linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine Abel Vesa
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

As both SDCC and UFS drivers use the ICE with duplicated implementation,
while none of the currently supported platforms make use concomitantly
of the same ICE IP block instance, the new SM8550 allows both UFS and
SDCC to do so. In order to support such scenario, there is a need for
a unified implementation and a devicetree node to be shared between
both types of storage devices. So lets drop the duplicate implementation
of the ICE from both SDCC and UFS and make it a dedicated (soc) driver.
Also, switch all UFS and SDCC devicetree nodes to use the new ICE
approach.

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * dropped the SDHCI dt-bindings patch as it will be added along
   with the first use of qcom,ice property from an SDHCI DT node

See each individual patch for changelogs.

Abel Vesa (6):
  dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine
  dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver
  scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
  mmc: sdhci-msm: Switch to the new ICE API
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node

 .../crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml     |  42 ++
 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml     |  19 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi          |  10 +
 drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig                      |   2 +-
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c                  | 220 +++--------
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig                      |   4 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile                     |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c                        | 365 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig                      |   2 +-
 drivers/ufs/host/Makefile                     |   4 +-
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c               | 244 ------------
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c                   |  97 ++++-
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h                   |  32 +-
 include/soc/qcom/ice.h                        |  37 ++
 14 files changed, 626 insertions(+), 453 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c
 delete mode 100644 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c
 create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/ice.h

-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle Abel Vesa
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Eric Biggers

Add schema file for new Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine driver.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-2-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * added Eric's R-b tag

Changes since v3:
 * added Krzysztof's R-b tag

Changes since v2:
 * moved the file to crypto dir
 * added soc specific compatible
 * dropped top level description
 * renamed node to crypto and dropped label in example

 .../crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml     | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..92e1d76e29ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. (QTI) Inline Crypto Engine
+
+maintainers:
+  - Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - enum:
+          - qcom,sm8550-inline-crypto-engine
+      - const: qcom,inline-crypto-engine
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.h>
+
+    crypto@1d88000 {
+      compatible = "qcom,sm8550-inline-crypto-engine",
+                   "qcom,inline-crypto-engine";
+      reg = <0x01d88000 0x8000>;
+      clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
+    };
+...
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-04  5:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver Abel Vesa
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-4-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
   it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it

Changes since v3:
 * dropped the "and drop core clock" part from subject line

Changes since v2:
 * dropped all changes except the qcom,ice property


 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
index c5a06c048389..874de31d2c41 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ properties:
   power-domains:
     maxItems: 1
 
+  qcom,ice:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+    description: phandle to the Inline Crypto Engine node
+
   reg:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 2
@@ -187,6 +191,21 @@ allOf:
 
     # TODO: define clock bindings for qcom,msm8994-ufshc
 
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - qcom,sm8550-ufshc
+    then:
+      properties:
+        qcom,ice:
+          maxItems: 1
+    else:
+      properties:
+        qcom,ice: false
+
+
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
 examples:
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-06 20:34   ` Eric Biggers
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API Abel Vesa
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

This takes the already existing duplicated support in both ufs-qcom
and sdhci-msm drivers and makes it a dedicated driver that can be used
by both mentioned drivers. The reason for this is because, staring with
SM8550, the ICE IP block is shared between UFS and SDCC, which means we
need to probe a dedicated device and share it between those two
consumers. So let's add the ICE dedicated driver as a soc driver.
Platforms that already have ICE supported, will use it as a library
as the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the
consumer device. This allows the backwards compatibility with old-style
devicetree approach. Also, add support to HW version 4.x since it
works out-of-the-box with the current driver. The 4.x HW version is
found on SM8550 platform.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-5-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * mentioned the addition of the 4.x HW version in the commit message
 * dropped np member from qcom_ice
 * made the error message from qcom_ice_wait_bist_status a single line
 * dropped clock enable call from qcom_ice_enable
 * changed comment in qcom_ice_program_key above the byte swap according
   to Bjorn's suggestion
 * made the qcom_ice_create function prototype a two-liner
 * changed the first argument of qcom_ice_create to simply device
 * added support for the legacy DT clocks name
 * changed the dev_info to dev_dbg in qcom_ice_create
 * added kernel doc above of_qcom_ice_get
 * made the comments in of_qcom_ice_get more explicit about how the
   legacy and the qcom,ice approach are handled
 * changed the error message on getting the ICE instance failure
 * added devlink between the consumer and the ICE instance in order to
   make sure the supplier doesn't get unbinded/removed from under the
   consumer
 * replace tab with space on the compatible line in the match table

Changes since v3:
 * dropped the "QCOM ICE v2.X only" comment
 * dropped question mark after "built-in self-test"
 * dropped comment above qcom_ice_check_supported implementation
 * allowed major version 4 as well, found on SM8550
 * renamed "enable" argument of __qcom_ice_enable to "enable_optimizations"
 * moved qcom_ice_enable implementation above qcom_ice_resume
 * initialized dev in qcom_ice_program_key and dropped assignment below
 * in ice.h, included types.h instead of err.h
 * in ice.h, dropped the #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE)
 * in ice.h, moved of_qcom_ice_get below qcom_ice_evict_key

Changes since v2:
 * reorganized the probe and of_qcom_ice_get to allow support for dts
   legacy approach
 * added suspend API to allow disabling the core clock when not in use
 * reworded the commit message to mention the way the legacy dts approach
   is supported
 * made the qcom_ice definition private to the driver

Changes since v1:
 * renamed filename to simply ice.c
 * kept all the copyrights from UFS and SDHC drivers
 * Used GENMASK like Konrad suggested
 * Fixed the comment about "ICE instance is supported currently",
   like Konrad suggested
 * Used FIELD_GET
 * Dropped extra comment from qcom_ice_low_power_mode_enable
 * Used lowercase in hex values
 * Dropped double space from comment above the qcom_ice_program_key
   function
 * Changed the dev_info about engine being registered to dev_dbg
 * Made the compatible entry in the match table a single line
 * Made the qcom_ice_driver definition consistent with respect to
   spaces/tabs
 * Switched QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE to tristate and made it built-in
   if any of the UFS or the SDHC drivers are built-in. This is to allow
   the API to be available even if the built-in driver doesn't have
   crypto enabled.
 * Dropped the engine container state. The of_qcom_ice_get will look up
   the ICE device based on the phandle and get the ICE data from dev
   data.
 * Dropped the supported field from qcom_ice definition.
 * Marked all funtions that are local as static.
 * Replaced qcom_ice_wait_bist_status function implementation with the
   one dropped from sdhci-msm.c
 * Added a separate function for key eviction


 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig  |   4 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile |   1 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c    | 365 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/soc/qcom/ice.h    |  37 ++++
 4 files changed, 407 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c
 create mode 100644 include/soc/qcom/ice.h

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
index a25df9e3c70e..a491718f8064 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -275,4 +275,8 @@ config QCOM_ICC_BWMON
 	  the fixed bandwidth votes from cpufreq (CPU nodes) thus achieve high
 	  memory throughput even with lower CPU frequencies.
 
+config QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE
+	tristate
+	select QCOM_SCM
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
index 6e88da899f60..0f43a88b4894 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile
@@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMHPD) += rpmhpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMPD) += rpmpd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_KRYO_L2_ACCESSORS) +=	kryo-l2-accessors.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_ICC_BWMON)	+= icc-bwmon.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE)	+= ice.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f92b8061a78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ice.c
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Qualcomm ICE (Inline Crypto Engine) support.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2013-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2019, Google LLC
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+
+#include <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h>
+
+#include <soc/qcom/ice.h>
+
+#define AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE			64
+
+/* QCOM ICE registers */
+#define QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION			0x0008
+#define QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING		0x0010
+#define QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS		0x0070
+#define QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL		0x1000
+
+/* BIST ("built-in self-test") status flags */
+#define QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK		GENMASK(31, 28)
+
+#define QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK		0x1
+#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK	0x2
+#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK	0x4
+
+#define qcom_ice_writel(engine, val, reg)	\
+	writel((val), (engine)->base + (reg))
+
+#define qcom_ice_readl(engine, reg)	\
+	readl((engine)->base + (reg))
+
+struct qcom_ice {
+	struct device *dev;
+	void __iomem *base;
+	struct device_link *link;
+
+	struct clk *core_clk;
+};
+
+static bool qcom_ice_check_supported(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	u32 regval = qcom_ice_readl(ice, QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION);
+	struct device *dev = ice->dev;
+	int major = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 24), regval);
+	int minor = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(23, 16), regval);
+	int step = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 0), regval);
+
+	/* For now this driver only supports ICE version 3 and 4. */
+	if (major != 3 && major != 4) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported ICE version: v%d.%d.%d\n",
+			 major, minor, step);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(dev, "Found QC Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) v%d.%d.%d\n",
+		 major, minor, step);
+
+	/* If fuses are blown, ICE might not work in the standard way. */
+	regval = qcom_ice_readl(ice, QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING);
+	if (regval & (QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK |
+		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK |
+		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK)) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "Fuses are blown; ICE is unusable!\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static void qcom_ice_low_power_mode_enable(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	u32 regval;
+
+	regval = qcom_ice_readl(ice, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
+
+	/* Enable low power mode sequence */
+	regval |= 0x7000;
+	qcom_ice_writel(ice, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
+}
+
+static void qcom_ice_optimization_enable(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	u32 regval;
+
+	/* ICE Optimizations Enable Sequence */
+	regval = qcom_ice_readl(ice, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
+	regval |= 0xd807100;
+	/* ICE HPG requires delay before writing */
+	udelay(5);
+	qcom_ice_writel(ice, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
+	udelay(5);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Wait until the ICE BIST (built-in self-test) has completed.
+ *
+ * This may be necessary before ICE can be used.
+ * Note that we don't really care whether the BIST passed or failed;
+ * we really just want to make sure that it isn't still running. This is
+ * because (a) the BIST is a FIPS compliance thing that never fails in
+ * practice, (b) ICE is documented to reject crypto requests if the BIST
+ * fails, so we needn't do it in software too, and (c) properly testing
+ * storage encryption requires testing the full storage stack anyway,
+ * and not relying on hardware-level self-tests.
+ */
+static int qcom_ice_wait_bist_status(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	u32 regval;
+	int err;
+
+	err = readl_poll_timeout(ice->base + QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS,
+				 regval, !(regval & QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK),
+				 50, 5000);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(ice->dev, "Timed out waiting for ICE self-test to complete\n");
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+int qcom_ice_enable(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	qcom_ice_low_power_mode_enable(ice);
+	qcom_ice_optimization_enable(ice);
+
+	return qcom_ice_wait_bist_status(ice);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_ice_enable);
+
+int qcom_ice_resume(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	struct device *dev = ice->dev;
+	int err;
+
+	err = clk_prepare_enable(ice->core_clk);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable core clock (%d)\n",
+			err);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	return qcom_ice_wait_bist_status(ice);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_ice_resume);
+
+int qcom_ice_suspend(struct qcom_ice *ice)
+{
+	clk_disable_unprepare(ice->core_clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_ice_suspend);
+
+int qcom_ice_program_key(struct qcom_ice *ice,
+			 u8 algorithm_id, u8 key_size,
+			 const u8 crypto_key[], u8 data_unit_size,
+			 int slot)
+{
+	struct device *dev = ice->dev;
+	union {
+		u8 bytes[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE];
+		u32 words[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE / sizeof(u32)];
+	} key;
+	int i;
+	int err;
+
+	/* Only AES-256-XTS has been tested so far. */
+	if (algorithm_id != QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS ||
+	    key_size != QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256) {
+		dev_err_ratelimited(dev,
+				    "Unhandled crypto capability; algorithm_id=%d, key_size=%d\n",
+				    algorithm_id, key_size);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(key.bytes, crypto_key, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE);
+
+	/* The SCM call requires that the key words are encoded in big endian */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key.words); i++)
+		__cpu_to_be32s(&key.words[i]);
+
+	err = qcom_scm_ice_set_key(slot, key.bytes, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE,
+				   QCOM_SCM_ICE_CIPHER_AES_256_XTS,
+				   data_unit_size);
+
+	memzero_explicit(&key, sizeof(key));
+
+	return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_ice_program_key);
+
+int qcom_ice_evict_key(struct qcom_ice *ice, int slot)
+{
+	return qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key(slot);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_ice_evict_key);
+
+static struct qcom_ice *qcom_ice_create(struct device *dev,
+					void __iomem *base)
+{
+	struct qcom_ice *engine;
+
+	if (!qcom_scm_is_available())
+		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+
+	if (!qcom_scm_ice_available()) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "ICE SCM interface not found\n");
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	engine = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*engine), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!engine)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	engine->dev = dev;
+	engine->base = base;
+
+	/*
+	 * Legacy DT binding uses different clk names for each consumer,
+	 * so lets try those first. If none of those are a match, it means
+	 * the we only have one clock and it is part of the dedicated DT node.
+	 * Also, enable the clock before we check what HW version the driver
+	 * supports.
+	 */
+	engine->core_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "ice_core_clk");
+	if (!engine->core_clk)
+		engine->core_clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "ice");
+	if (!engine->core_clk)
+		engine->core_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(engine->core_clk))
+		return ERR_CAST(engine->core_clk);
+
+	if (!qcom_ice_check_supported(engine))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "Registered Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine\n");
+
+	return engine;
+}
+
+/**
+ * of_qcom_ice_get() - get an ICE instance from a DT node
+ * @dev: device pointer for the consumer device
+ *
+ * This function will provide an ICE instance either by creating one for the
+ * consumer device if its DT node provides the 'ice' reg range and the 'ice'
+ * clock (for legacy DT style). On the other hand, if consumer provides a
+ * phandle via 'qcom,ice' property to an ICE DT, the ICE instance will already
+ * be created and so this function will return that instead.
+ *
+ * Return: ICE pointer on success, NULL if there is no ICE data provided by the
+ * consumer or ERR_PTR() on error.
+ */
+struct qcom_ice *of_qcom_ice_get(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+	struct qcom_ice *ice;
+	struct device_node *node;
+	struct resource *res;
+	void __iomem *base;
+
+	if (!dev || !dev->of_node)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+	/*
+	 * In order to support legacy style devicetree bindings, we need
+	 * to create the ICE instance using the consumer device and the reg
+	 * range called 'ice' it provides.
+	 */
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ice");
+	if (res) {
+		base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+		if (IS_ERR(base))
+			return ERR_CAST(base);
+
+		/* create ICE instance using consumer dev */
+		return qcom_ice_create(&pdev->dev, base);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If the consumer node does not provider an 'ice' reg range
+	 * (legacy DT binding), then it must at least provide a phandle
+	 * to the ICE devicetree node, otherwise ICE is not supported.
+	 */
+	node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "qcom,ice", 0);
+	if (!node)
+		return NULL;
+
+	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
+	if (!pdev) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Cannot find device node %s\n", node->name);
+		ice = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ice = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	if (!ice) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Cannot get ice instance from %s\n",
+			dev_name(&pdev->dev));
+		platform_device_put(pdev);
+		ice = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ice->link = device_link_add(dev, &pdev->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER);
+	if (!ice->link) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+			"Failed to create device link to consumer %s\n",
+			dev_name(dev));
+		ice = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+out:
+	of_node_put(node);
+
+	return ice;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_qcom_ice_get);
+
+static int qcom_ice_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct qcom_ice *engine;
+	void __iomem *base;
+
+	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(base)) {
+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "ICE registers not found\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(base);
+	}
+
+	engine = qcom_ice_create(&pdev->dev, base);
+	if (IS_ERR(engine))
+		return PTR_ERR(engine);
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, engine);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_ice_of_match_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,inline-crypto-engine" },
+	{ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_ice_of_match_table);
+
+static struct platform_driver qcom_ice_driver = {
+	.probe	= qcom_ice_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "qcom-ice",
+		.of_match_table = qcom_ice_of_match_table,
+	},
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(qcom_ice_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/ice.h b/include/soc/qcom/ice.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5870a94599a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/soc/qcom/ice.h
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
+ */
+
+#ifndef __QCOM_ICE_H__
+#define __QCOM_ICE_H__
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct qcom_ice;
+
+enum qcom_ice_crypto_key_size {
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_INVALID	= 0x0,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_128		= 0x1,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_192		= 0x2,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256		= 0x3,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_512		= 0x4,
+};
+
+enum qcom_ice_crypto_alg {
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS		= 0x0,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_BITLOCKER_AES_CBC	= 0x1,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_ECB		= 0x2,
+	QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_ESSIV_AES_CBC	= 0x3,
+};
+
+int qcom_ice_enable(struct qcom_ice *ice);
+int qcom_ice_resume(struct qcom_ice *ice);
+int qcom_ice_suspend(struct qcom_ice *ice);
+int qcom_ice_program_key(struct qcom_ice *ice,
+			 u8 algorithm_id, u8 key_size,
+			 const u8 crypto_key[], u8 data_unit_size,
+			 int slot);
+int qcom_ice_evict_key(struct qcom_ice *ice, int slot);
+struct qcom_ice *of_qcom_ice_get(struct device *dev);
+#endif /* __QCOM_ICE_H__ */
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-06 20:16   ` Eric Biggers
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Abel Vesa
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node Abel Vesa
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the ufs-qcom-ice and
use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc driver ice. The platforms
that already have ICE support will use the API as library since there will
not be a devicetree node, but instead they have reg range. In this case,
the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the consumer's
device. But if there are platforms that do not have ice reg in the
consumer devicetree node and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree
node, the of_qcom_ice_get will look up the device based on qcom,ice
property and will get the ICE instance registered by the probe function
of the ice driver.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-6-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * moved the setting of the UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO in the ufs_qcom_ice_init

Changes since v3:
 * since ufs-qcom-ice is being dropped, switch back to single file for CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM
 * handle properly the not-supported error returned by of_qcom_ice_get
 * drop cfg->crypto_cap_idx argument from qcom_ice_program_key call
 * added back the clearing of UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO and its checks in resume and enable

Changes since v2:
 * added the suspend API call for ICE
 * kept old wrappers over ICE API in

Changes since v1:
 * Added a check for supported algorithm and key size
   and passed the ICE defined values for algorithm and key size
 * Added call to evict function

 drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig        |   2 +-
 drivers/ufs/host/Makefile       |   4 +-
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c | 244 --------------------------------
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c     |  97 ++++++++++++-
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h     |  32 +----
 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 277 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
index 8793e3433580..16624ba08050 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ config SCSI_UFS_QCOM
 	depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM && ARCH_QCOM
 	depends on GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
 	depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
-	select QCOM_SCM if SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
+	select QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE if SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
 	help
 	  This selects the QCOM specific additions to UFSHCD platform driver.
 	  UFS host on QCOM needs some vendor specific configuration before
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile b/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile
index d7c5bf7fa512..4573aead02eb 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile
@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PCI) += tc-dwc-g210-pci.o ufshcd-dwc.o tc-dwc-g210.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC_TC_PLATFORM) += tc-dwc-g210-pltfrm.o ufshcd-dwc.o tc-dwc-g210.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CDNS_PLATFORM) += cdns-pltfrm.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM) += ufs_qcom.o
-ufs_qcom-y += ufs-qcom.o
-ufs_qcom-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO) += ufs-qcom-ice.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_QCOM) += ufs-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS) += ufs-exynos.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI) += ufshcd-pci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM) += ufshcd-pltfrm.o
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 453978877ae9..000000000000
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom-ice.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,244 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-/*
- * Qualcomm ICE (Inline Crypto Engine) support.
- *
- * Copyright (c) 2014-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
- * Copyright 2019 Google LLC
- */
-
-#include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h>
-
-#include "ufs-qcom.h"
-
-#define AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE			64
-
-/* QCOM ICE registers */
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_CONTROL			0x0000
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_RESET			0x0004
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION			0x0008
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING		0x0010
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_PARAMETERS_1		0x0014
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_PARAMETERS_2		0x0018
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_PARAMETERS_3		0x001C
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_PARAMETERS_4		0x0020
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_PARAMETERS_5		0x0024
-
-/* QCOM ICE v3.X only */
-#define QCOM_ICE_GENERAL_ERR_STTS		0x0040
-#define QCOM_ICE_INVALID_CCFG_ERR_STTS		0x0030
-#define QCOM_ICE_GENERAL_ERR_MASK		0x0044
-
-/* QCOM ICE v2.X only */
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_NON_SEC_IRQ_STTS		0x0040
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_NON_SEC_IRQ_MASK		0x0044
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_NON_SEC_IRQ_CLR		0x0048
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM1_ERROR_SYNDROME1	0x0050
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM1_ERROR_SYNDROME2	0x0054
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM2_ERROR_SYNDROME1	0x0058
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM2_ERROR_SYNDROME2	0x005C
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM1_BIST_ERROR_VEC	0x0060
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM2_BIST_ERROR_VEC	0x0064
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM1_BIST_FINISH_VEC	0x0068
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_STREAM2_BIST_FINISH_VEC	0x006C
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS		0x0070
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_BYPASS_STATUS		0x0074
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL		0x1000
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_ENDIAN_SWAP		0x1004
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_TEST_BUS_CONTROL		0x1010
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_TEST_BUS_REG		0x1014
-
-/* BIST ("built-in self-test"?) status flags */
-#define QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK		0xF0000000
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK		0x1
-#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK	0x2
-#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK	0x4
-
-#define qcom_ice_writel(host, val, reg)	\
-	writel((val), (host)->ice_mmio + (reg))
-#define qcom_ice_readl(host, reg)	\
-	readl((host)->ice_mmio + (reg))
-
-static bool qcom_ice_supported(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	struct device *dev = host->hba->dev;
-	u32 regval = qcom_ice_readl(host, QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION);
-	int major = regval >> 24;
-	int minor = (regval >> 16) & 0xFF;
-	int step = regval & 0xFFFF;
-
-	/* For now this driver only supports ICE version 3. */
-	if (major != 3) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported ICE version: v%d.%d.%d\n",
-			 major, minor, step);
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	dev_info(dev, "Found QC Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) v%d.%d.%d\n",
-		 major, minor, step);
-
-	/* If fuses are blown, ICE might not work in the standard way. */
-	regval = qcom_ice_readl(host, QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING);
-	if (regval & (QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK |
-		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK |
-		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK)) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "Fuses are blown; ICE is unusable!\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-	return true;
-}
-
-int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	struct ufs_hba *hba = host->hba;
-	struct device *dev = hba->dev;
-	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
-	struct resource *res;
-	int err;
-
-	if (!(ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_CAPABILITIES) &
-	      MASK_CRYPTO_SUPPORT))
-		return 0;
-
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ice");
-	if (!res) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "ICE registers not found\n");
-		goto disable;
-	}
-
-	if (!qcom_scm_ice_available()) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "ICE SCM interface not found\n");
-		goto disable;
-	}
-
-	host->ice_mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(host->ice_mmio)) {
-		err = PTR_ERR(host->ice_mmio);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	if (!qcom_ice_supported(host))
-		goto disable;
-
-	return 0;
-
-disable:
-	dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
-	hba->caps &= ~UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void qcom_ice_low_power_mode_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	u32 regval;
-
-	regval = qcom_ice_readl(host, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	/*
-	 * Enable low power mode sequence
-	 * [0]-0, [1]-0, [2]-0, [3]-E, [4]-0, [5]-0, [6]-0, [7]-0
-	 */
-	regval |= 0x7000;
-	qcom_ice_writel(host, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-}
-
-static void qcom_ice_optimization_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	u32 regval;
-
-	/* ICE Optimizations Enable Sequence */
-	regval = qcom_ice_readl(host, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	regval |= 0xD807100;
-	/* ICE HPG requires delay before writing */
-	udelay(5);
-	qcom_ice_writel(host, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	udelay(5);
-}
-
-int ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	if (!(host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO))
-		return 0;
-	qcom_ice_low_power_mode_enable(host);
-	qcom_ice_optimization_enable(host);
-	return ufs_qcom_ice_resume(host);
-}
-
-/* Poll until all BIST bits are reset */
-static int qcom_ice_wait_bist_status(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	int count;
-	u32 reg;
-
-	for (count = 0; count < 100; count++) {
-		reg = qcom_ice_readl(host, QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS);
-		if (!(reg & QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK))
-			break;
-		udelay(50);
-	}
-	if (reg)
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	if (!(host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO))
-		return 0;
-
-	err = qcom_ice_wait_bist_status(host);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(host->hba->dev, "BIST status error (%d)\n", err);
-		return err;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Program a key into a QC ICE keyslot, or evict a keyslot.  QC ICE requires
- * vendor-specific SCM calls for this; it doesn't support the standard way.
- */
-int ufs_qcom_ice_program_key(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-			     const union ufs_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg, int slot)
-{
-	union ufs_crypto_cap_entry cap;
-	union {
-		u8 bytes[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE];
-		u32 words[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE / sizeof(u32)];
-	} key;
-	int i;
-	int err;
-
-	if (!(cfg->config_enable & UFS_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE))
-		return qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key(slot);
-
-	/* Only AES-256-XTS has been tested so far. */
-	cap = hba->crypto_cap_array[cfg->crypto_cap_idx];
-	if (cap.algorithm_id != UFS_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS ||
-	    cap.key_size != UFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256) {
-		dev_err_ratelimited(hba->dev,
-				    "Unhandled crypto capability; algorithm_id=%d, key_size=%d\n",
-				    cap.algorithm_id, cap.key_size);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	memcpy(key.bytes, cfg->crypto_key, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE);
-
-	/*
-	 * The SCM call byte-swaps the 32-bit words of the key.  So we have to
-	 * do the same, in order for the final key be correct.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key.words); i++)
-		__cpu_to_be32s(&key.words[i]);
-
-	err = qcom_scm_ice_set_key(slot, key.bytes, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE,
-				   QCOM_SCM_ICE_CIPHER_AES_256_XTS,
-				   cfg->data_unit_size);
-	memzero_explicit(&key, sizeof(key));
-	return err;
-}
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index 82d02e7f3b4f..eb700ced884d 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
 #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
 #include <linux/devfreq.h>
 
+#include <soc/qcom/ice.h>
+
 #include <ufs/ufshcd.h>
 #include "ufshcd-pltfrm.h"
 #include <ufs/unipro.h>
@@ -55,6 +57,98 @@ static struct ufs_qcom_host *rcdev_to_ufs_host(struct reset_controller_dev *rcd)
 	return container_of(rcd, struct ufs_qcom_host, rcdev);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
+
+static inline void ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	if (host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO)
+		qcom_ice_enable(host->ice);
+}
+
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = host->hba;
+	struct device *dev = hba->dev;
+
+	host->ice = of_qcom_ice_get(dev);
+	if (host->ice == ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
+		host->ice = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(host->ice))
+		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(host->ice);
+
+	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	if (host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO)
+		return qcom_ice_resume(host->ice);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_suspend(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	if (host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO)
+		return qcom_ice_suspend(host->ice);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_program_key(struct ufs_hba *hba,
+				    const union ufs_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg,
+				    int slot)
+{
+	struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
+	union ufs_crypto_cap_entry cap;
+	bool config_enable =
+		cfg->config_enable & UFS_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE;
+
+	/* Only AES-256-XTS has been tested so far. */
+	cap = hba->crypto_cap_array[cfg->crypto_cap_idx];
+	if (cap.algorithm_id != UFS_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS ||
+	    cap.key_size != UFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (config_enable)
+		return qcom_ice_program_key(host->ice,
+					    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS,
+					    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256,
+					    cfg->crypto_key,
+					    cfg->data_unit_size, slot);
+	else
+		return qcom_ice_evict_key(host->ice, slot);
+}
+
+#else
+
+#define ufs_qcom_ice_program_key NULL
+
+static inline void ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+}
+
+static int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_suspend(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int ufs_qcom_host_clk_get(struct device *dev,
 		const char *name, struct clk **clk_out, bool optional)
 {
@@ -607,7 +701,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op,
 		ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(host);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	return ufs_qcom_ice_suspend(host);
 }
 
 static int ufs_qcom_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
@@ -853,7 +947,6 @@ static void ufs_qcom_set_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING | UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING;
 	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND;
 	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN;
-	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
 	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AGGR_POWER_COLLAPSE;
 	hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_RPM_AUTOSUSPEND;
 
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
index 39e774254fb2..6289ad5a42d0 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <soc/qcom/ice.h>
 #include <ufs/ufshcd.h>
 
 #define MAX_UFS_QCOM_HOSTS	1
@@ -205,12 +206,13 @@ struct ufs_qcom_host {
 	struct clk *tx_l1_sync_clk;
 	bool is_lane_clks_enabled;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
+	struct qcom_ice *ice;
+#endif
+
 	void __iomem *dev_ref_clk_ctrl_mmio;
 	bool is_dev_ref_clk_enabled;
 	struct ufs_hw_version hw_ver;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
-	void __iomem *ice_mmio;
-#endif
 
 	u32 dev_ref_clk_en_mask;
 
@@ -248,28 +250,4 @@ static inline bool ufs_qcom_cap_qunipro(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
 	return host->caps & UFS_QCOM_CAP_QUNIPRO;
 }
 
-/* ufs-qcom-ice.c */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
-int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host);
-int ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host);
-int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host);
-int ufs_qcom_ice_program_key(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-			     const union ufs_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg, int slot);
-#else
-static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_init(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_enable(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-static inline int ufs_qcom_ice_resume(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#define ufs_qcom_ice_program_key NULL
-#endif /* !CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO */
-
 #endif /* UFS_QCOM_H_ */
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-06 20:22   ` Eric Biggers
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node Abel Vesa
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the sdhci-msm ICE
implementation and use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc
driver ice. The platforms that already have ICE support will use the
API as library since there will not be a devicetree node, but instead
they have reg range. In this case, the of_qcom_ice_get will return an
ICE instance created for the consumer's device. But if there are
platforms that do not have ice reg in the consumer devicetree node
and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree node, theof_qcom_ice_get
will look up the device based on qcom,ice property and will get the ICE
instance registered by the probe function of the ice driver.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-7-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * none

Changes since v3:
 * added back the checks for and the setting of MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO
 * added enable/resume/suspend implementation for !CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
 * dropped cfg->crypto_cap_idx argument from qcom_ice_program_key

Changes since v2:
 * added the suspend API call for ICE
 * kept old wrappers over ICE API in

Changes since v1:
 * Added a check for supported algorithm and key size
   and passed the ICE defined values for algorithm and key size
 * Added call to evict function

 drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig     |   2 +-
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 220 +++++++----------------------------
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
index 4745fe217ade..09f837df5435 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_MSM
 	depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
 	select MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
 	select MMC_CQHCI
-	select QCOM_SCM if MMC_CRYPTO
+	select QCOM_INLINE_CRYPTO_ENGINE if MMC_CRYPTO
 	help
 	  This selects the Secure Digital Host Controller Interface (SDHCI)
 	  support present in Qualcomm SOCs. The controller supports
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 8ac81d57a3df..1a6e63b7af12 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
 #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
 
+#include <soc/qcom/ice.h>
+
 #include "sdhci-cqhci.h"
 #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
 #include "cqhci.h"
@@ -258,12 +260,14 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info {
 struct sdhci_msm_host {
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	void __iomem *core_mem;	/* MSM SDCC mapped address */
-	void __iomem *ice_mem;	/* MSM ICE mapped address (if available) */
 	int pwr_irq;		/* power irq */
 	struct clk *bus_clk;	/* SDHC bus voter clock */
 	struct clk *xo_clk;	/* TCXO clk needed for FLL feature of cm_dll*/
-	/* core, iface, cal, sleep, and ice clocks */
-	struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[5];
+	/* core, iface, cal and sleep clocks */
+	struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[4];
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
+	struct qcom_ice *ice;
+#endif
 	unsigned long clk_rate;
 	struct mmc_host *mmc;
 	bool use_14lpp_dll_reset;
@@ -1804,164 +1808,49 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
 
-#define AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE			64
-
-/* QCOM ICE registers */
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION			0x0008
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING		0x0010
-#define QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK		0x1
-#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK	0x2
-#define QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK	0x4
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS		0x0070
-#define QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK		0xF0000000
-
-#define QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL		0x1000
-
-#define sdhci_msm_ice_writel(host, val, reg)	\
-	writel((val), (host)->ice_mem + (reg))
-#define sdhci_msm_ice_readl(host, reg)	\
-	readl((host)->ice_mem + (reg))
-
-static bool sdhci_msm_ice_supported(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
-{
-	struct device *dev = mmc_dev(msm_host->mmc);
-	u32 regval = sdhci_msm_ice_readl(msm_host, QCOM_ICE_REG_VERSION);
-	int major = regval >> 24;
-	int minor = (regval >> 16) & 0xFF;
-	int step = regval & 0xFFFF;
-
-	/* For now this driver only supports ICE version 3. */
-	if (major != 3) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported ICE version: v%d.%d.%d\n",
-			 major, minor, step);
-		return false;
-	}
-
-	dev_info(dev, "Found QC Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) v%d.%d.%d\n",
-		 major, minor, step);
-
-	/* If fuses are blown, ICE might not work in the standard way. */
-	regval = sdhci_msm_ice_readl(msm_host, QCOM_ICE_REG_FUSE_SETTING);
-	if (regval & (QCOM_ICE_FUSE_SETTING_MASK |
-		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY0_SETTING_MASK |
-		      QCOM_ICE_FORCE_HW_KEY1_SETTING_MASK)) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "Fuses are blown; ICE is unusable!\n");
-		return false;
-	}
-	return true;
-}
-
-static inline struct clk *sdhci_msm_ice_get_clk(struct device *dev)
-{
-	return devm_clk_get(dev, "ice");
-}
-
 static int sdhci_msm_ice_init(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
 			      struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
 {
 	struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc;
 	struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
-	struct resource *res;
 
 	if (!(cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CAP) & CQHCI_CAP_CS))
 		return 0;
 
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(msm_host->pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
-					   "ice");
-	if (!res) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "ICE registers not found\n");
-		goto disable;
-	}
-
-	if (!qcom_scm_ice_available()) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "ICE SCM interface not found\n");
-		goto disable;
+	msm_host->ice = of_qcom_ice_get(dev);
+	if (msm_host->ice == ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
+		msm_host->ice = NULL;
 	}
 
-	msm_host->ice_mem = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ice_mem))
-		return PTR_ERR(msm_host->ice_mem);
-
-	if (!sdhci_msm_ice_supported(msm_host))
-		goto disable;
+	if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ice))
+		return PTR_ERR(msm_host->ice);
 
 	mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO;
-	return 0;
 
-disable:
-	dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void sdhci_msm_ice_low_power_mode_enable(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
-{
-	u32 regval;
-
-	regval = sdhci_msm_ice_readl(msm_host, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	/*
-	 * Enable low power mode sequence
-	 * [0]-0, [1]-0, [2]-0, [3]-E, [4]-0, [5]-0, [6]-0, [7]-0
-	 */
-	regval |= 0x7000;
-	sdhci_msm_ice_writel(msm_host, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-}
-
-static void sdhci_msm_ice_optimization_enable(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+static void sdhci_msm_ice_enable(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
 {
-	u32 regval;
-
-	/* ICE Optimizations Enable Sequence */
-	regval = sdhci_msm_ice_readl(msm_host, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	regval |= 0xD807100;
-	/* ICE HPG requires delay before writing */
-	udelay(5);
-	sdhci_msm_ice_writel(msm_host, regval, QCOM_ICE_REG_ADVANCED_CONTROL);
-	udelay(5);
+	if (msm_host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO)
+		qcom_ice_enable(msm_host->ice);
 }
 
-/*
- * Wait until the ICE BIST (built-in self-test) has completed.
- *
- * This may be necessary before ICE can be used.
- *
- * Note that we don't really care whether the BIST passed or failed; we really
- * just want to make sure that it isn't still running.  This is because (a) the
- * BIST is a FIPS compliance thing that never fails in practice, (b) ICE is
- * documented to reject crypto requests if the BIST fails, so we needn't do it
- * in software too, and (c) properly testing storage encryption requires testing
- * the full storage stack anyway, and not relying on hardware-level self-tests.
- */
-static int sdhci_msm_ice_wait_bist_status(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_ice_resume(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
 {
-	u32 regval;
-	int err;
+	if (msm_host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO)
+		return qcom_ice_resume(msm_host->ice);
 
-	err = readl_poll_timeout(msm_host->ice_mem + QCOM_ICE_REG_BIST_STATUS,
-				 regval, !(regval & QCOM_ICE_BIST_STATUS_MASK),
-				 50, 5000);
-	if (err)
-		dev_err(mmc_dev(msm_host->mmc),
-			"Timed out waiting for ICE self-test to complete\n");
-	return err;
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static void sdhci_msm_ice_enable(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_ice_suspend(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
 {
-	if (!(msm_host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO))
-		return;
-	sdhci_msm_ice_low_power_mode_enable(msm_host);
-	sdhci_msm_ice_optimization_enable(msm_host);
-	sdhci_msm_ice_wait_bist_status(msm_host);
-}
+	if (msm_host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO)
+		return qcom_ice_suspend(msm_host->ice);
 
-static int __maybe_unused sdhci_msm_ice_resume(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
-{
-	if (!(msm_host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO))
-		return 0;
-	return sdhci_msm_ice_wait_bist_status(msm_host);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1972,48 +1861,28 @@ static int sdhci_msm_program_key(struct cqhci_host *cq_host,
 				 const union cqhci_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg,
 				 int slot)
 {
-	struct device *dev = mmc_dev(cq_host->mmc);
+	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(cq_host->mmc);
+	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+	struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
 	union cqhci_crypto_cap_entry cap;
-	union {
-		u8 bytes[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE];
-		u32 words[AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE / sizeof(u32)];
-	} key;
-	int i;
-	int err;
-
-	if (!(cfg->config_enable & CQHCI_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE))
-		return qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key(slot);
 
 	/* Only AES-256-XTS has been tested so far. */
 	cap = cq_host->crypto_cap_array[cfg->crypto_cap_idx];
 	if (cap.algorithm_id != CQHCI_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS ||
-	    cap.key_size != CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256) {
-		dev_err_ratelimited(dev,
-				    "Unhandled crypto capability; algorithm_id=%d, key_size=%d\n",
-				    cap.algorithm_id, cap.key_size);
+		cap.key_size != CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	}
 
-	memcpy(key.bytes, cfg->crypto_key, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE);
-
-	/*
-	 * The SCM call byte-swaps the 32-bit words of the key.  So we have to
-	 * do the same, in order for the final key be correct.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key.words); i++)
-		__cpu_to_be32s(&key.words[i]);
-
-	err = qcom_scm_ice_set_key(slot, key.bytes, AES_256_XTS_KEY_SIZE,
-				   QCOM_SCM_ICE_CIPHER_AES_256_XTS,
-				   cfg->data_unit_size);
-	memzero_explicit(&key, sizeof(key));
-	return err;
+	if (cfg->config_enable & CQHCI_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE)
+		return qcom_ice_program_key(msm_host->ice,
+					    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS,
+					    QCOM_ICE_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256,
+					    cfg->crypto_key,
+					    cfg->data_unit_size, slot);
+	else
+		return qcom_ice_evict_key(msm_host->ice, slot);
 }
+
 #else /* CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO */
-static inline struct clk *sdhci_msm_ice_get_clk(struct device *dev)
-{
-	return NULL;
-}
 
 static inline int sdhci_msm_ice_init(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
 				     struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
@@ -2025,11 +1894,17 @@ static inline void sdhci_msm_ice_enable(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
 {
 }
 
-static inline int __maybe_unused
+static inline __maybe_unused int
 sdhci_msm_ice_resume(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static inline __maybe_unused int
+sdhci_msm_ice_suspend(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* !CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO */
 
 /*****************************************************************************\
@@ -2630,11 +2505,6 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		clk = NULL;
 	msm_host->bulk_clks[3].clk = clk;
 
-	clk = sdhci_msm_ice_get_clk(&pdev->dev);
-	if (IS_ERR(clk))
-		clk = NULL;
-	msm_host->bulk_clks[4].clk = clk;
-
 	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
 				      msm_host->bulk_clks);
 	if (ret)
@@ -2827,7 +2697,7 @@ static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(msm_host->bulk_clks),
 				   msm_host->bulk_clks);
 
-	return 0;
+	return sdhci_msm_ice_suspend(msm_host);
 }
 
 static __maybe_unused int sdhci_msm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node
  2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-03 20:05 ` Abel Vesa
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-03 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

Add support for UFS ICE by adding the qcom,ice property and the
ICE dedicated devicetree node. While at it, add the reg-name property
to the UFS HC node to be in line with older platforms.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---

The v4 is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/

Changes since v4:
 * none

Changes since v3:
 * none

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
index c6613654942a..dcfbbf33663a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
@@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,sm8550-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
 				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
 			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>;
+			reg-names = "std";
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
 			phy-names = "ufsphy";
@@ -1932,9 +1933,18 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
 				<0 0>,
 				<0 0>,
 				<0 0>;
+			qcom,ice = <&ice>;
+
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		ice: crypto@1d88000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm8550-inline-crypto-engine",
+				     "qcom,inline-crypto-engine";
+			reg = <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
+		};
+
 		tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
 			reg = <0 0x01f40000 0 0x20000>;
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-04  5:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  2023-04-04  8:59     ` Abel Vesa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2023-04-04  5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa, Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
	Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam, Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche,
	Adrian Hunter, James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen,
	Herbert Xu, David S . Miller, Eric Biggers
  Cc: linux-mmc, devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-crypto, linux-scsi

On 03/04/2023 22:05, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
> so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> The v4 is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-4-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> 
> Changes since v4:
>  * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
>    it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it

Why?

Also, this does not solve my previous question still.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-04  5:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2023-04-04  8:59     ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-04 10:12       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-04  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On 23-04-04 07:41:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/04/2023 22:05, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
> > so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > The v4 is here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-4-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> > 
> > Changes since v4:
> >  * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
> >    it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it
> 
> Why?

SM8550 will be the first platform to use the new DT bindings w.r.t ICE.

> 
> Also, this does not solve my previous question still.

Well, the clocks are not added for the a few platforms (which include
SM8550). Same for 'ice' reg range.. So the only thing left is to
enforce the qcom,ice property availability only for SM8550. I believe
it solves the mutual exclusiveness of the "ice" reg range along with the
clocks versus the qcom,ice property, by enforcing at compatible level.

Is this not enough?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-04  8:59     ` Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-04 10:12       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  2023-04-04 10:41         ` Abel Vesa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2023-04-04 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On 04/04/2023 10:59, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 23-04-04 07:41:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/04/2023 22:05, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
>>> so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The v4 is here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-4-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
>>>
>>> Changes since v4:
>>>  * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
>>>    it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it
>>
>> Why?
> 
> SM8550 will be the first platform to use the new DT bindings w.r.t ICE.

This I understand, but why other platforms cannot use it?

> 
>>
>> Also, this does not solve my previous question still.
> 
> Well, the clocks are not added for the a few platforms (which include
> SM8550). Same for 'ice' reg range.. So the only thing left is to
> enforce the qcom,ice property availability only for SM8550. I believe
> it solves the mutual exclusiveness of the "ice" reg range along with the
> clocks versus the qcom,ice property, by enforcing at compatible level.

Ah, I think I understand. That would work except I don't understand why
enforcing qcom,qce only for specific, new SoCs. Assuming it is a correct
hardware representation, we want it for everyone, don't we?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-04 10:12       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2023-04-04 10:41         ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-04 11:03           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-04 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On 23-04-04 12:12:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/04/2023 10:59, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 23-04-04 07:41:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 03/04/2023 22:05, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>> Starting with SM8550, the ICE will have its own devicetree node
> >>> so add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> The v4 is here:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230327134734.3256974-4-abel.vesa@linaro.org/
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v4:
> >>>  * Added check for sm8550 compatible w.r.t. qcom,ice in order to enforce
> >>>    it while making sure none of the other platforms are allowed to use it
> >>
> >> Why?
> > 
> > SM8550 will be the first platform to use the new DT bindings w.r.t ICE.
> 
> This I understand, but why other platforms cannot use it?

The platforms that do not have ICE support yet will be added in the same
subschema along with SM8550 when the ICE DT node will be added in their
dtsi.

> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Also, this does not solve my previous question still.
> > 
> > Well, the clocks are not added for the a few platforms (which include
> > SM8550). Same for 'ice' reg range.. So the only thing left is to
> > enforce the qcom,ice property availability only for SM8550. I believe
> > it solves the mutual exclusiveness of the "ice" reg range along with the
> > clocks versus the qcom,ice property, by enforcing at compatible level.
> 
> Ah, I think I understand. That would work except I don't understand why
> enforcing qcom,qce only for specific, new SoCs. Assuming it is a correct
> hardware representation, we want it for everyone, don't we?

Yes, but they will be added to the subschema (qcom,ice one) when their
their ICE support (ICE DT) will be added. This way, we keep the bindings
check without failures (for now).

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle
  2023-04-04 10:41         ` Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-04 11:03           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2023-04-04 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, Eric Biggers, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On 04/04/2023 12:41, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Also, this does not solve my previous question still.
>>>
>>> Well, the clocks are not added for the a few platforms (which include
>>> SM8550). Same for 'ice' reg range.. So the only thing left is to
>>> enforce the qcom,ice property availability only for SM8550. I believe
>>> it solves the mutual exclusiveness of the "ice" reg range along with the
>>> clocks versus the qcom,ice property, by enforcing at compatible level.
>>
>> Ah, I think I understand. That would work except I don't understand why
>> enforcing qcom,qce only for specific, new SoCs. Assuming it is a correct
>> hardware representation, we want it for everyone, don't we?
> 
> Yes, but they will be added to the subschema (qcom,ice one) when their
> their ICE support (ICE DT) will be added. This way, we keep the bindings
> check without failures (for now).

I understand that then you will rework this if:then case, so I think it
is just easier to make it correct from the first place. If there is
qcom,qce, then reg is maxItems:1. Otherwise - maxItems can be 2. You
achieve the same result, all DTS validate, without any need of further
changes later.


Best regards,
Krzysztof


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-06 20:16   ` Eric Biggers
  2023-04-07  7:02     ` Abel Vesa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2023-04-06 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

Hi Abel,

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the ufs-qcom-ice and
> use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc driver ice. The platforms
> that already have ICE support will use the API as library since there will
> not be a devicetree node, but instead they have reg range. In this case,
> the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the consumer's
> device. But if there are platforms that do not have ice reg in the
> consumer devicetree node and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree
> node, the of_qcom_ice_get will look up the device based on qcom,ice
> property and will get the ICE instance registered by the probe function
> of the ice driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>

This is still silent about how the ICE clock behavior is being changed.

I'm still trying to understand all this myself, so please bear with me, but my
understanding is that the UFS clocks can be disabled even while the host
controller is runtime-resumed.  This is called "clock gating" in the code.

Before, the ICE clock was just listed as one of the UFS clocks.  So, it was just
managed like the other UFS clocks.

Now, it appears that the ICE clock is always enabled while the host controller
is runtime-resumed.  So, this patch removes support for gating of the ICE clock.

Is that intended?

- Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-06 20:22   ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2023-04-06 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:29PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 8ac81d57a3df..1a6e63b7af12 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>  #include <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/interconnect.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>  
> +#include <soc/qcom/ice.h>

The include of <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h> should be removed.

>  static int sdhci_msm_ice_init(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
>  			      struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
>  {
>  	struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc;
>  	struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
> -	struct resource *res;
>  
>  	if (!(cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CAP) & CQHCI_CAP_CS))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	res = platform_get_resource_byname(msm_host->pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -					   "ice");
> -	if (!res) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "ICE registers not found\n");
> -		goto disable;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!qcom_scm_ice_available()) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "ICE SCM interface not found\n");
> -		goto disable;
> +	msm_host->ice = of_qcom_ice_get(dev);
> +	if (msm_host->ice == ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
> +		msm_host->ice = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	msm_host->ice_mem = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ice_mem))
> -		return PTR_ERR(msm_host->ice_mem);
> -
> -	if (!sdhci_msm_ice_supported(msm_host))
> -		goto disable;
> +	if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ice))
> +		return PTR_ERR(msm_host->ice);
>  
>  	mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO;
> -	return 0;
>  
> -disable:
> -	dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
>  	return 0;
>  }

This is sometimes setting MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO when ICE is unsupported.

BTW, it would be better to set not msm_host->ice until it's known that it will
have a valid value:

	ice = of_qcom_ice_get(dev);
	if (ice == ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP)) {
		dev_warn(dev, "Disabling inline encryption support\n");
		return 0;
	}
	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ice))
		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(ice);

	msm_host->ice = ice;
	mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO;
	return 0;

- Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver
  2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-06 20:34   ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2023-04-06 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:27PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> This takes the already existing duplicated support in both ufs-qcom
> and sdhci-msm drivers and makes it a dedicated driver that can be used
> by both mentioned drivers. The reason for this is because, staring with
> SM8550, the ICE IP block is shared between UFS and SDCC, which means we
> need to probe a dedicated device and share it between those two
> consumers. So let's add the ICE dedicated driver as a soc driver.
> Platforms that already have ICE supported, will use it as a library
> as the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the
> consumer device. This allows the backwards compatibility with old-style
> devicetree approach. Also, add support to HW version 4.x since it
> works out-of-the-box with the current driver. The 4.x HW version is
> found on SM8550 platform.

Can you please split up long paragraphs like this into multiple paragraphs?

> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> +	if (!pdev) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot find device node %s\n", node->name);
> +		ice = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ice = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	if (!ice) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot get ice instance from %s\n",
> +			dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> +		platform_device_put(pdev);
> +		ice = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ice->link = device_link_add(dev, &pdev->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER);
> +	if (!ice->link) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +			"Failed to create device link to consumer %s\n",
> +			dev_name(dev));
> +		ice = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}

Is a call to platform_device_put() missing above?

- Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-06 20:16   ` Eric Biggers
@ 2023-04-07  7:02     ` Abel Vesa
  2023-04-07 17:28       ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Abel Vesa @ 2023-04-07  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Biggers
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On 23-04-06 13:16:34, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Abel,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the ufs-qcom-ice and
> > use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc driver ice. The platforms
> > that already have ICE support will use the API as library since there will
> > not be a devicetree node, but instead they have reg range. In this case,
> > the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the consumer's
> > device. But if there are platforms that do not have ice reg in the
> > consumer devicetree node and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree
> > node, the of_qcom_ice_get will look up the device based on qcom,ice
> > property and will get the ICE instance registered by the probe function
> > of the ice driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> 
> This is still silent about how the ICE clock behavior is being changed.

Right, I'll add the some more info into the commit message about the
clock being handled by the ICE driver.

> 
> I'm still trying to understand all this myself, so please bear with me, but my
> understanding is that the UFS clocks can be disabled even while the host
> controller is runtime-resumed.  This is called "clock gating" in the code.

The ICE clock is now being controlled by the new driver.
> 
> Before, the ICE clock was just listed as one of the UFS clocks.  So, it was just
> managed like the other UFS clocks.
> 
> Now, it appears that the ICE clock is always enabled while the host controller
> is runtime-resumed.  So, this patch removes support for gating of the ICE clock.

I just tested this and it works as expected, which is:

ICE clock gets enable on qcom_ice_create (via *clk_get*_enabled) and
then, on the runtime suspend of the UFS, the qcom_ice_suspend is called
which will disable the clock. Then, every time UFS runtime
resumes/suspends the clock gets enabled/disabled.

Hope that makes sense.

Let me know if you think I'm missing something here.

> 
> Is that intended?
> 
> - Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API
  2023-04-07  7:02     ` Abel Vesa
@ 2023-04-07 17:28       ` Eric Biggers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2023-04-07 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Abel Vesa
  Cc: Ulf Hansson, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Andy Gross,
	Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Manivannan Sadhasivam,
	Alim Akhtar, Avri Altman, Bart Van Assche, Adrian Hunter,
	James E . J . Bottomley, Martin K . Petersen, Herbert Xu,
	David S . Miller, linux-mmc, devicetree,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-msm, linux-crypto,
	linux-scsi

On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 10:02:36AM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 23-04-06 13:16:34, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Hi Abel,
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > Now that there is a new dedicated ICE driver, drop the ufs-qcom-ice and
> > > use the new ICE api provided by the Qualcomm soc driver ice. The platforms
> > > that already have ICE support will use the API as library since there will
> > > not be a devicetree node, but instead they have reg range. In this case,
> > > the of_qcom_ice_get will return an ICE instance created for the consumer's
> > > device. But if there are platforms that do not have ice reg in the
> > > consumer devicetree node and instead provide a dedicated ICE devicetree
> > > node, the of_qcom_ice_get will look up the device based on qcom,ice
> > > property and will get the ICE instance registered by the probe function
> > > of the ice driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > 
> > This is still silent about how the ICE clock behavior is being changed.
> 
> Right, I'll add the some more info into the commit message about the
> clock being handled by the ICE driver.
> 
> > 
> > I'm still trying to understand all this myself, so please bear with me, but my
> > understanding is that the UFS clocks can be disabled even while the host
> > controller is runtime-resumed.  This is called "clock gating" in the code.
> 
> The ICE clock is now being controlled by the new driver.
> > 
> > Before, the ICE clock was just listed as one of the UFS clocks.  So, it was just
> > managed like the other UFS clocks.
> > 
> > Now, it appears that the ICE clock is always enabled while the host controller
> > is runtime-resumed.  So, this patch removes support for gating of the ICE clock.
> 
> I just tested this and it works as expected, which is:
> 
> ICE clock gets enable on qcom_ice_create (via *clk_get*_enabled) and
> then, on the runtime suspend of the UFS, the qcom_ice_suspend is called
> which will disable the clock. Then, every time UFS runtime
> resumes/suspends the clock gets enabled/disabled.
> 
> Hope that makes sense.
> 
> Let me know if you think I'm missing something here.
> 

Well, it's better than v4 and earlier of this patchset, where the clock was
never turned off.

But, this patchset still seems to be a regression from the status quo, since it
makes the ICE clock no longer be disabled when "UFS clock gating" disables the
other UFS clocks.  Instead, it will only be disabled on runtime-suspend.

Now, I don't know whether anyone ever confirmed that the current behavior is
actually optimal and works as intended.  So, it *might* actually be fine to
change it!  But I was hoping that you at least had some thoughts about this,
whereas currently this patchset just ignores the issue entirely.

- Eric

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-07 17:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-03 20:05 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add dedicated Qcom ICE driver Abel Vesa
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: Add Qualcomm Inline Crypto Engine Abel Vesa
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add ICE phandle Abel Vesa
2023-04-04  5:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-04  8:59     ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-04 10:12       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-04 10:41         ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-04 11:03           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] soc: qcom: Make the Qualcomm UFS/SDCC ICE a dedicated driver Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:34   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Switch to the new ICE API Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:16   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-07  7:02     ` Abel Vesa
2023-04-07 17:28       ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Abel Vesa
2023-04-06 20:22   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-03 20:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add the Inline Crypto Engine node Abel Vesa

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).