From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:52:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55743a51-4d6f-f481-cebf-e2af9c657911@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIbS1dgSYrsAeGvZ@T590>
On 26/04/2021 15:48, Ming Lei wrote:
>> --0.56%--sbitmap_get
>>
>> I don't see this for hostwide tags - this may be because we have multiple
>> hctx, and the IO sched tags are per hctx, so less chance of exhaustion. But
>> this is not from hostwide tags specifically, but for multiple HW queues in
>> general. As I understood, sched tags were meant to be per request queue,
>> right? I am reading this correctly?
> sched tags is still per-hctx.
>
> I just found that you didn't change sched tags into per-request-queue
> shared tags.
> Then for hostwide tags, each hctx still has its own
> standalone sched tags and request pool, that is one big difference with
> non hostwide tags.
For both hostwide and non-hostwide tags, we have standalone sched tags
and request pool per hctx when q->nr_hw_queues > 1.
> That is why you observe that scheduler tag exhaustion
> is easy to trigger in case of non-hostwide tags.
>
> I'd suggest to add one per-request-queue sched tags, and make all hctxs
> sharing it, just like what you did for driver tag.
>
That sounds reasonable.
But I don't see how this is related to hostwide tags specifically, but
rather just having q->nr_hw_queues > 1, which NVMe PCI and some other
SCSI MQ HBAs have (without using hostwide tags).
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 7:50 [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:10 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 10:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:42 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 11:12 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 12:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-15 3:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 10:41 ` John Garry
2021-04-15 12:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 15:41 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 0:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 8:29 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 8:39 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 14:59 ` John Garry
2021-04-20 3:06 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 3:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-20 4:54 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 6:52 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-20 20:22 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-23 8:43 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 10:53 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 14:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 15:52 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-04-26 16:03 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 17:02 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 23:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 7:52 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:11 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 9:37 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:52 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 10:15 ` John Garry
2021-07-07 17:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 13:59 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 17:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-14 18:19 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 19:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-15 0:58 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55743a51-4d6f-f481-cebf-e2af9c657911@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).