linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/20] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:43:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210604174307.GA3703@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604174216.GC73426@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 05:57:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > In subsequent patches we'll rework the way bad_mode is called by
> > > exception entry code. In preparation for this, let's move bad_mode()
> > > itself into entry-common.c.
> > > 
> > > Let's also mark it as noinstr (e.g. to prevent it being kprobed), and
> > > let's also make the `handler` array a local variable, as this is only
> > > use by bad_mode(), and will be removed entirely in a subsequent patch.
> > > 
> > > There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c        | 25 -------------------------
> > >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > index 9c0ed05b98c4..25531a0b547e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> > >  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
> > >  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> > > +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > >   * This is intended to match the logic in irqentry_enter(), handling the kernel
> > > @@ -159,6 +160,32 @@ static void do_interrupt_handler(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > >  extern void (*handle_arch_irq)(struct pt_regs *);
> > >  extern void (*handle_arch_fiq)(struct pt_regs *);
> > >  
> > > +/*
> > > + * bad_mode handles the impossible case in the exception vector. This is always
> > > + * fatal.
> > > + */
> > > +asmlinkage void noinstr bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
> > > +{
> > > +	const char *handler[] = {
> > > +		"Synchronous Abort",
> > > +		"IRQ",
> > > +		"FIQ",
> > > +		"Error"
> > > +	};
> > 
> > If you're rejigging this array anyway, maybe initialising it as:
> > 
> > 	[BAD_SYNC]	= "Synchronous Abort",
> > 	[BAD_IRQ]	= ...
> > 
> > might make it even clearer. Up to you.
> 
> Since I'm removing the BAD_* definitions (and the array) in a latter
> patch, I'd prefer to leave this as-is here so that this clearly has no
> functional change.

Sure thing, I only spotted that after I'd already replied to this.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-04 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] arm64: remove redundant local_daif_mask() in bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 12:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] arm64: entry: unmask IRQ+FIQ after EL0 handling Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:47   ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] arm64: entry: convert SError handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] arm64: entry: move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] arm64: entry: move preempt logic to C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 15:43   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 16:54     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] arm64: entry: add a call_on_irq_stack helper Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] arm64: entry: convert IRQ+FIQ handlers to C Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] arm64: entry: organise entry handlers consistently Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:51   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:39     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:44       ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 18:01         ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] arm64: entry: organise entry vectors consistently Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] arm64: entry: consolidate EL1 exception returns Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] arm64: entry: move bad_mode() to entry-common.c Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 16:57   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:42     ` Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:43       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] arm64: entry: improve bad_mode() Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] arm64: entry: template the entry asm functions Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] arm64: entry: handle all vectors with C Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:13   ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] arm64: entry: fold el1_inv() into el1h_64_sync_handler() Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] arm64: entry: split bad stack entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] arm64: entry: split SDEI entry Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] arm64: entry: make NMI entry/exit functions static Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] arm64: entry: don't instrument entry code with KCOV Mark Rutland
2021-06-04 17:16   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-04 17:49     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-25 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] arm64: idle: don't instrument idle " Mark Rutland
2021-05-27 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/20] arm64: entry: migrate more code to C Catalin Marinas
2021-05-27 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210604174307.GA3703@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).