linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kernel-team@android.com, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:32:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200702093239.GA15391@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-5-will@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Rather then relying on the core code to use smp_read_barrier_depends()
> as part of the READ_ONCE() definition, instead override __READ_ONCE()
> in the Alpha code so that it is treated the same way as
> smp_load_acquire().
> 
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h | 61 ++++----------------------------
>  arch/alpha/include/asm/rwonce.h  | 19 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/alpha/include/asm/rwonce.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 92ec486a4f9e..2ecd068d91d1 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -2,64 +2,17 @@
>  #ifndef __BARRIER_H
>  #define __BARRIER_H
>  
> -#include <asm/compiler.h>
> -
>  #define mb()	__asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
>  #define rmb()	__asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
>  #define wmb()	__asm__ __volatile__("wmb": : :"memory")

> -#define read_barrier_depends() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
> +#define __smp_load_acquire(p)						\
> +({									\
> +	__unqual_scalar_typeof(*p) ___p1 =				\
> +		(*(volatile typeof(___p1) *)(p));			\
> +	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);				\
> +	___p1;								\
> +})

Sorry if I'm being thick, but doesn't this need a barrier after the
volatile access to provide the acquire semantic?

IIUC prior to this commit alpha would have used the asm-generic
__smp_load_acquire, i.e.

| #ifndef __smp_load_acquire
| #define __smp_load_acquire(p)                                           \
| ({                                                                      \
|         __unqual_scalar_typeof(*p) ___p1 = READ_ONCE(*p);               \
|         compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);                             \
|         __smp_mb();                                                     \
|         (typeof(*p))___p1;                                              \
| })
| #endif

... where the __smp_mb() would be alpha's mb() from earlier in the patch
context, i.e.

| #define mb() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")

... so don't we need similar before returning ___p1 above in
__smp_load_acquire() (and also matching the old read_barrier_depends())?

[...]

> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Alpha is apparently daft enough to reorder address-dependent loads
> + * on some CPU implementations. Knock some common sense into it with
> + * a memory barrier in READ_ONCE().
> + */
> +#define __READ_ONCE(x)	__smp_load_acquire(&(x))

As above, I don't see a memory barrier implied here, so this doesn't
look quite right.

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-02  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 17:37 [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/18] tools: bpf: Use local copy of headers including uapi/linux/filter.h Will Deacon
2020-07-01 16:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:16     ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-07-01 11:33       ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 03/18] asm/rwonce: Allow __READ_ONCE to be overridden by the architecture Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:32   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2020-07-02  9:48     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 10:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:18         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 14:43   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:55     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 15:07       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 05/18] asm/rwonce: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() invocation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 07/18] alpha: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() usage with smp_[r]mb() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 08/18] locking/barriers: Remove definitions for [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 09/18] Documentation/barriers: Remove references to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 10/18] Documentation/barriers/kokr: " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 11/18] tools/memory-model: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from informal doc Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 12/18] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 13/18] checkpatch: Remove checks relating to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 14/18] arm64: Reduce the number of header files pulled into vmlinux.lds.S Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 15/18] arm64: alternatives: Split up alternative.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 16/18] arm64: cpufeatures: Add capability for LDAPR instruction Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 17/18] arm64: alternatives: Remove READ_ONCE() usage during patch operation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:19     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:47   ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 20:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 22:57     ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-07-01 10:25       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 17:07   ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-02  7:23     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 16:00       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:05           ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 10:29               ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 22:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 23:01                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-08  7:15                     ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  9:16                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 18:20                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 18:35         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 19:23           ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:08   ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 18:35     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-07 10:10       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-01  7:38 ` [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200702093239.GA15391@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).