From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:46:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110714094603.GH3455@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462166-31469-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
From 6839454ae63f1eb21e515c10229ca95c22955fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:17 +0200
Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option so that it can be handled
together with other MEMBLOCK options.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
Nothing really changed. Just patch context update to resolve conflict
from updates earlier in the series.
Thanks.
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 2 --
include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +-
mm/Kconfig | 3 +++
mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 97f0894..28116d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config X86
select HAVE_KPROBES
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
+ select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 17a882e..bc56670 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
#ifndef _X86_MEMBLOCK_H
#define _X86_MEMBLOCK_H
-#define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
-
void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 31def58..2491355 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_region_reserved_end_pfn(const struct memblo
region++)
-#ifdef ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
#define __init_memblock __meminit
#define __initdata_memblock __meminitdata
#else
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 30a5d47..7c56971 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ config HAVE_MEMBLOCK
config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
boolean
+config ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
+ boolean
+
# eventually, we can have this option just 'select SPARSEMEM'
config MEMORY_HOTPLUG
bool "Allow for memory hot-add"
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index c4a8750..ebc6119 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static int __init early_memblock(char *p)
}
early_param("memblock", early_memblock);
-#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && !defined(ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK)
+#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK)
static int memblock_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
{
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-14 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-12 9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:43 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 1:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 9:44 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-12 9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 21:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27 0:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27 8:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13 3:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 19:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15 5:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-15 5:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110714094603.GH3455@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).