Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: imx: Add support for i.MX8MQ
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:12:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1543489928.2507.59.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQ1cqEGABcH3EG9yGo7Ns2fPR1s_u1YPtFoKRjUh50=aa=J2Q@mail.gmail.com>

Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2018, 13:14 -0800 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 11/27/18 12:06 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > Hi Andrey,
> > > 
> > > Am Montag, den 26.11.2018, 10:24 -0800 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:49 AM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sat, 2018-11-17 at 10:12 -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -921,7 +1004,28 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > -?????case IMX7D:
> > > > > > +?????case IMX8MQ:
> > > > > > +?????????????if (of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,iomux-gpr1x",
> > > > > > +??????????????????????????????????????&imx6_pcie->gpr1x)) {
> > > > > > +?????????????????????dev_err(dev, "Failed to get GPR1x address\n");
> > > > > > +?????????????????????return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > +?????????????}
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is for distinguishing multiple controllers on the SOC but other
> > > > > registers and bits might differ. Isn't it preferable to have a property
> > > > > for controller id instead of adding many registers to DT?
> > > > 
> > > > I liked encoding necessary info in DT directly slightly better than
> > > > encoding abstract ID and then decoding it further in the driver code.
> > > > OTOH, I am not really attached to that path. Lucas, can you comment on
> > > > this please?
> > > 
> > > Yes, after rereading the patch with this in mind I agree that having
> > > the GPR offset on DT directly is IMO the better approach than an
> > > abstract ID.
> > 
> > But it's not a single offset, for example the device_type (EP/RC) has
> > bits for the two controllers side-by-side in GPR12.
> > 
> 
> Playing devil's advocate for a bit:
> 
> More specifically, currently the following per-controller bits need to
> be configured:
> 
> - Location of the "device type" field within GPR12
> - GPR register to use to control PCIn_CLKREQ_B_OVERRIDE_EN and
> PCIn_CLKREQ_B_OVERRIDE_EN (GPR14 vs GPR16)
> - Now that Philip spoke against PCIE_CTRL_APPS_CLK_REQ being exposed
> via reset controller driver, we need to know which SRC register to use
> to control that bit (SRC_PCIEPHY_RCR vs. SRC_PCIE2_RCR)

If if we need a lot of different GPR offsets, I revise my earlier
opinion. We certainly don't want lots of bit offsets and masks in the
DT. The whole GPR thing is ugly, but I would rather hide this in the
driver code, keyed by compatible and a controller id property, where we
can change things without any worries about DT backward compatibility.

Regards,
Lucas

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-17 18:12 [PATCH 0/3] PCIE " andrew.smirnov
2018-11-17 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: imx: No-op imx6_setup_phy_mpll() on i.MX7D andrew.smirnov
2018-11-17 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: imx: No-op imx6_pcie_reset_phy() " andrew.smirnov
2018-11-20  1:22   ` tpiepho
2018-11-26 18:32     ` andrew.smirnov
2018-11-17 18:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: imx: Add support for i.MX8MQ andrew.smirnov
2018-11-19  7:07   ` hongxing.zhu
2018-11-26 18:09     ` andrew.smirnov
2018-11-29 10:52       ` hongxing.zhu
2018-11-20 10:48   ` leonard.crestez
2018-11-26 18:24     ` andrew.smirnov
2018-11-27 10:06       ` l.stach
2018-11-27 10:46         ` leonard.crestez
2018-11-27 21:14           ` andrew.smirnov
2018-11-28 10:55             ` leonard.crestez
2018-11-29 11:15               ` l.stach
2018-11-29 11:12             ` l.stach [this message]
2018-11-27 10:16       ` leonard.crestez
2018-11-27 21:03         ` andrew.smirnov
2018-12-03 12:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCIE " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-12-07 11:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1543489928.2507.59.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git