linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] arm64/sysreg: Provide a helper macro for defining sysreg bitmasks
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:15:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjtx6on6/pZ5rBjU@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjtfwQo+lXsOu1L+@lakrids>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1005 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:58:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 05:08:44PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Ideally this should be provided along with the generic BIT() macros however
> > there are a bunch of existing places with such macros including some that
> > actually call their macro BITMASK() so rather than create a dependency on
> > a wider cleanup let's define something local for now, this can be improved
> > later. This also sidesteps the need to consider types other than u64.

> In <linux/bits.h> we have GENMASK() and GENMASK_ULL() for this. Is there
> a problem using those?

> I think I got confused as to the name in the original version of the
> scripting patch, and used BITMASK() by accident rather than by design,
> but I could be mistaken.

They should do the trick, yes - I was *sure* there was something but
couldn't find it when I was searching around since I was looking for
some variation on a name with BIT in it and obviously the above doesn't
match.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-23 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-16 17:08 [PATCH v2 0/9] arm64: Automatic system register definition generation Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] arm64/mte: Move shift from definition of TCF0 enumeration values Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] arm64/sysreg: Standardise ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 macro names Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] arm64/sysreg: Rename SCTLR_EL1_NTWE/TWI to SCTLR_EL1_nTWE/TWI Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] arm64/sysreg: Provide a helper macro for defining sysreg bitmasks Mark Brown
2022-03-23 17:58   ` Mark Rutland
2022-03-23 19:15     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arm64: Add sysreg header generation scripting Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] arm64/sysreg: Enable automatic generation of system register definitions Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64/sysreg: Generate definitions for ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arm64/sysreg: Generate definitions for TTBRn_EL1 Mark Brown
2022-03-16 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] arm64/sysreg: Generate definitions for SCTLR_EL1 Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yjtx6on6/pZ5rBjU@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).