linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] decouple platform_device from omap_device
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:52:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311292338-11830-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> (raw)

Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.

The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
misc. omap_device cleanups that make the last patch cleaner and
clearer.  It's really the last patch that does the decoupling.

This will be necessary if we're going to decouple the platform_device
creation from the omap_device/omap_hwmod creation etc.  This patch
leaves them both done in omap_device_build(), but shows that they can
be decoupled.


Kevin Hilman (7):
  OMAP: omap_device: replace debug/warning/error prints with dev_*
    macros
  OMAP3: beagle: don't touch omap_device internals
  OMAP: McBSP: use existing macros for converting between devices
  OMAP: omap_device: remove internal functions from omap_device.h
  OMAP: omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of
    omap_device
  OMAP: omap_device: device register functions now take platform_device
    pointer
  WIP: HACK/RFC: omap_device: begin to decouple platform_device from
    omap_device

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c       |   23 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c                 |   44 ++++----
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c                 |    6 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c                     |   16 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c                    |    8 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c                   |    8 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c              |    8 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c                   |    8 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp.c                     |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c                      |    8 +-
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c                  |   12 +-
 arch/arm/plat-omap/i2c.c                      |    8 +-
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h |   14 +--
 arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c                    |    6 +-
 arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c              |  165 ++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/base/dd.c                             |    2 +-
 16 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.6

             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-21 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21 23:52 Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [PATCH] OMAP: omap_device: replace _find_by_pdev() with to_omap_device() Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22  8:53   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/7] OMAP: omap_device: replace debug/warning/error prints with dev_* macros Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/7] OMAP3: beagle: don't touch omap_device internals Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22  8:57   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28  5:53     ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-28 10:10       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-28 12:57       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-07-28 12:59         ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28 13:31         ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-07-29 13:49           ` Nishanth Menon
2011-07-29 14:05             ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-29 23:07               ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-08-01  8:52                 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-28  8:36     ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-28  8:40     ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/7] OMAP: McBSP: use existing macros for converting between devices Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22  8:58   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-07-22 12:32   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-07-22 20:19     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/7] OMAP: omap_device: remove internal functions from omap_device.h Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/7] OMAP: omap_device: when building return platform_device instead of omap_device Kevin Hilman
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/7] OMAP: omap_device: device register functions now take platform_device pointer Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22  6:16   ` Grant Likely
2011-07-21 23:52 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/7] WIP: HACK/RFC: omap_device: begin to decouple platform_device from omap_device Kevin Hilman
2011-07-22  2:20   ` Grant Likely
2011-07-30 12:03   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-31  2:58     ` Grant Likely
2011-07-31 15:05       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 15:42         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 15:44           ` Grant Likely
2011-08-01 18:50             ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 20:07               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-01 22:11                 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-01 22:55                   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-01 23:09                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-02  0:00                       ` Grant Likely
2011-07-27 14:04 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/7] " G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-07-27 21:45   ` Hilman, Kevin
2011-07-28  4:50     ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-07-29 23:59       ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311292338-11830-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).