Re: [PATCH v12 1/7] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Document A64 MIPI-DSI controller

[Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3132 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:37:20PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:06 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:18:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > The MIPI DSI controller in Allwinner A64 is similar to A33.
> > >
> > > But unlike A33, A64 doesn't have DSI_SCLK gating so it is valid
> > > to have separate compatible for A64 on the same driver.
> > >
> > > DSI_SCLK uses mod clock-names on dt-bindings, so the same
> > > is not required for A64.
> > >
> > > On that note
> > > - A64 require minimum of 1 clock like the bus clock
> > > - A33 require minimum of 2 clocks like both bus, mod clocks
> > >
> > > So, update dt-bindings so-that it can document both A33,
> > > A64 bindings requirements.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v12:
> > > - Use 'enum' instead of oneOf+const
> > >
> > >  .../display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml
> > > index dafc0980c4fa..b91446475f35 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml
> > > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ properties:
> > >    "#size-cells": true
> > >
> > >    compatible:
> > > -    const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi
> > > +      - allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi
> > >
> > >    reg:
> > >      maxItems: 1
> > > @@ -24,6 +26,8 @@ properties:
> > >      maxItems: 1
> > >
> > >    clocks:
> > > +    minItems: 1
> > > +    maxItems: 2
> > >      items:
> > >        - description: Bus Clock
> > >        - description: Module Clock
> > > @@ -63,13 +67,25 @@ required:
> > >    - reg
> > >    - interrupts
> > >    - clocks
> > > -  - clock-names
> > >    - phys
> > >    - phy-names
> > >    - resets
> > >    - vcc-dsi-supply
> > >    - port
> > >
> > > +allOf:
> > > +  - if:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +         compatible:
> > > +           contains:
> > > +             const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi
> > > +      then:
> > > +        properties:
> > > +          clocks:
> > > +            minItems: 2
> > > +        required:
> > > +          - clock-names
> > > +
> >
> > Your else condition should check that the number of clocks items is 1
> > on the A64
>
> But the minItems mentioned as 1 in clocks, which is unchanged number
> by default. doesn't it sufficient?

In the main schema, it's said that the clocks property can have one or
two elements (to cover the A31 case that has one, and the A64 case
that has 2).

This is fine.

Later on, you enforce that the A64 has two elements, and this is fine
too.

However, you never check that on the A31 you only have one clock, and
you could very well have two and no one would notice.

Maxime

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel