linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch()
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Since x86 had a special need for registering tons of special I/O ports,
> we had an ioport__setup_arch() callback, to allow each architecture
> to do the same. As it turns out no one uses it beside x86, so we remove
> that unnecessary abstraction.
>
> The generic function was registered via a device_base_init() call, so
> we just do the same for the x86 specific function only, and can remove
> the unneeded ioport__setup_arch().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  arm/ioport.c         |  5 -----
>  include/kvm/ioport.h |  1 -
>  ioport.c             | 28 ----------------------------
>  mips/kvm.c           |  5 -----
>  powerpc/ioport.c     |  6 ------
>  x86/ioport.c         | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/ioport.c b/arm/ioport.c
> index 2f0feb9a..24092c9d 100644
> --- a/arm/ioport.c
> +++ b/arm/ioport.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@
>  #include "kvm/ioport.h"
>  #include "kvm/irq.h"
>  
> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq)
>  {
>  	*irq = irq__alloc_line();
> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h
> index 039633f7..d0213541 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct ioport_operations {
>  							    enum irq_type));
>  };
>  
> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq);
>  
>  int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops,
> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c
> index 844a832d..667e8386 100644
> --- a/ioport.c
> +++ b/ioport.c
> @@ -158,21 +158,6 @@ int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void ioport__unregister_all(void)
> -{
> -	struct ioport *entry;
> -	struct rb_node *rb;
> -	struct rb_int_node *rb_node;
> -
> -	rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree);
> -	while (rb) {
> -		rb_node = rb_int(rb);
> -		entry = ioport_node(rb_node);
> -		ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry);
> -		rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree);
> -	}
> -}

I get the impression this is a rebasing artifact. The commit message doesn't
mention anything about removing ioport__exit() -> ioport__unregister_all(), and as
far as I can tell it's still needed because there are places other than
ioport__setup_arch() from where ioport__register() is called.

Thanks,

Alex

> -
>  static const char *to_direction(int direction)
>  {
>  	if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN)
> @@ -220,16 +205,3 @@ out:
>  
>  	return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug;
>  }
> -
> -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	return ioport__setup_arch(kvm);
> -}
> -dev_base_init(ioport__init);
> -
> -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	ioport__unregister_all();
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -dev_base_exit(ioport__exit);
> diff --git a/mips/kvm.c b/mips/kvm.c
> index 26355930..e110e5d5 100644
> --- a/mips/kvm.c
> +++ b/mips/kvm.c
> @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
>  		die_perror("KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl");
>  }
>  
> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  bool kvm__arch_cpu_supports_vm(void)
>  {
>  	return true;
> diff --git a/powerpc/ioport.c b/powerpc/ioport.c
> index 0c188b61..a5cff4ee 100644
> --- a/powerpc/ioport.c
> +++ b/powerpc/ioport.c
> @@ -12,12 +12,6 @@
>  
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  
> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
> -{
> -	/* PPC has no legacy ioports to set up */
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq)
>  {
>  }
> diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c
> index 7ad7b8f3..8c5c7699 100644
> --- a/x86/ioport.c
> +++ b/x86/ioport.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  
> @@ -150,3 +150,26 @@ int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch);
> +
> +static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020);
> +	ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 14:28 [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-02-11 17:16     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:32       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:46         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 10:23           ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:01             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 02/21] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 12:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-11 17:45     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 14:05   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 15:54     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 04/21] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:10   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:43     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 15:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 05/21] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 16:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 17:46     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 06/21] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-11 17:23   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 10:34     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 11:17       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 11:48         ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:03           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 07/21] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 10:41   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:09     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 16:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 08/21] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 09/21] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:27   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:05     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 10/21] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 11:56   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 11/21] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 12:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:28 ` [PATCH kvmtool 12/21] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-12 17:50   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 13/21] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:22   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 14:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-22 17:40       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-24 14:54         ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 14/21] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 15/21] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:47   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 15:51     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 16/21] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 14:52   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 17/21] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-16 17:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:13     ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 18/21] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 19/21] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-17 16:11     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:34       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 20/21] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-17 16:48   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 12:18     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:38       ` Andre Przywara
2020-12-10 14:29 ` [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-18 13:33   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-18 16:41     ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-10 17:44 ` [PATCH kvmtool 00/21] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).