linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG]  "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:08:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306343335.21578.65.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306272750.2497.79.camel@laptop>

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 19:13 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Peter,
> > 
> > I've experienced all kind of lock-ups on ARM SMP platforms recently, and
> > finally tracked it down to the following patch:
> > 
> > e4a52bcb9a18142d79e231b6733cabdbf2e67c1f [sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()].
> > 
> > Even on moderate load, the machine locks up, often silently, and
> > sometimes with a few messages like:
> > INFO: rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} (detected by 1, t=12002 jiffies)
> > 
> > Another side effect of this patch is that the load average is always 0,
> > whatever load I throw at the system.
> > 
> > Reverting the sched changes up to that patch (included) gives me a
> > working system again, which happily survives parallel kernel
> > compilations without complaining.
> > 
> > My knowledge of the scheduler being rather limited, I haven't been able
> > to pinpoint the exact problem (though it probably have something to do
> > with __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW being defined on ARM). The enclosed
> > patch somehow papers over the load average problem, but the system ends
> > up locking up anyway:
> 
> Hurm.. I'll try and make x86 use __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW, IIRC
> Ingo once said that that is possible and try to see if I can reproduce.
> No clear ideas atm.

So I checked out that particular commit and build with the below patch
on-top. grep __ARCH_WANT /proc/sched_debug did indeed return those
strings so I'm assuming CPP did its magic and I'm indeed running a
kernel that enables IRQs around context switches.

The sad news however is that a make -j8 (on a dual core) seems to result
in a kernel image, not an oops. 

Ooh, shiny, whilst typing this I got an NMI-watchdog error reporting me
that CPU1 got stuck in try_to_wake_up(), so it looks like I can indeed
reproduce some funnies.

/me goes dig in.

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/system.h |    2 ++
 kernel/sched_debug.c          |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
index 12569e6..56103bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
 
+#define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+
 /* entries in ARCH_DLINFO: */
 #if defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) || !defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
 # define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH 2
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 3669bec6..18b4ace 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -335,6 +335,13 @@ static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		(int)strcspn(init_utsname()->version, " "),
 		init_utsname()->version);
 
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
+	SEQ_printf(m, "__ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW\n");
+#endif
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+	SEQ_printf(m, "__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW\n");                                  
+#endif
+
 #define P(x) \
 	SEQ_printf(m, "%-40s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(x))
 #define PN(x) \

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-25 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 18:13 [BUG] "sched: Remove rq->lock from the first half of ttwu()" locks up on ARM Marc Zyngier
2011-05-24 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-24 21:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 12:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-25 17:08   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-25 21:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26  7:29       ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-26 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 11:02           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 11:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:21               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:26                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 12:31                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 12:37                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 12:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 13:36                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-26 14:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-27 12:06                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:55                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-27 19:41                           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-27 20:52                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-28 13:13                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 11:08                               ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:22                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 13:37                                   ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 13:52                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31 14:08                                       ` Michal Simek
2011-05-31 14:29                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-29 10:21                             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 12:01                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29 13:19                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-05-29 21:21                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-05-29  9:51                           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-06-06 10:29                           ` Pavel Machek
2011-05-26 14:56                 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 15:45                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 15:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:09                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 16:20                       ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:32                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-27  8:01                           ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 16:22                       ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-26 17:04                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-26 17:17                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:23                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 17:49                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-27  7:01                             ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-27 15:23                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-05-27 15:29                               ` Marc Zyngier
2011-05-27 15:30                                 ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306343335.21578.65.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).