linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mathieu.poirier@linaro.org" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:37:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200727073757.r2vq6djh3a4dyfp6@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0402MB276063FBE74FCF222CB00F8588720@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4324 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:51:00AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:28:20AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Hi Oleksij,
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:08:06PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > We might need to map an region multiple times, becaue the region
> > > > > might be shared between remote processors, such i.MX8QM with dual
> > M4 cores.
> > > > > So use devm_ioremap, not devm_ioremap_resource.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please give an example of this kind of shared resources and
> > > > how they should be handled by two separate devices?
> > >
> > > This is to share vdevbuffer space, there is a vdevbuffer in device
> > > tree, it will be shared between M4_0 and M4_1.
> > >
> > > For the buffer, it is Linux DMA API will handle the space.
> > 
> > Why remoteproc need to care about it? If I see it correctly, from the linux
> > perspective, it is one buffer and one driver is responsible for it. Or do I missing
> > some thing?
> 
> We not have the vdev buffer in resource table, so I added in device tree, see below:

Hm.. if vdev is not in resource table and should not be controlled by
remoteproc, why do we need remoteproc?

>         imx8qm_cm40: imx8qm_cm4@0 {
>                 compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-cm4";
>                 rsc-da = <0x90000000>;
>                 mbox-names = "tx", "rx", "rxdb";
>                 mboxes = <&lsio_mu5 0 1
>                           &lsio_mu5 1 1
>                           &lsio_mu5 3 1>;
>                 mub-partition = <3>;
>                 memory-region = <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>, <&vdevbuffer>,
>                                 <&vdev1vring0>, <&vdev1vring1>;
>                 core-index = <0>;
>                 core-id = <IMX_SC_R_M4_0_PID0>;
>                 status = "okay";
>                 power-domains = <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_0_PID0>,
>                                 <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_0_MU_1A>;
>         };
> 
>         imx8qm_cm41: imx8x_cm4@1 {
>                 compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-cm4";
>                 rsc-da = <0x90100000>;
>                 mbox-names = "tx", "rx", "rxdb";
>                 mboxes = <&lsio_mu6 0 1
>                           &lsio_mu6 1 1
>                           &lsio_mu6 3 1>;
>                 mub-partition = <4>;
>                 memory-region = <&vdev2vring0>, <&vdev2vring1>, <&vdevbuffer>,
>                                 <&vdev3vring0>, <&vdev3vring1>;
>                 core-index = <1>;
>                 core-id = <IMX_SC_R_M4_1_PID0>;
>                 status = "okay";
>                 power-domains = <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_1_PID0>,
>                                 <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_1_MU_1A>;
>         };
> 
>                 vdevbuffer: vdevbuffer {
>                         compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>                         reg = <0 0x90400000 0 0x100000>;
>                         no-map;
>                 };
> 
> I have the upper vdevbuffer node shared between M40 and M41 node.
> The vdevbuffer will be used as virtio data buffer.
> 
> And I have the following in rproc_add_virtio_dev to share vdevbuffer:
>         /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
>         mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
>         if (!mem)
>                 mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdevbuffer");

With kernel v5.8-rc7 i get following call chain:
rproc_boot()
  rproc_fw_boot()
    rproc_handle_vdev
      rproc_vdev_do_start()
        rproc_add_virtio_dev()


So, at the end, we will call rproc_add_virtio_dev() only if we boot
firmware by linux, or if we get at least the resource table.

Since none of this seems to be the case, i still do not understand how
it should work.

> Hope this is clear.

:) i still need some time to understand it.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-27  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24  8:08 [PATCH 00/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support iMX8M and early boot Peng Fan
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX8MQ/M Peng Fan
2020-07-31 20:14   ` Rob Herring
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct err message Peng Fan
2020-08-11 19:56   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap Peng Fan
2020-07-27  6:23   ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27  6:28     ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27  6:41       ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27  6:51         ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27  7:37           ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2020-07-27  8:11             ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28  7:20               ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make syscon optional Peng Fan
2020-08-11 22:40   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-18 21:43   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-19  0:51     ` Peng Fan
2020-08-19 19:45       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-20  2:04         ` Peng Fan
2020-08-20 19:27           ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional Peng Fan
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add load hook Peng Fan
2020-07-27  5:20   ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-08-11 21:40   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 07/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw hook Peng Fan
2020-08-11 21:56   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MQ/M Peng Fan
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox Peng Fan
2020-07-24  8:08 ` [PATCH 10/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support coproc booting before Linux Peng Fan
2020-08-11 22:36   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-07-27  6:38 ` [PATCH 00/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support iMX8M and early boot Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27  6:44   ` Peng Fan
2020-07-27  7:54     ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-27  9:18       ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28  7:26         ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28  7:50           ` Peng Fan
2020-07-28  7:55             ` Oleksij Rempel
2020-07-28  9:36               ` Peng Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200727073757.r2vq6djh3a4dyfp6@pengutronix.de \
    --to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).