From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:33:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624153338.GA3762@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624153033.3jpdd7vsekdiltmb@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Hi Russell,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:17AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > > Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to represent
> > > > their cpu topologies. Since, we are moving the ARM64 topology to common
> > > > code to be used by other architectures, we can reuse that for ARM32 as
> > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > Take this opprtunity to remove the redundant functions from ARM32 and
> > > > reuse the common code instead.
> > > >
> > > > To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> (on TC2)
> > > > Reviewed-by : Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Hi Russell,
> > > > Can we get a ACK for this patch ? We are hoping that the entire
> > > > series can be merged at one go.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to get this in for v5.3 as it's almost there.
> > > Are you fine with these changes ?
> > >
> >
> > Do you have any objections with this patch ? We plan to merge through
> > RISC-V tree, please let us know. It has been acked-by all the other
> > maintainers.
>
> I have no interest in the CPU topology code; as far as I know I have
> no systems that are able to exercise this code in any way. Therefore,
> I don't know this code, I have no way to test it, and so it is not
> appropriate for me to ack patches for it.
>
I completely understand that and we can take care of testing. As along
as you don't have objections to this, that should be fine I believe.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 18:59 [PATCH v7 0/7] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra
2019-06-27 0:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-06-27 2:18 ` Atish Patra
2019-06-27 19:58 ` Atish Patra
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2019-06-19 17:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-21 22:31 ` Atish Patra
2019-06-23 17:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions Atish Patra
2019-06-19 12:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-24 15:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-24 15:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-06-24 15:33 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] base: arch_topology: update Kconfig help description Atish Patra
2019-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for generic architecture topology Atish Patra
2019-06-19 17:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624153338.GA3762@e107155-lin \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=ottosabart@seberm.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).