linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:34:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMrQ7KjD8BpbqNyK@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMqZuBssXiMvDxIf@sol.localdomain>

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 05:39:20PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:58:54PM +0000, Satya Tangirala wrote:
> > Make blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed() respect
> > bio_required_sector_alignment() when calling bio_split(). Without this,
> > blk-crypto-fallback could possibly split a bio in the middle of a data
> > unit, and the resulting bios can no longer be encrypted (since encryption
> > can only be done on complete crypto data units).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-crypto-fallback.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> > index c322176a1e09..85c813ef670b 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-crypto-fallback.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/random.h>
> >  
> > +#include "blk.h"
> >  #include "blk-crypto-internal.h"
> >  
> >  static unsigned int num_prealloc_bounce_pg = 32;
> > @@ -225,6 +226,8 @@ static bool blk_crypto_split_bio_if_needed(struct bio **bio_ptr)
> >  	if (num_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
> >  		struct bio *split_bio;
> >  
> > +		num_sectors = round_down(num_sectors,
> > +					 bio_required_sector_alignment(bio));
> >  		split_bio = bio_split(bio, num_sectors, GFP_NOIO,
> >  				      &crypto_bio_split);
> >  		if (!split_bio) {
> > -- 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Hmm, on second thought, I don't think this patch makes sense without the patch
"block: blk-crypto-fallback: handle data unit split across multiple bvecs"
which Satya sent out in his other series
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210604210908.2105870-2-satyat@google.com).
Either blk-crypto-fallback assumes that the length of every bio_vec is aligned
to data_unit_size (this is the status quo), in which case the round_down() is
unnecessary, *or* it assumes that only the total length is aligned to
data_unit_size, in which case both patches are needed.  So I'm thinking these
should be combined into one patch.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04 19:58 [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: introduce blk_ksm_is_empty() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-16 23:47   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: blk-crypto: introduce blk_crypto_bio_sectors_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:29   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: introduce bio_required_sector_alignment() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:37   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  0:39   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17  4:34     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: keyslot-manager: introduce blk_ksm_restrict_dus_to_queue_limits() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  1:58   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ufshcd: handle error from blk_ksm_register() Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mmc: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  3:25   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-24 10:04     ` Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] dm: " Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  3:23   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-04 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] blk-merge: Ensure bios aren't split in middle of a crypto data unit Satya Tangirala
2021-06-04 19:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] block: add WARN_ON_ONCE() to bio_split() for sector alignment Satya Tangirala
2021-06-17  2:46   ` Eric Biggers
2021-06-17  3:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] ensure bios aren't split in middle of crypto data unit Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMrQ7KjD8BpbqNyK@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyat@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] block: respect bio_required_sector_alignment() in blk-crypto-fallback' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).