linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: Avoid accessing PCIe registers with clocks gated
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 23:02:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALeDE9PAEArn6zTNkWe+eNomx4f1A2sK=jB+7GzE8MRJo=epAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608080409.1729276-1-javierm@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:04 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> IRQ handlers that are registered for shared interrupts can be called at
> any time after have been registered using the request_irq() function.
>
> It's up to drivers to ensure that's always safe for these to be called.
>
> Both the "pcie-sys" and "pcie-client" interrupts are shared, but since
> their handlers are registered very early in the probe function, an error
> later can lead to these handlers being executed before all the required
> resources have been properly setup.
>
> For example, the rockchip_pcie_read() function used by these IRQ handlers
> expects that some PCIe clocks will already be enabled, otherwise trying
> to access the PCIe registers causes the read to hang and never return.
>
> The CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ option tests if drivers are able to cope with their
> shared interrupt handlers being called, by generating a spurious interrupt
> just before a shared interrupt handler is unregistered.
>
> But this means that if the option is enabled, any error in the probe path
> of this driver could lead to one of the IRQ handlers to be executed.
>
> In a rockpro64 board, the following sequence of events happens:
>
>   1) "pcie-sys" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
>   2) "pcie-client" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
>   3) probe later fails due readl_poll_timeout() returning a timeout.
>   4) the "pcie-sys" IRQ is unregistered.
>   5) CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ triggers a spurious interrupt.
>   6) "pcie-client" IRQ handler is called for this spurious interrupt.
>   7) IRQ handler tries to read PCIE_CLIENT_INT_STATUS with clocks gated.
>   8) the machine hangs because rockchip_pcie_read() call never returns.
>
> To avoid cases like this, the handlers don't have to be registered until
> very late in the probe function, once all the resources have been setup.
>
> So let's just move all the IRQ init before the pci_host_probe() call, that
> will prevent issues like this and seems to be the correct thing to do too.
>
> Reported-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>

Tested on a Rock960, Firefly3399 and a Pinebook Pro

> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add missing word in the commit message.
> - Include Shawn Lin's Acked-by tag.
>
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> index f1d08a1b159..78d04ac29cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> @@ -592,10 +592,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
>
> -       err = rockchip_pcie_setup_irq(rockchip);
> -       if (err)
> -               return err;
> -
>         rockchip->vpcie12v = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie12v");
>         if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v)) {
>                 if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV)
> @@ -973,8 +969,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (err)
>                 goto err_vpcie;
>
> -       rockchip_pcie_enable_interrupts(rockchip);
> -
>         err = rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain(rockchip);
>         if (err < 0)
>                 goto err_deinit_port;
> @@ -992,6 +986,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         bridge->sysdata = rockchip;
>         bridge->ops = &rockchip_pcie_ops;
>
> +       err = rockchip_pcie_setup_irq(rockchip);
> +       if (err)
> +               goto err_remove_irq_domain;
> +
> +       rockchip_pcie_enable_interrupts(rockchip);
> +
>         err = pci_host_probe(bridge);
>         if (err < 0)
>                 goto err_remove_irq_domain;
> --
> 2.31.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-12 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08  8:04 [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: Avoid accessing PCIe registers with clocks gated Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-12 22:02 ` Peter Robinson [this message]
2021-06-22 10:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-24 21:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-24 23:18   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 23:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-24 23:51       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 22:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-25  7:09   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-25 14:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-25 18:34       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-29  0:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-29  6:17     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-29 10:52       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 23:14         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30  9:44           ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-30 18:49         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 19:59   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-30 20:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 20:46       ` Peter Robinson
2021-06-30 22:09       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-07-01 13:59         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-01 14:59           ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALeDE9PAEArn6zTNkWe+eNomx4f1A2sK=jB+7GzE8MRJo=epAw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).