From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:41:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1tujd9bwg.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB7081E6B85744B1F86AC5E7CBE7C79@DM6PR04MB7081.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (Damien Le Moal's message of "Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:07:09 +0000")
Damien,
> Re-ping ? Anything against this series ? Can we get it queued for 5.15 ?
Wrt. the choice of 'crange':
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAHk-=wiZ=wwa4oAA0y=Kztafgp0n+BDTEV6ybLoH2nvLBeJBLA@mail.gmail.com/
I share Linus' sentiment.
I really think 'crange' is a horribly non-descriptive name compared to
logical_block_size, max_sectors_kb, discard_max_bytes, and the other
things we export.
In addition, the recently posted copy offload patches also used
'crange', in that context to describe a 'copy range'.
Anyway. Just my opinion.
Jens: Feel free to add my Acked-by: to the sd pieces. My SCSI discovery
rework won't make 5.15.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 7:50 [PATCH v5 0/5] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] block: Add concurrent positioning ranges support Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] scsi: sd: add " Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] libata: support concurrent positioning ranges log Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] doc: document sysfs queue/cranges attributes Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] doc: Fix typo in request queue sysfs documentation Damien Le Moal
2021-08-12 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Initial support for multi-actuator HDDs Jens Axboe
2021-08-12 17:21 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-12 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-13 0:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-16 17:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-17 4:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-16 17:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-17 4:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-18 2:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-18 2:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-23 1:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-26 2:07 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-26 2:41 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2021-08-26 3:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-26 3:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-26 3:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-26 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-08-27 3:03 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-08-27 3:11 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1tujd9bwg.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).