From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment()
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:29:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMqXVe7DdukZNSEF@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604195900.2096121-3-satyat@google.com>
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:58:52PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> The size of any bio must be aligned to the data unit size of the bio crypt
> context (if it exists) of that bio. This must also be ensured whenever a
> bio is split. Introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment() that returns the
> required alignment in sectors. The number of sectors passed to any call of
> bio_split() must be aligned to blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment().
>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> ---
> block/blk-crypto-internal.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-crypto-internal.h b/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> index 0d36aae538d7..7f1535cc7e7c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> +++ b/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,21 @@ static inline bool blk_crypto_rq_is_encrypted(struct request *rq)
> return rq->crypt_ctx;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns the alignment requirement for the number of sectors in this bio based
> + * on its bi_crypt_context. Any bios split from this bio must follow this
> + * alignment requirement as well. Note that a bio must contain a whole number of
> + * crypto data units (which is selected by the submitter of bio), since
> + * encryption/decryption can only be performed on a complete crypto data unit.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + if (!bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio))
> + return 1;
> + return bio->bi_crypt_context->bc_key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size >>
> + SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */
>
> static inline bool bio_crypt_rq_ctx_compatible(struct request *rq,
> @@ -93,6 +108,11 @@ static inline bool blk_crypto_rq_is_encrypted(struct request *rq)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */
Looks fine, but I think we should rework the comment to be a bit easier to
understand. Maybe:
/*
* Return the number of sectors to which the size of this bio (and any bios
* split from it) must be aligned based on its encryption context.
*/
static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
{
if (!bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio))
return 1;
/*
* If the bio has an encryption context, its size must be aligned to its
* crypto data unit size (which the submitter of the bio selected), as
* encryption/decryption can only be done on complete crypto data units.
*/
return bio->bi_crypt_context->bc_key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size >>
SECTOR_SHIFT;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-04 19:58 [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: introduce blk_ksm_is_empty() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-16 23:47 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 0:29 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: introduce bio_required_sector_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 0:37 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 0:39 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17 4:34 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: keyslot-manager: introduce blk_ksm_restrict_dus_to_queue_limits() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 1:58 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ufshcd: handle error from blk_ksm_register() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mmc: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 3:25 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-24 10:04 ` Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] dm: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 3:23 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] blk-merge: Ensure bios aren't split in middle of a crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] block: add WARN_ON_ONCE() to bio_split() for sector alignment Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17 2:46 ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17 3:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMqXVe7DdukZNSEF@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).