linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	<kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>, <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	<bvanassche@acm.org>, <hare@suse.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
	<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<esc.storagedev@microsemi.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	<megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:22:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a5dcb3a-8f5c-ab10-7631-4bd1b58b49bb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611040455.GD453671@T590>

>> +static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_shared_sbitmap_attrs[] = {
>> +	{"state", 0400, hctx_state_show},
>> +	{"flags", 0400, hctx_flags_show},
>> +	{"dispatch", 0400, .seq_ops = &hctx_dispatch_seq_ops},
>> +	{"busy", 0400, hctx_busy_show},
>> +	{"ctx_map", 0400, hctx_ctx_map_show},
>> +	{"sched_tags", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_show},
>> +	{"sched_tags_bitmap", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_bitmap_show},
>> +	{"io_poll", 0600, hctx_io_poll_show, hctx_io_poll_write},
>> +	{"dispatched", 0600, hctx_dispatched_show, hctx_dispatched_write},
>> +	{"queued", 0600, hctx_queued_show, hctx_queued_write},
>> +	{"run", 0600, hctx_run_show, hctx_run_write},
>> +	{"active", 0400, hctx_active_show},
>> +	{"dispatch_busy", 0400, hctx_dispatch_busy_show},
>> +	{}
>> +};
> 
> You may use macro or whatever to avoid so the duplication.

Let me check alternatives.

> 
>> +
>>   static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_ctx_attrs[] = {
>>   	{"default_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_default_rq_list_seq_ops},
>>   	{"read_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_read_rq_list_seq_ops},
>> @@ -878,13 +895,17 @@ void blk_mq_debugfs_register_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>>   				  struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>>   {
>>   	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
>> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>>   	char name[20];
>>   	int i;
>>   
>>   	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "hctx%u", hctx->queue_num);
>>   	hctx->debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, q->debugfs_dir);
>>   
>> -	debugfs_create_files(hctx->debugfs_dir, hctx, blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_attrs);
>> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set))
>> +		debugfs_create_files(hctx->debugfs_dir, hctx, blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_shared_sbitmap_attrs);
>> +	else
>> +		debugfs_create_files(hctx->debugfs_dir, hctx, blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_attrs);
>>   
>>   	hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i)
>>   		blk_mq_debugfs_register_ctx(hctx, ctx);
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> index 92843e3e1a2a..7db16e49f6f6 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>> @@ -60,9 +60,11 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>>    * For shared tag users, we track the number of currently active users
>>    * and attempt to provide a fair share of the tag depth for each of them.
>>    */
>> -static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> +static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>>   				  struct sbitmap_queue *bt)
>>   {
>> +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data->hctx;
>> +	struct request_queue *q = data->q;
>>   	unsigned int depth, users;
>>   
>>   	if (!hctx || !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED))
>> @@ -84,15 +86,15 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>   	 * Allow at least some tags
>>   	 */
>>   	depth = max((bt->sb.depth + users - 1) / users, 4U);
>> -	return atomic_read(&hctx->nr_active) < depth;
>> +	return __blk_mq_active_requests(hctx, q) < depth;
> 
> There is big change on 'users' too:
> 
> 	users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> 
> Originally there is single hctx->tags for these HBAs, now there are many
> hctx->tags, so 'users' may become much smaller than before.

Can you please check how I handled that in the next patch? There we 
record the number of active request queues per set.

(I will note that I could have combined some of these patches, but I 
liked the piecemeal appraoch, and none of these paths are enabled until 
later).

> 
> Maybe '->active_queues' can be moved to tag_set for blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared().
> 
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int __blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>>   			    struct sbitmap_queue *bt)
>>   {
>>   	if (!(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_INTERNAL) &&
>> -	    !hctx_may_queue(data->hctx, bt))
>> -		return BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
>> +	    !hctx_may_queue(data, bt))
>> +		return -1;
> 
> BLK_MQ_NO_TAG should have been returned.

OK, I missed that in the rebase.

> 
>>   	if (data->shallow_depth)
>>   		return __sbitmap_queue_get_shallow(bt, data->shallow_depth);
>>   	else
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 77120dd4e4d5..0f7e062a1665 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>>   	} else {
>>   		if (data->hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED) {
>>   			rq_flags = RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
>> -			atomic_inc(&data->hctx->nr_active);
>> +			__blk_mq_inc_active_requests(data->hctx, data->q);
>>   		}
>>   		rq->tag = tag;
>>   		rq->internal_tag = BLK_MQ_NO_TAG;
>> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
>>   
>>   	ctx->rq_completed[rq_is_sync(rq)]++;
>>   	if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT)
>> -		atomic_dec(&hctx->nr_active);
>> +		__blk_mq_dec_active_requests(hctx, q);
>>   
>>   	if (unlikely(laptop_mode && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)))
>>   		laptop_io_completion(q->backing_dev_info);
>> @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
>>   	if (rq->tag >= 0) {
>>   		if (shared) {
>>   			rq->rq_flags |= RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
>> -			atomic_inc(&data.hctx->nr_active);
>> +			__blk_mq_inc_active_requests(rq->mq_hctx, rq->q);
>>   		}
>>   		data.hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] = rq;
>>   	}
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
>> index 1a283c707215..9c1e612c2298 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
>> @@ -202,6 +202,32 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>>   	return true;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline void __blk_mq_inc_active_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> +						struct request_queue *q)
>> +{
>> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set))
>> +		atomic_inc(&q->nr_active_requests_shared_sbitmap);
>> +	else
>> +		atomic_inc(&hctx->nr_active);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void __blk_mq_dec_active_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> +						struct request_queue *q)
>> +{
>> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set))
>> +		atomic_dec(&q->nr_active_requests_shared_sbitmap);
>> +	else
>> +		atomic_dec(&hctx->nr_active);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int __blk_mq_active_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> +					   struct request_queue *q)
>> +{
>> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set))
> 
> I'd suggest to add one hctx version of blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared() since
> q->tag_set is seldom used in fast path, and hctx->flags is more
> efficient than tag_set->flags.

OK

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-11 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:29 [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/12] blk-mq: rename BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED as BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/12] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth() John Garry
2020-06-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11  8:26     ` John Garry
2020-06-23 11:25       ` John Garry
2020-06-23 14:23         ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-24  8:13           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-29 16:18             ` John Garry
2020-08-10 16:51           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:01             ` John Garry
2020-08-11 16:34               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/12] blk-mq: Use pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/12] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset John Garry
2020-06-11  3:37   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:09     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-06-11  4:04   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:22     ` John Garry [this message]
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:33     ` John Garry
2020-06-12  6:06       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-29 15:32         ` About sbitmap_bitmap_show() and cleared bits (was Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap) John Garry
2020-06-30  6:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-30  7:30             ` John Garry
2020-06-30 11:36               ` John Garry
2020-06-30 14:55           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  9:41         ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-07-13 12:20           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/12] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/12] scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters " John Garry
2020-07-02 10:23   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-06  8:23     ` John Garry
2020-07-06  8:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06  9:26         ` John Garry
2020-07-06  9:40           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06 19:19       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07  7:58         ` John Garry
2020-07-07 14:45           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07 16:17             ` John Garry
2020-07-09 19:01               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-10  8:10                 ` John Garry
2020-07-13  7:55                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-13  8:42                     ` John Garry
2020-07-19 19:07                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  7:23                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  9:18                         ` John Garry
2020-07-21  1:13                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-21  6:53                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  4:12                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  5:30                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  8:04                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  9:32                                   ` John Garry
2020-07-23 14:07                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-23 17:29                                       ` John Garry
2020-07-24  2:47                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  7:54                                           ` John Garry
2020-07-28  8:45                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29  5:25                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-29 15:36                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29 18:31                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-04  8:36                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-04  9:27                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-05  8:40                                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 10:25                                                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 13:38                                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 14:37                                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 15:29                                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-08 19:05                                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-09  2:16                                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-10 16:38                                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:09                                                                         ` John Garry
2020-08-04 17:00                                               ` John Garry
2020-08-05  2:56                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  8:01                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-08 11:31         ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/12] smartpqi: enable host tagset John Garry
2020-07-14 13:16   ` John Garry
2020-07-14 13:31     ` John Garry
2020-07-14 18:16       ` Don.Brace
2020-07-15  7:28         ` John Garry
2020-07-14 14:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-18  8:33       ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ John Garry
2020-07-14  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-07-14  7:41     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14  7:52       ` John Garry
2020-07-14  8:06         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14  9:53           ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:14             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:43               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:19             ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:35               ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:44               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:52                 ` John Garry
2020-07-14 12:04                   ` Ming Lei
2020-08-03 20:39         ` Don.Brace
2020-08-04  9:27           ` John Garry
2020-08-04 15:18             ` Don.Brace
2020-08-05 11:21               ` John Garry
2020-08-14 21:04                 ` Don.Brace
2020-08-17  8:00                   ` John Garry
2020-08-17 18:39                     ` Don.Brace
2020-08-18  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-16 16:14     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-16 19:45     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-17 10:11       ` John Garry
2020-06-11  3:07 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs Ming Lei
2020-06-11  9:35   ` John Garry
2020-06-12 18:47     ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-15  2:13       ` Ming Lei
2020-06-15  6:57         ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-16  1:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-06-17 11:26             ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-22  6:24               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-23  0:55                 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-23 11:50                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-23 12:11                   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a5dcb3a-8f5c-ab10-7631-4bd1b58b49bb@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).