linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>,  <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com>,
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: add debug register for new IC support
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:53:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1621921986-20578-5-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621921986-20578-1-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>

From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>

There are 3 debug info registers in new ICs while in legacy ones,
we have only 2. We add a 'version' field in compatible data to
decide how we extract the debug info.

Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index f5d63c5..bdc8fe9 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -26,12 +26,24 @@ struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
 			u32 addr_h:4;
 			u32 resv:4;
 		} dbg0_bits;
+
+		struct {
+			u32 dmnid:6;
+			u32 vio_w:1;
+			u32 vio_r:1;
+			u32 addr_h:4;
+			u32 resv:20;
+		} dbg0_bits_ver2;
 	};
 
 	u32 vio_dbg1;
+	u32 vio_dbg2;
 };
 
 struct mtk_devapc_data {
+	/* architecture version */
+	u32 version;
+
 	/* default numbers of violation index */
 	u32 vio_idx_num;
 
@@ -40,6 +52,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_data {
 	u32 vio_sta_offset;
 	u32 vio_dbg0_offset;
 	u32 vio_dbg1_offset;
+	u32 vio_dbg2_offset;
 	u32 apc_con_offset;
 	u32 vio_shift_sta_offset;
 	u32 vio_shift_sel_offset;
@@ -163,22 +176,43 @@ static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 	struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs vio_dbgs;
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
 	void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
+	void __iomem *vio_dbg2_reg;
+	u32 vio_addr, bus_id, domain_id;
+	u32 vio_w, vio_r;
 
 	vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg0_offset;
 	vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg1_offset;
+	vio_dbg2_reg = ctx->base + ctx->data->vio_dbg2_offset;
 
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
 	vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1 = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
+	if (ctx->data->version == 2U)
+		vio_dbgs.vio_dbg2 = readl(vio_dbg2_reg);
+
+	if (ctx->data->version == 1U) {
+		/* arch version 1 */
+		bus_id = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.mstid;
+		vio_addr = vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1;
+		domain_id = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.dmnid;
+		vio_w = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.vio_w;
+		vio_r = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.vio_r;
+	} else {
+		/* arch version 2 */
+		bus_id = vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1;
+		vio_addr = vio_dbgs.vio_dbg2;
+		domain_id = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits_ver2.dmnid;
+		vio_w = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits_ver2.vio_w;
+		vio_r = vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits_ver2.vio_r;
+	}
 
 	/* Print violation information */
-	if (vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.vio_w)
+	if (vio_w)
 		dev_info(ctx->dev, "Write Violation\n");
-	else if (vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.vio_r)
+	else if (vio_r)
 		dev_info(ctx->dev, "Read Violation\n");
 
 	dev_info(ctx->dev, "Bus ID:0x%x, Dom ID:0x%x, Vio Addr:0x%x\n",
-		 vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.mstid, vio_dbgs.dbg0_bits.dmnid,
-		 vio_dbgs.vio_dbg1);
+		 bus_id, domain_id, vio_addr);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -219,6 +253,7 @@ static void stop_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 }
 
 static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
+	.version = 1,
 	.vio_idx_num = 511,
 	.vio_mask_offset = 0x0,
 	.vio_sta_offset = 0x400,
-- 
2.6.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25  5:53 [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: devapc: Add 'vio-idx-num' field to support mt8192 Nina Wu
2021-05-25  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: get 'vio_idx_num' info from DT Nina Wu
2021-05-25  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: add shared flag to IRQ Nina Wu
2021-05-25  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: rename register variable infra_base Nina Wu
2021-05-25  5:53 ` Nina Wu [this message]
2021-05-25  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: support mt8192 Nina Wu
2021-05-25  5:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add devapc node Nina Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1621921986-20578-5-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com \
    --to=nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).