program and its signal handlers use the same SHSTK.  Because
+the SHSTK stores only return addresses, a large SHSTK will cover the
+condition that both the program stack and the sigaltstack run out.
+
+The kernel creates a restore token at the SHSTK restoring address and
+verifies that token when restoring from the signal handler.
+
+IBT for signal delivering and sigreturn is the same as the main
+program's setup; except for WAIT_ENDBR status, which can be read from
+MSR_IA32_U_CET.  In general, a task is in WAIT_ENDBR after an
+indirect CALL/JMP and before the next instruction starts.
+
+A task's WAIT_ENDBR is reset for its signal handler, but preserved on
+the task's stack; and then restored from sigreturn.
+
+Fork
+----
+
+The SHSTK's vma has VM_SHSTK flag set; its PTEs are required to be
+read-only and dirty.  When a SHSTK PTE is not present, RO, and dirty,
+a SHSTK access triggers a page fault with an additional SHSTK bit set
+in the page fault error code.
+
+When a task forks a child, its SHSTK PTEs are copied and both the
+parent's and the child's SHSTK PTEs are cleared of the dirty bit.
+Upon the next SHSTK access, the resulting SHSTK page fault is handled
+by page copy/re-use.
+
+When a pthread child is created, the kernel allocates a new SHSTK for
+the new thread.
+
+Setjmp/Longjmp
+--------------
+
+Longjmp unwinds SHSTK until it matches the program stack.
+
+Ucontext
+--------
+
+In GLIBC, getcontext/setcontext is implemented in similar way as
+setjmp/longjmp.
+
+When makecontext creates a new ucontext, a new SHSTK is allocated for
+that context with ARCH_X86_CET_ALLOC_SHSTK syscall.  The kernel
+creates a restore token at the top of the new SHSTK and the user-mode
+code switches to the new SHSTK with the RSTORSSP instruction.
+
+[7] The management of read-only & dirty PTEs for SHSTK
+======================================================
+
+A RO and dirty PTE exists in the following cases:
+
+(a) A page is modified and then shared with a fork()'ed child;
+(b) A R/O page that has been COW'ed;
+(c) A SHSTK page.
+
+The processor only checks the dirty bit for (c).  To prevent the use
+of non-SHSTK memory as SHSTK, we use a spare bit of the 64-bit PTE as
+DIRTY_SW for (a) and (b) above.  This results to the following PTE
+settings::
+
+    Modified PTE:             (R/W + DIRTY_HW)
+    Modified and shared PTE:  (R/O + DIRTY_SW)
+    R/O PTE, COW'ed:          (R/O + DIRTY_SW)
+    SHSTK PTE:                (R/O + DIRTY_HW)
+    SHSTK PTE, COW'ed:        (R/O + DIRTY_HW)
+    SHSTK PTE, shared:        (R/O + DIRTY_SW)
+
+Note that DIRTY_SW is only used in R/O PTEs but not R/W PTEs.
+
+[8] The implementation of IBT legacy bitmap
+===========================================
+
+When IBT is active, a non-IBT-capable legacy library can be executed
+if its address ranges are specified in the legacy code bitmap.  The
+bitmap covers the whole user-space address, which is TASK_SIZE_MAX
+for 64-bit and TASK_SIZE for IA32, and its each bit indicates a 4-KB
+legacy code page.  It is read-only from an application, and setup by
+the kernel as a special mapping when the first time the application
+calls arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_MARK_LEGACY_CODE).  The application
+manages the bitmap through the arch_prctl.
-- 
2.21.0

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-05 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05 18:19 [RFC PATCH v9 00/27] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
2020-02-06  0:16   ` [RFC PATCH v9 01/27] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Randy Dunlap
     [not found]     ` <af5ee976-3b57-4afe-6304-fcab8de45c77-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-02-06 20:17       ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:02   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-28 15:55     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-26 17:57   ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 17:00     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-03-09 17:21       ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 19:27         ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-03-09 19:35           ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 19:50             ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-09 20:16               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-09 20:54                 ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-09 20:59                   ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 21:12                     ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-09 22:02                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-09 22:19                       ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 23:11                         ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-09 23:20                           ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-09 23:51                             ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-09 23:59                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-10  0:08                                 ` H.J. Lu
2020-03-10  1:21                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-03-10  2:13                                     ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 03/27] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:04   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 04/27] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:06   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 17:10   ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-05 20:44     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 06/27] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for Shadow Stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:07   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 18:07   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 07/27] Add guard pages around a Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:11   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 18:17   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 08/27] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:12   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 18:20   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 10/27] x86/mm: Update pte_modify, pmd_modify, and _PAGE_CHG_MASK for _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-26 22:02   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 11/27] drm/i915/gvt: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:13   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 22:04   ` Dave Hansen
2020-04-03 15:42     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 13/27] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:16   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 22:47   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 14/27] mm: Handle Shadow Stack page fault Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:20   ` Kees Cook
2020-03-05 18:30     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-27  0:08   ` Dave Hansen
2020-04-07 18:14     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-04-07 22:21       ` Dave Hansen
2020-04-08 18:18         ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 15/27] mm: Handle THP/HugeTLB " Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:59   ` Kees Cook
2020-03-13 22:00     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 16/27] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-27  0:34   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 17/27] x86/cet/shstk: User-mode Shadow Stack support Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:07   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-27  0:55   ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 18/27] x86/cet/shstk: Introduce WRUSS instruction Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:10   ` Kees Cook
2020-03-05 18:39     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 19/27] x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:17   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 20/27] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 22/27] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:20   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 23/27] ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property() Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 24/27] x86/cet/shstk: ELF header parsing for Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:22   ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 25/27] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread " Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:29   ` Kees Cook
2020-03-25 21:51     ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 26/27] mm/mmap: Add Shadow Stack pages to memory accounting Yu-cheng Yu
     [not found] ` <20200205181935.3712-1-yu-cheng.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 02/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:02     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 05/27] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack protection Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:07     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 17:03     ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-26 19:57       ` Pavel Machek
2020-03-05 20:38       ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-26 18:05     ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-27  1:02       ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-27  1:16         ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-27  2:11           ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-27  3:57             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-02-27 18:03               ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-06 18:37       ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-03-06 19:02         ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-06 21:16           ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 09/27] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:12     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 21:35     ` Dave Hansen
2020-04-01 19:08       ` Yu-cheng Yu
2020-04-01 19:22         ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 12/27] x86/mm: Modify ptep_set_wrprotect and pmdp_set_wrprotect for _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 20:14     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 22:20     ` Dave Hansen
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 21/27] binfmt_elf: Define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:18     ` Kees Cook
2020-02-05 18:19   ` [RFC PATCH v9 27/27] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for Shadow Stack Yu-cheng Yu
2020-02-25 21:31 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/27] Control-flow Enforcement: " Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200205181935.3712-2-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    --to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).