linux-bcache.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: colyli@suse.de
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] bcache: use delayed kworker fo asynchronous devices registration
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:53:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200614165333.124999-4-colyli@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200614165333.124999-1-colyli@suse.de>

From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>

This patch changes the asynchronous registration kworker to a delayed
kworker. There is probability queue_work() queues the async registration
kworker to the same CPU (even though very little), then the process
which writing sysfs interface to reigster bcache device may won't return
immeidately. queue_delayed_work() in this patch will delay 10 jiffies
before insert the kworker to run queue, which makes sure the registering
process may always returns to user space in time.

Fixes: 9e23ccf8f0a22 ("bcache: asynchronous devices registration")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 904ea9bbb5c4..a6e79083010a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/genhd.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
@@ -2380,7 +2381,7 @@ static bool bch_is_open(struct block_device *bdev)
 }
 
 struct async_reg_args {
-	struct work_struct reg_work;
+	struct delayed_work reg_work;
 	char *path;
 	struct cache_sb *sb;
 	struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk;
@@ -2391,7 +2392,7 @@ static void register_bdev_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	int fail = false;
 	struct async_reg_args *args =
-		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work);
+		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work.work);
 	struct cached_dev *dc;
 
 	dc = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2421,7 +2422,7 @@ static void register_cache_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	int fail = false;
 	struct async_reg_args *args =
-		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work);
+		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work.work);
 	struct cache *ca;
 
 	ca = kzalloc(sizeof(*ca), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2449,11 +2450,12 @@ static void register_cache_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 static void register_device_aync(struct async_reg_args *args)
 {
 	if (SB_IS_BDEV(args->sb))
-		INIT_WORK(&args->reg_work, register_bdev_worker);
+		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&args->reg_work, register_bdev_worker);
 	else
-		INIT_WORK(&args->reg_work, register_cache_worker);
+		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&args->reg_work, register_cache_worker);
 
-	queue_work(system_wq, &args->reg_work);
+	/* 10 jiffies is enough for a delay */
+	queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &args->reg_work, 10);
 }
 
 static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
-- 
2.25.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-14 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-14 16:53 [PATCH 0/4] bcache: more fixes for v5.8-rc1 colyli
2020-06-14 16:53 ` colyli
2020-06-14 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] bcache: fix potential deadlock problem in btree_gc_coalesce colyli
2020-06-14 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] bcache: check and adjust logical block size for backing devices colyli
2020-06-14 16:53 ` colyli [this message]
2020-06-14 16:53   ` [PATCH 3/4] bcache: use delayed kworker fo asynchronous devices registration colyli
2020-06-15  6:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-15  6:12     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-14 16:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] bcache: pr_info() format clean up in bcache_device_init() colyli
2020-06-14 16:53   ` colyli
2020-06-14 22:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] bcache: more fixes for v5.8-rc1 Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200614165333.124999-4-colyli@suse.de \
    --to=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).