Re: [PATCH][next][V2] i2c: xiic: fix indentation issue

[Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>]

On 2020-01-29 00:10, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 28/01/2020 21:45, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2020-01-27 13:08, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>> On 27/01/2020 12:05, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>>> On 27. 01. 20 11:23, Colin King wrote:
>>>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a statement that is indented one level too deeply, remove
>>>>>> the extraneous tab.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> V2: fix type in commit message
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>>>>> index b17d30c9ab40..90c1c362394d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xiic.c
>>>>>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int xiic_clear_rx_fifo(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
>>>>>>  		xiic_getreg8(i2c, XIIC_DRR_REG_OFFSET);
>>>>>>  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>>>>>>  			dev_err(i2c->dev, "Failed to clear rx fifo\n");
>>>>>> -				return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>>>>> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>>>>>  		}
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As was suggested by Peter you should also add Fixes: <sha1> ("patch
>>>>> subject")
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's not really a bugfix, it's just a cleanup.
>>>
>>> I'm surprised i wasn't asked for a bug number too.
>>
>> Very funny.
> 
> Apologies for being flippant. I didn't mean to offend. My bad #1.

Apology accepted, no hard feelings. Don't worry about it, and sorry on my
part for a possible overreaction!

Cheers,
Peter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel