linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment()
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:29:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMqXVe7DdukZNSEF@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604195900.2096121-3-satyat@google.com>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:58:52PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> The size of any bio must be aligned to the data unit size of the bio crypt
> context (if it exists) of that bio. This must also be ensured whenever a
> bio is split. Introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment() that returns the
> required alignment in sectors. The number of sectors passed to any call of
> bio_split() must be aligned to blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-crypto-internal.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-crypto-internal.h b/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> index 0d36aae538d7..7f1535cc7e7c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> +++ b/block/blk-crypto-internal.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,21 @@ static inline bool blk_crypto_rq_is_encrypted(struct request *rq)
>  	return rq->crypt_ctx;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Returns the alignment requirement for the number of sectors in this bio based
> + * on its bi_crypt_context. Any bios split from this bio must follow this
> + * alignment requirement as well. Note that a bio must contain a whole number of
> + * crypto data units (which is selected by the submitter of bio), since
> + * encryption/decryption can only be performed on a complete crypto data unit.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	if (!bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio))
> +		return 1;
> +	return bio->bi_crypt_context->bc_key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size >>
> +								SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */
>  
>  static inline bool bio_crypt_rq_ctx_compatible(struct request *rq,
> @@ -93,6 +108,11 @@ static inline bool blk_crypto_rq_is_encrypted(struct request *rq)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION */

Looks fine, but I think we should rework the comment to be a bit easier to
understand.  Maybe:

/*
 * Return the number of sectors to which the size of this bio (and any bios
 * split from it) must be aligned based on its encryption context.
 */
static inline unsigned int blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment(struct bio *bio)
{
	if (!bio_has_crypt_ctx(bio))
		return 1;
	/*
	 * If the bio has an encryption context, its size must be aligned to its
	 * crypto data unit size (which the submitter of the bio selected), as
	 * encryption/decryption can only be done on complete crypto data units.
	 */
	return bio->bi_crypt_context->bc_key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size >>
								SECTOR_SHIFT;
}

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04 19:58 [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: introduce blk_ksm_is_empty() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-16 23:47   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:29   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: introduce bio_required_sector_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:37   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:39   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17  4:34     ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: keyslot-manager: introduce blk_ksm_restrict_dus_to_queue_limits() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  1:58   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ufshcd: handle error from blk_ksm_register() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mmc: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  3:25   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-24 10:04     ` Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] dm: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  3:23   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] blk-merge: Ensure bios aren't split in middle of a crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] block: add WARN_ON_ONCE() to bio_split() for sector alignment Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  2:46   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17  3:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMqXVe7DdukZNSEF@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyat@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).