From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:52:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFj5m9LPe=TdJgz2iJ7U6UT4=x-5aE=YbRgOQ80RHfpp62GQQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <993c3ae5-a7e2-aa6d-a6f3-147f06e9d015@interlog.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:54 PM Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-04-19 11:22 p.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 4/19/21 8:06 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >> I have always suspected under extreme pressure the block layer (or scsi
> >> mid-level) does strange things, like an IO hang, attempts to prove that
> >> usually lead back to my own code :-). But I have one example recently
> >> where upwards of 10 commands had been submitted (blk_execute_rq_nowait())
> >> and the following one stalled (all on the same thread). Seconds later
> >> those 10 commands reported DID_TIME_OUT, the stalled thread awoke, and
> >> my dd variant went to its conclusion (reporting 10 errors). Following
> >> copies showed no ill effects.
> >>
> >> My weapons of choice are sg_dd, actually sgh_dd and sg_mrq_dd. Those last
> >> two monitor for stalls during the copy. Each submitted READ and WRITE
> >> command gets its pack_id from an incrementing atomic and a management
> >> thread in those copies checks every 300 milliseconds that that atomic
> >> value is greater than the previous check. If not, dump the state of the
> >> sg driver. The stalled request was in busy state with a timeout of 1
> >> nanosecond which indicated that blk_execute_rq_nowait() had not been
> >> called. So the chief suspect would be blk_get_request() followed by
> >> the bio setup calls IMO.
> >>
> >> So it certainly looked like an IO hang, not a locking, resource nor
> >> corruption issue IMO. That was with a branch off MKP's
> >> 5.13/scsi-staging branch taken a few weeks back. So basically
> >> lk 5.12.0-rc1 .
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > If it would be possible to develop a script that reproduces this hang and
> > if that script can be shared I will help with root-causing and fixing this
> > hang.
>
> Possible, but not very practical:
> 1) apply supplied 83 patches to sg driver
> 2) apply pending patch to scsi_debug driver
> 3) find a stable kernel platform (perhaps not lk 5.12.0-rc1)
> 4) run supplied scripts for three weeks
> 5) dig through the output and maybe find one case (there were lots
> of EAGAINs from blk_get_request() but they are expected when
> thrashing the storage layers)
Or collecting the debugfs log after IO hang is triggered in your test:
(cd /sys/kernel/debug/block/$SDEV && find . -type f -exec grep -aH . {} \;)
$SDEV is the disk on which IO hang is observed.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 7:50 [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:10 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 10:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:42 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 11:12 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 12:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-15 3:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 10:41 ` John Garry
2021-04-15 12:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 15:41 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 0:46 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 8:29 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 8:39 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 14:59 ` John Garry
2021-04-20 3:06 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 3:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-20 4:54 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20 6:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-20 20:22 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-21 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-23 8:43 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 10:53 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 14:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 15:52 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 16:03 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 17:02 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 23:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 7:52 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:11 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 9:37 ` John Garry
2021-04-27 9:52 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 10:15 ` John Garry
2021-07-07 17:06 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 13:59 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 17:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-14 18:19 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 19:39 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-15 0:58 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFj5m9LPe=TdJgz2iJ7U6UT4=x-5aE=YbRgOQ80RHfpp62GQQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).