linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:46:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217174632.660934f7@slackpad.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04b5f537-1594-61b9-b7ef-4062e732e380@arm.com>

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:55:43 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:

Hi,

> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> 
> > The i8042 is clearly an 8-bit era device, so there is little room for
> > 32-bit registers.
> > Clean up the data types used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/i8042.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i8042.c b/hw/i8042.c
> > index 37a99a2d..36ee183f 100644
> > --- a/hw/i8042.c
> > +++ b/hw/i8042.c
> > @@ -64,11 +64,11 @@
> >  struct kbd_state {
> >  	struct kvm		*kvm;
> >  
> > -	char			kq[QUEUE_SIZE];	/* Keyboard queue */
> > +	u8			kq[QUEUE_SIZE];	/* Keyboard queue */
> >  	int			kread, kwrite;	/* Indexes into the queue */
> >  	int			kcount;		/* number of elements in queue */
> >  
> > -	char			mq[QUEUE_SIZE];
> > +	u8			mq[QUEUE_SIZE];
> >  	int			mread, mwrite;
> >  	int			mcount;  
> 
> I think the write_cmd field further down should also be u8 because it stores the
> first byte of a command (and it's set only to an 8 bit value in kbd_write_command()).

Yes, looks like it, will change it on the way. I guess I wanted to
suppress my rewrite-everything complex ;-)

If you allow, I will also fix the confusing indentation bug in the big
switch statement on the way.
 
> Otherwise, it looks ok to me. osdev wiki seems to confirm that the device is
> indeed 8 bit only, and all the registers are 8 bit now:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Thanks!
Andre

> 
> >  
> > @@ -173,9 +173,9 @@ static void kbd_write_command(struct kvm *kvm, u8 val)
> >  /*
> >   * Called when the OS reads from port 0x60 (PS/2 data)
> >   */
> > -static u32 kbd_read_data(void)
> > +static u8 kbd_read_data(void)
> >  {
> > -	u32 ret;
> > +	u8 ret;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> >  	if (state.kcount != 0) {
> > @@ -202,9 +202,9 @@ static u32 kbd_read_data(void)
> >  /*
> >   * Called when the OS read from port 0x64, the command port
> >   */
> > -static u32 kbd_read_status(void)
> > +static u8 kbd_read_status(void)
> >  {
> > -	return (u32)state.status;
> > +	return state.status;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static u32 kbd_read_status(void)
> >   * Things written here are generally arguments to commands previously
> >   * written to port 0x64 and stored in state.write_cmd
> >   */
> > -static void kbd_write_data(u32 val)
> > +static void kbd_write_data(u8 val)
> >  {
> >  	switch (state.write_cmd) {
> >  	case I8042_CMD_CTL_WCTR:
> > @@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ static bool kbd_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  	case I8042_DATA_REG: {
> > -		u32 value = kbd_read_data();
> > -		ioport__write32(data, value);
> > +		u8 value = kbd_read_data();
> > +		ioport__write8(data, value);
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  	case I8042_PORT_B_REG: {
> > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static bool kbd_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  	case I8042_DATA_REG: {
> > -		u32 value = ioport__read32(data);
> > +		u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
> >  		kbd_write_data(value);
> >  		break;
> >  	}  


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:16     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:34       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217174632.660934f7@slackpad.fritz.box \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).