From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bart.vanassche@wdc.com,
ming.lei@redhat.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, jikos@kernel.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
jgross@suse.com, todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com,
nborisov@suse.com, jack@suse.cz, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
ONeukum@suse.com, oleksandr@natalenko.name,
oleg.b.antonyan@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] ext4: add fs freezing support on suspend/hibernation
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:59:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003195930.ivgaccdabxczar62@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171003185313.1017-5-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:53:12AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> @@ -4926,7 +4926,7 @@ static int ext4_unfreeze(struct super_block *sb)
> ext4_set_feature_journal_needs_recovery(sb);
> }
>
> - ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
> + ext4_commit_super(sb, 0);
> return 0;
> }
>
After we remove add the NEEDS_RECOVERY flag, we need to make sure
recovery flag is pushed out to disk before any other changes are
allowed to be pushed out to disk. That's why we originally did the
update synchronously.
There are other ways we could fulfill this requirements, but doing a
synchronous update is the simplest way to handle this. Was it
necessary to change this given the other changes you are making the fs
freeze implementation?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 18:53 [RFC 0/5] fs: replace kthread freezing with filesystem freeze/thaw Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 18:53 ` [RFC 1/5] fs: add iterate_supers_reverse() Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 18:53 ` [RFC 2/5] fs: freeze on suspend and thaw on resume Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-03 20:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-03 20:39 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:06 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 20:58 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 21:16 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 18:53 ` [RFC 3/5] xfs: allow fs freeze on suspend/hibernation Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 18:53 ` [RFC 4/5] ext4: add fs freezing support " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 19:59 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2017-10-03 20:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-04 1:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-04 7:05 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 15:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-04 16:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-04 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 18:53 ` [RFC 5/5] pm: remove kernel thread freezing Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 18:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-03 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-04 0:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-04 1:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-11-29 23:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-04 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 20:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-03 20:15 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 20:21 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-03 20:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-03 20:57 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-03 21:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 21:09 ` Shuah Khan
2017-10-03 21:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-06 12:07 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-06 12:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-03 20:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-03 20:17 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 20:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-03 20:24 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 20:27 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:51 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-03 21:04 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 21:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-04 6:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-03 19:33 ` [RFC 0/5] fs: replace kthread freezing with filesystem freeze/thaw Ming Lei
2017-10-03 20:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-10-03 20:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-10-03 20:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-04 15:43 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003195930.ivgaccdabxczar62@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ONeukum@suse.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=oleg.b.antonyan@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).