Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 8/9] spmi: pmic-arb: make interrupt support optional

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Fenglin Wu (2021-09-16 23:33:03)
> From: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Make the support of PMIC peripheral interrupts optional for
> spmi-pmic-arb devices.  This is useful in situations where
> SPMI address mapping is required without the need for IRQ
> support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------

Is there a binding update? Can the binding be converted to YAML as well?

>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> index 988204c..55fa981 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> @@ -1280,10 +1280,12 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 goto err_put_ctrl;
>         }
>  
> -       pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
> -       if (pmic_arb->irq < 0) {
> -               err = pmic_arb->irq;
> -               goto err_put_ctrl;
> +       if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupt-names", NULL)) {

I don't think we should be keying off of interrupt-names. Instead we
should be checking for something else. Maybe interrupt-controller
property?

> +               pmic_arb->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "periph_irq");
> +               if (pmic_arb->irq < 0) {
> +                       err = pmic_arb->irq;
> +                       goto err_put_ctrl;