From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Vara Reddy <varar@codeaurora.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/msm/dp: Allow attaching a drm_panel
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:53:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522215348.uoyboow26n2o3tel@ripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <do5veo5axxbvmcddpqf7u5rfer6soxzy5selfnjv5sn6n57h47@q3hfznslndba>
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:51:01PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:38:21PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 09:15:12AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > The one thing that I still don't understand though is, if the typec_mux
> > > is used by the typec controller to inform _the_ mux about the function
> > > to be used, what's up with the complexity in typec_mux_match()? This is
> > > what lead me to believe that typec_mux was enabling/disabling individual
> > > altmodes, rather just flipping the physical switch at the bottom.
> >
> > Ah, typec_mux_match() is a mess. I'm sorry about that. I think most of
> > the code in that function is not used by anybody. If I remember
> > correctly, all that complexity is attempting to solve some
> > hypothetical corner case(s). Probable a case where we have multiple
> > muxes per port to deal with.
> >
> > I think it would probable be best to clean the function to the bare
> > minimum by keeping only the parts that are actually used today
> > (attached).
> >
>
> Sorry for not replying to this in a timely manner Heikki. I've been
> ignoring this issue for a long time now, just adding "svid" to our dts
> files. But, this obviously shows up in DT validation - and I'd prefer
> not defining these properties as valid.
>
> The attached patch works as expected.
>
Sorry, I must have failed at applying the patch - it doesn't work...
> Could you please spin this as a proper patch, so we can get it merged?
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > thanks,
> >
> > --
> > heikki
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > index c8340de0ed495..44f168c9bd9bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > @@ -193,56 +193,15 @@ static int mux_fwnode_match(struct device *dev, const void *fwnode)
> > static void *typec_mux_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id,
> > void *data)
> > {
> > - const struct typec_altmode_desc *desc = data;
> > struct device *dev;
> > - bool match;
> > - int nval;
> > - u16 *val;
> > - int ret;
> > - int i;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Check has the identifier already been "consumed". If it
> > - * has, no need to do any extra connection identification.
> > + * The connection identifier will be needed with device graph (OF graph).
> > + * Device graph is not supported by this code yet, so bailing out.
> > */
> > - match = !id;
> > - if (match)
> > - goto find_mux;
> > -
> > - /* Accessory Mode muxes */
> > - if (!desc) {
> > - match = fwnode_property_present(fwnode, "accessory");
> > - if (match)
> > - goto find_mux;
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Alternate Mode muxes */
> > - nval = fwnode_property_count_u16(fwnode, "svid");
> > - if (nval <= 0)
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - val = kcalloc(nval, sizeof(*val), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!val)
> > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > -
> > - ret = fwnode_property_read_u16_array(fwnode, "svid", val, nval);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - kfree(val);
> > - return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > - }
> > -
> > - for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) {
> > - match = val[i] == desc->svid;
> > - if (match) {
> > - kfree(val);
> > - goto find_mux;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - kfree(val);
> > - return NULL;
> > + if (id)
We pass id as "mode-switch", so this will never be NULL. But we also only
want to consider endpoints with "mode-switch", otherwise we'll fail if
any of the referred endpoints is not implementing a typec_mux...
So this needs the same snippet we find in typec_switch_match():
/*
* Device graph (OF graph) does not give any means to identify the
* device type or the device class of the remote port parent that @fwnode
* represents, so in order to identify the type or the class of @fwnode
* an additional device property is needed. With typec switches the
* property is named "orientation-switch" (@id). The value of the device
* property is ignored.
*/
if (id && !fwnode_property_present(fwnode, id))
return NULL;
With that, this works as expected!
Regards,
Bjorn
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
> >
> > -find_mux:
> > dev = class_find_device(&typec_mux_class, NULL, fwnode,
> > mux_fwnode_match);
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-26 23:13 [RFC] drm/msm/dp: Allow attaching a drm_panel Bjorn Andersson
2021-07-29 9:59 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-08-25 23:28 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-08-26 1:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-26 20:36 ` Doug Anderson
2021-08-26 20:29 ` Doug Anderson
2021-08-27 20:52 ` Doug Anderson
2021-08-28 14:40 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-08-30 16:01 ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-01 21:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-05 0:36 ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-05 1:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-05 1:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-10-05 2:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-05 15:39 ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-05 17:34 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-05 23:09 ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-06 2:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-06 15:12 ` Doug Anderson
2021-10-06 20:26 ` Prashant Malani
2021-10-07 10:17 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-10-07 16:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-08 12:38 ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-05-22 20:51 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-05-22 21:53 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2023-05-24 9:50 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-12-06 22:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-07 12:26 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-12-07 16:56 ` Hans de Goede
2021-12-07 17:29 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-07 17:54 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230522215348.uoyboow26n2o3tel@ripper \
--to=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=abhinavk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=khsieh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=varar@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).