linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/20] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:47:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210604164716.GA3416@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210525183302.56293-3-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 07:32:44PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> For non-fatal exceptions taken from EL0, we expect that at some point
> during exception handling it is possible to return to a regular process
> context with all exceptions unmasked (e.g. as we do in
> do_notify_resume()), and we generally aim to unmask exceptions wherever
> possible.
> 
> While handling SError and debug exceptions from EL0, we need to leave
> some exceptions masked during handling. Handling SError requires us to
> mask SError (which also requires masking IRQ+FIQ), and handing debug
> exceptions requires us to mask debug (which also requires masking
> SError+IRQ+FIQ).
> 
> Once do_serror() or do_debug_exception() has returned, we no longer need
> to mask exceptions, and can unmask them all, which is what we did prior
> to commit:
> 
>   9034f6251572a474 ("arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit")
> 
> ... where we had to mask IRQs as for context_tracking_user_exit()
> expected IRQs to be masked.
> 
> Since then, we realised that our context tracking wasn't entirely
> correct, and reworked the entry code to fix this. As of commit:
> 
>   23529049c6842382 ("arm64: entry: fix non-NMI user<->kernel transitions")
> 
> ... we replaced the call to context_tracking_user_exit() with a call to
> user_exit_irqoff() as part of enter_from_user_mode(), which occurs
> earlier, before the we run the body of the handler and unmask exceptions

before the we run

> in DAIF.
> 
> When we return to userspace, we go via ret_to_user(), which masks
> exceptions in DAIF prior to calling user_enter_irqoff() as part of
> exit_to_user_mode().
> 
> Thus, there's no longer a reason to leave IRQs or FIQs masked at the end
> of the EL) debug or error handlers, as neither the user exit context

EL)

> tracking nor the user entry context tracking requires this. Let's bring
> these into line with other EL0 exceptions handlers and ensure that IRQ

exceptions handlers

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-04 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 12:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:47   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 15:43   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 16:54     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:51   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:39     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:44       ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 18:01         ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:57   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:42     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:43       ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:13   ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] arm64: entry: fold el1_inv() into el1h_64_sync_handler() Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:16   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:49     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Catalin Marinas
2021-05-27 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210604164716.GA3416@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).