linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	don.brace@microsemi.com, Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de,
	Shivasharan Srikanteshwara 
	<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com,
	"PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" <megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters to MQ
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:55:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5adffdf805179428bdd0dd6c293a4f7d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200805084031.GA1995289@T590>

> > Ming -
> >
> > I noted your comments.
> >
> > I have completed testing and this particular latest performance issue
> > on Volume is outstanding.
> > Currently it is 20-25% performance drop in IOPs and we want that to be
> > closed before shared host tag is enabled for <megaraid_sas> driver.
> > Just for my understanding - What will be the next steps on this ?
> >
> > I can validate any new approach/patch for this issue.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> What do you think of the following patch?

I tested this patch. I still see IO hang.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c index
> c866a4f33871..49f0fc5c7a63 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -552,8 +552,24 @@ static void scsi_run_queue_async(struct scsi_device
> *sdev)
>  	if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun ||
>  	    !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list))
>  		kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
> -	else
> -		blk_mq_run_hw_queues(sdev->request_queue, true);
> +	else {
> +		/*
> +		 * smp_mb() implied in either rq->end_io or
> blk_mq_free_request
> +		 * is for ordering writing .device_busy in
scsi_device_unbusy()
> +		 * and reading sdev->restarts.
> +		 */
> +		int old = atomic_read(&sdev->restarts);
> +
> +		if (old) {
> +			blk_mq_run_hw_queues(sdev->request_queue, true);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * ->restarts has to be kept as non-zero if there
is
> +			 *  new budget contention comes.
> +			 */
> +			atomic_cmpxchg(&sdev->restarts, old, 0);
> +		}
> +	}
>  }
>
>  /* Returns false when no more bytes to process, true if there are more
*/
> @@ -1612,8 +1628,34 @@ static void scsi_mq_put_budget(struct
> request_queue *q)  static bool scsi_mq_get_budget(struct request_queue
*q)
> {
>  	struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
> +	int ret = scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev);
>
> -	return scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If all in-flight requests originated from this LUN are
completed
> +	 * before setting .restarts, sdev->device_busy will be observed as
> +	 * zero, then blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() will dispatch this
request
> +	 * soon. Otherwise, completion of one of these request will
observe
> +	 * the .restarts flag, and the request queue will be run for
handling
> +	 * this request, see scsi_end_request().
> +	 */
> +	atomic_inc(&sdev->restarts);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Order writing .restarts and reading .device_busy, and make sure
> +	 * .restarts is visible to scsi_end_request(). Its pair is implied
by
> +	 * __blk_mq_end_request() in scsi_end_request() for ordering
> +	 * writing .device_busy in scsi_device_unbusy() and reading
.restarts.
> +	 *
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +
> +	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) == 0 &&
> +				!scsi_device_blocked(sdev)))
> +		blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(sdev->request_queue,
> SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);

Hi Ming -

There is still some race which is not handled.  Take a case of IO is not
able to get budget and it has already marked <restarts> flag.
<restarts> flag will be seen non-zero in completion path and completion
path will attempt h/w queue run. (But this particular IO is still not in
s/w queue.).
Attempt of running h/w queue from completion path will not flush any IO
since there is no IO in s/w queue.

I think above code is added assuming it should manage this particular
case, but this code also does not help. If some IO in between submitted
directly to the h/w queue then sdev->device_busy will be non-zero.
	
If I move above section of the code into completion path, IO hang is
resolved.  I also verify performance -

Multi Drive R0 	1 workers per VD gives	662K prior to this patch and now
It scale to 1.1M IOPs. (90% improvement)
Multi Drive R0  4 workers per VD gives 1.9M prior to this patch and now It
scale to 3.1M IOPs. (50% improvement)

Here is modified patch -

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 6f50e5c..dcdc5f6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -594,8 +594,26 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req,
blk_status_t error,
        if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun ||
            !list_empty(&sdev->host->starved_list))
                kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
-       else
-               blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
+       else {
+               /*
+                * smp_mb() implied in either rq->end_io or
blk_mq_free_request
+                * is for ordering writing .device_busy in
scsi_device_unbusy()
+                * and reading sdev->restarts.
+                */
+               int old = atomic_read(&sdev->restarts);
+
+               if (old) {
+                       blk_mq_run_hw_queues(sdev->request_queue, true);
+
+                       /*
+                        * ->restarts has to be kept as non-zero if there
is
+                        *  new budget contention comes.
+                        */
+                       atomic_cmpxchg(&sdev->restarts, old, 0);
+               } else if (unlikely(atomic_read(&sdev->device_busy) == 0
&&
+                                       !scsi_device_blocked(sdev)))
+                       blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(sdev->request_queue,
SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY);
+       }

        percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter);
        return false;
@@ -1615,8 +1633,31 @@ static bool scsi_mq_get_budget(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx)
 {
        struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
        struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
+       int ret = scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev);
+
+       if (ret)
+               return true;

-       return scsi_dev_queue_ready(q, sdev);
+       /*
+        * If all in-flight requests originated from this LUN are
completed
+        * before setting .restarts, sdev->device_busy will be observed as
+        * zero, then blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() will dispatch this
request
+        * soon. Otherwise, completion of one of these request will
observe
+        * the .restarts flag, and the request queue will be run for
handling
+        * this request, see scsi_end_request().
+        */
+       atomic_inc(&sdev->restarts);
+
+       /*
+        * Order writing .restarts and reading .device_busy, and make sure
+        * .restarts is visible to scsi_end_request(). Its pair is implied
by
+        * __blk_mq_end_request() in scsi_end_request() for ordering
+        * writing .device_busy in scsi_device_unbusy() and reading
.restarts.
+        *
+        */
+       smp_mb__after_atomic();
+
+       return false;
 }

 static blk_status_t scsi_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index bc59090..ac45058 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ struct scsi_device {

        atomic_t device_busy;           /* commands actually active on
LLDD */
        atomic_t device_blocked;        /* Device returned QUEUE_FULL. */
-
+
+       atomic_t restarts;
        spinlock_t list_lock;
        struct list_head starved_entry;
        unsigned short queue_depth;     /* How deep of a queue we want */

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-06 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:29 [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/12] blk-mq: rename BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED as BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/12] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth() John Garry
2020-06-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11  8:26     ` John Garry
2020-06-23 11:25       ` John Garry
2020-06-23 14:23         ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-24  8:13           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-29 16:18             ` John Garry
2020-08-10 16:51           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:01             ` John Garry
2020-08-11 16:34               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/12] blk-mq: Use pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/12] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset John Garry
2020-06-11  3:37   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:09     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-06-11  4:04   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:33     ` John Garry
2020-06-12  6:06       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-29 15:32         ` About sbitmap_bitmap_show() and cleared bits (was Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap) John Garry
2020-06-30  6:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-30  7:30             ` John Garry
2020-06-30 11:36               ` John Garry
2020-06-30 14:55           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  9:41         ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-07-13 12:20           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/12] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/12] scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters " John Garry
2020-07-02 10:23   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-06  8:23     ` John Garry
2020-07-06  8:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06  9:26         ` John Garry
2020-07-06  9:40           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06 19:19       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07  7:58         ` John Garry
2020-07-07 14:45           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07 16:17             ` John Garry
2020-07-09 19:01               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-10  8:10                 ` John Garry
2020-07-13  7:55                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-13  8:42                     ` John Garry
2020-07-19 19:07                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  7:23                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  9:18                         ` John Garry
2020-07-21  1:13                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-21  6:53                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  4:12                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  5:30                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  8:04                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  9:32                                   ` John Garry
2020-07-23 14:07                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-23 17:29                                       ` John Garry
2020-07-24  2:47                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  7:54                                           ` John Garry
2020-07-28  8:45                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29  5:25                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-29 15:36                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29 18:31                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-04  8:36                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-04  9:27                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-05  8:40                                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 10:25                                                           ` Kashyap Desai [this message]
2020-08-06 13:38                                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 14:37                                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 15:29                                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-08 19:05                                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-09  2:16                                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-10 16:38                                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:09                                                                         ` John Garry
2020-08-04 17:00                                               ` John Garry
2020-08-05  2:56                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  8:01                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-08 11:31         ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/12] smartpqi: enable host tagset John Garry
2020-07-14 13:16   ` John Garry
2020-07-14 13:31     ` John Garry
2020-07-14 18:16       ` Don.Brace
2020-07-15  7:28         ` John Garry
2020-07-14 14:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-18  8:33       ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ John Garry
2020-07-14  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-07-14  7:41     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14  7:52       ` John Garry
2020-07-14  8:06         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14  9:53           ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:14             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:43               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:19             ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:35               ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:44               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:52                 ` John Garry
2020-07-14 12:04                   ` Ming Lei
2020-08-03 20:39         ` Don.Brace
2020-08-04  9:27           ` John Garry
2020-08-04 15:18             ` Don.Brace
2020-08-05 11:21               ` John Garry
2020-08-14 21:04                 ` Don.Brace
2020-08-17  8:00                   ` John Garry
2020-08-17 18:39                     ` Don.Brace
2020-08-18  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-16 16:14     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-16 19:45     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-17 10:11       ` John Garry
2020-06-11  3:07 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs Ming Lei
2020-06-11  9:35   ` John Garry
2020-06-12 18:47     ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-15  2:13       ` Ming Lei
2020-06-15  6:57         ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-16  1:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-06-17 11:26             ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-22  6:24               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-23  0:55                 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-23 11:50                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-23 12:11                   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5adffdf805179428bdd0dd6c293a4f7d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).