linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@bytedance.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, fam@euphon.net, paolo.valente@linaro.org,
	duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	tj@kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	zhangjiachen.jc@bytedance.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] bfq: Fix the missing barrier in __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio
Date: Mon,  5 Aug 2019 14:38:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190805063807.9494-2-zhengfeiran@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190805063807.9494-1-zhengfeiran@bytedance.com>

The comment of bfq_group_set_weight says the reading of prio_changed
should happen before the reading of weight, but a memory barrier is
missing here. Add it now, to match the smp_wmb() there.

Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@bytedance.com>
---
 block/bfq-wf2q.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
index c9ba225081ce..05f0bf4a1144 100644
--- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
+++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
@@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio(struct bfq_service_tree *old_st,
 		}
 #endif
 
+		/* Matches the smp_wmb() in bfq_group_set_weight. */
+		smp_rmb();
 		old_st->wsum -= entity->weight;
 
 		if (entity->new_weight != entity->orig_weight) {
-- 
2.11.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-05  6:38 [PATCH v2 0/3] Implement BFQ per-device weight interface Fam Zheng
2019-08-05  6:38 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2019-08-05  6:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] bfq: Extract bfq_group_set_weight from bfq_io_set_weight_legacy Fam Zheng
2019-08-05  6:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] bfq: Add per-device weight Fam Zheng
2019-08-21 15:44   ` Tejun Heo
2019-08-26  6:36     ` Paolo Valente
2019-08-26 13:59       ` Jens Axboe
2019-08-28  3:50         ` Fam Zheng
2019-08-05 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Implement BFQ per-device weight interface Paolo Valente

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190805063807.9494-2-zhengfeiran@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhengfeiran@bytedance.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangjiachen.jc@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).