linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpuidle states
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:20:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0c008e9-030b-545e-a683-97f1a2bc88e5@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161406655568.1254594.10659725128997811651@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>

Hi Stephen,

On 2/23/2021 1:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-02-11 23:28:50)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index 8f2002b..3b86052 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -186,12 +207,69 @@
>>                          compatible = "arm,kryo";
>>                          reg = <0x0 0x700>;
>>                          enable-method = "psci";
>> +                       cpu-idle-states = <&BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0
>> +                                          &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
>> +                                          &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
>>                          next-level-cache = <&L2_700>;
>>                          L2_700: l2-cache {
>>                                  compatible = "cache";
>>                                  next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>>                          };
>>                  };
>> +
>> +               idle-states {
>> +                       entry-method = "psci";
>> +
>> +                       LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0-0 {
>> +                               compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>> +                               idle-state-name = "little-power-down";
>> +                               arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x40000003>;
>> +                               entry-latency-us = <549>;
>> +                               exit-latency-us = <901>;
>> +                               min-residency-us = <1774>;
> Are these preliminary numbers? They're the same as sc7180 from what I
> can tell, but presumably things changed between SoC versions?

yes they are preliminary numbers, we are yet to measure on sc7280 and 
will update later once measured.

Thanks,
Maulik
>
>> +                               local-timer-stop;
>> +                       };
>> +
>> +                       LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1: cpu-sleep-0-1 {
>> +                               compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>> +                               idle-state-name = "little-rail-power-down";
>> +                               arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x40000004>;
>> +                               entry-latency-us = <702>;
>> +                               exit-latency-us = <915>;
>> +                               min-residency-us = <4001>;
>> +                               local-timer-stop;
>> +                       };
>> +
>> +                       BIG_CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-1-0 {
>> +                               compatible = "arm,idle-state";
>> +                               idle-state-name = "big-power-down";
>> +                               arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x40000003>;
>> +                               entry-latency-us = <523>;
>> +                               exit-latency-us = <1244>;
>> +                               min-residency-us = <2207>;

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12  7:28 [PATCH 00/13] Add binding updates and DT files for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document SC7280 SoC and board Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05 20:08   ` Rob Herring
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 02/13] dt-bindings: firmware: scm: Add SC7280 support Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:50   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05 20:08   ` Rob Herring
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 03/13] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add basic dts/dtsi files for SC7280 soc Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:37   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-23 11:42     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 04/13] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Add compatible for sc7280 Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:38   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-23  7:39   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-05  5:46     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 05/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:41   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 06/13] arm64: dts: qcom: SC7280: Add rpmhcc clock controller node Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-01 17:27     ` Taniya Das
2021-03-03  8:21       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 07/13] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 08/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device node for APPS SMMU Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 09/13] arm64: dts: qcom: Add reserved memory for fw Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-23 11:45     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 10/13] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add compatible for SC7280 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 11/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add APSS watchdog node Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add SPMI PMIC arbiter device for SC7280 Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-12  7:28 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpuidle states Rajendra Nayak
2021-02-23  7:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-23 11:50     ` Maulik Shah [this message]
2021-03-11  0:13 ` [PATCH 00/13] Add binding updates and DT files for SC7280 SoC Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-11  9:15   ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-11 11:35     ` Rajendra Nayak
2021-03-11 16:44     ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0c008e9-030b-545e-a683-97f1a2bc88e5@codeaurora.org \
    --to=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).