From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range()
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:16:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310462166-31469-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462166-31469-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
__get_free_all_memory_range() walks memblock, calculates free memory
areas and fills in the specified range. It can be easily replaced
with for_each_free_mem_range().
Convert free_low_memory_core_early() and
add_highpages_with_active_regions() to for_each_free_mem_range().
This leaves __get_free_all_memory_range() without any user. Kill it
and related functions.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 3 --
arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 28 +++++++-----------
arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 59 ---------------------------------------
mm/nobootmem.c | 28 ++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 6c72eca..bc9e44b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -5,9 +5,6 @@
void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
-struct range;
-int __get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **range, int nodeid,
- unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index 29f7c6d..a631a57 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -427,23 +427,17 @@ static void __init add_one_highpage_init(struct page *page)
void __init add_highpages_with_active_regions(int nid,
unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
{
- struct range *range;
- int nr_range;
- int i;
-
- nr_range = __get_free_all_memory_range(&range, nid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++) {
- struct page *page;
- int node_pfn;
-
- for (node_pfn = range[i].start; node_pfn < range[i].end;
- node_pfn++) {
- if (!pfn_valid(node_pfn))
- continue;
- page = pfn_to_page(node_pfn);
- add_one_highpage_init(page);
- }
+ phys_addr_t start, end;
+ u64 i;
+
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, &start, &end, NULL) {
+ unsigned long pfn = clamp_t(unsigned long, PFN_UP(start),
+ start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ unsigned long e_pfn = clamp_t(unsigned long, PFN_DOWN(end),
+ start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ for ( ; pfn < e_pfn; pfn++)
+ if (pfn_valid(pfn))
+ add_one_highpage_init(pfn_to_page(pfn));
}
}
#else
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 0e8442a..4107c1a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -30,65 +30,6 @@ static __init struct range *find_range_array(int count)
return range;
}
-static void __init memblock_x86_subtract_reserved(struct range *range, int az)
-{
- u64 final_start, final_end;
- struct memblock_region *r;
-
- /* Take out region array itself at first*/
- memblock_free_reserved_regions();
-
- memblock_dbg("Subtract (%ld early reservations)\n", memblock.reserved.cnt);
-
- for_each_memblock(reserved, r) {
- memblock_dbg(" [%010llx-%010llx]\n", (u64)r->base, (u64)r->base + r->size - 1);
- final_start = PFN_DOWN(r->base);
- final_end = PFN_UP(r->base + r->size);
- if (final_start >= final_end)
- continue;
- subtract_range(range, az, final_start, final_end);
- }
-
- /* Put region array back ? */
- memblock_reserve_reserved_regions();
-}
-
-static int __init count_early_node_map(int nodeid)
-{
- int i, cnt = 0;
-
- for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nodeid, NULL, NULL, NULL)
- cnt++;
- return cnt;
-}
-
-int __init __get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **rangep, int nodeid,
- unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
-{
- int count;
- struct range *range;
- int nr_range;
-
- count = (memblock.reserved.cnt + count_early_node_map(nodeid)) * 2;
-
- range = find_range_array(count);
- nr_range = 0;
-
- /*
- * Use early_node_map[] and memblock.reserved.region to get range array
- * at first
- */
- nr_range = add_from_early_node_map(range, count, nr_range, nodeid);
- subtract_range(range, count, 0, start_pfn);
- subtract_range(range, count, end_pfn, -1ULL);
-
- memblock_x86_subtract_reserved(range, count);
- nr_range = clean_sort_range(range, count);
-
- *rangep = range;
- return nr_range;
-}
-
static u64 __init __memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit, bool get_free)
{
int i, count;
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index 2037a8a..7075bc0 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -108,21 +108,25 @@ static void __init __free_pages_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(int nodeid)
{
- int i;
- u64 start, end;
unsigned long count = 0;
- struct range *range = NULL;
- int nr_range;
-
- nr_range = __get_free_all_memory_range(&range, nodeid, 0, max_low_pfn);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++) {
- start = range[i].start;
- end = range[i].end;
- count += end - start;
- __free_pages_memory(start, end);
+ phys_addr_t start, end;
+ u64 i;
+
+ /* free reserved array temporarily so that it's treated as free area */
+ memblock_free_reserved_regions();
+
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL) {
+ unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_UP(start);
+ unsigned long end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long,
+ PFN_DOWN(end), max_low_pfn);
+ if (start_pfn < end_pfn) {
+ __free_pages_memory(start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ count += end_pfn - start_pfn;
+ }
}
+ /* put region array back? */
+ memblock_reserve_reserved_regions();
return count;
}
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-12 9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:43 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 1:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 9:44 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:46 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 21:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27 0:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27 8:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13 3:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 19:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 5:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-15 5:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310462166-31469-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).