linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: tests: add separate stub for find_lock_delalloc_range
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:22:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42d07540b52556af89366c9fee628829148bffac.1536599879.git.dsterba@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1536599879.git.dsterba@suse.com>

The helper find_lock_delalloc_range is now conditionally built static,
dpending on whether the self-tests are enabled or not. There's a macro
that is suppsed to hide the export, used only once. To discourage
further use, drop it an add a public stub for the helper required by
tests.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h                 |  6 ------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c             | 13 ++++++++++++-
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h             |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 10 +++++-----
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 2cddfe7806a4..45b7029d0f23 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -41,12 +41,6 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *btrfs_path_cachep;
 extern struct kmem_cache *btrfs_free_space_cachep;
 struct btrfs_ordered_sum;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
-#define STATIC noinline
-#else
-#define STATIC static noinline
-#endif
-
 #define BTRFS_MAGIC 0x4D5F53665248425FULL /* ascii _BHRfS_M, no null */
 
 #define BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS 3
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 4dd6faab02bb..06e280d8750c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ static noinline int lock_delalloc_pages(struct inode *inode,
  *
  * 1 is returned if we find something, 0 if nothing was in the tree
  */
-STATIC u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
+static u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
 				    struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 				    struct page *locked_page, u64 *start,
 				    u64 *end, u64 max_bytes)
@@ -1648,6 +1648,17 @@ STATIC u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
 	return found;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
+u64 btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
+				    struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+				    struct page *locked_page, u64 *start,
+				    u64 *end, u64 max_bytes)
+{
+	return find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, tree, locked_page, start, end,
+			max_bytes);
+}
+#endif
+
 static int __process_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping,
 				  struct page *locked_page,
 				  pgoff_t start_index, pgoff_t end_index,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index b4d03e677e1d..1a7fdcbca49b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ int free_io_failure(struct extent_io_tree *failure_tree,
 		    struct extent_io_tree *io_tree,
 		    struct io_failure_record *rec);
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
-noinline u64 find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
+u64 btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(struct inode *inode,
 				      struct extent_io_tree *tree,
 				      struct page *locked_page, u64 *start,
 				      u64 *end, u64 max_bytes);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
index d9269a531a4d..9e0f4a01be14 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
 	set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, 0, sectorsize - 1, 0, NULL);
 	start = 0;
 	end = 0;
-	found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
+	found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
 					 &end, max_bytes);
 	if (!found) {
 		test_err("should have found at least one delalloc");
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
 	set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, sectorsize, max_bytes - 1, 0, NULL);
 	start = test_start;
 	end = 0;
-	found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
+	found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
 					 &end, max_bytes);
 	if (!found) {
 		test_err("couldn't find delalloc in our range");
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
 	}
 	start = test_start;
 	end = 0;
-	found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
+	found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
 					 &end, max_bytes);
 	if (found) {
 		test_err("found range when we shouldn't have");
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
 	set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, max_bytes, total_dirty - 1, 0, NULL);
 	start = test_start;
 	end = 0;
-	found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
+	found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
 					 &end, max_bytes);
 	if (!found) {
 		test_err("didn't find our range");
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
 	 * this changes at any point in the future we will need to fix this
 	 * tests expected behavior.
 	 */
-	found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
+	found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start,
 					 &end, max_bytes);
 	if (!found) {
 		test_err("didn't find our range");
-- 
2.18.0

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-10 17:22 [PATCH 0/4] Self-test cleanups David Sterba
2018-09-10 17:22 ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-09-10 23:40   ` [PATCH 1/4] btrfs: tests: add separate stub for find_lock_delalloc_range Omar Sandoval
2018-09-11  8:50     ` David Sterba
2018-09-14 16:38     ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] " David Sterba
2018-09-17 17:43       ` Omar Sandoval
2018-09-10 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: tests: move testing members of struct btrfs_root to the end David Sterba
2018-09-10 23:37   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-09-10 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] btrfs: tests: group declarations of self-test helpers David Sterba
2018-09-10 23:41   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-09-10 17:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] btrfs: tests: polish ifdefs around testing helper David Sterba
2018-09-10 23:43   ` Omar Sandoval
2018-09-11  9:22     ` David Sterba
2018-09-11 19:14       ` Omar Sandoval
2018-09-14 14:20         ` David Sterba
2018-09-14 16:42         ` [PATCH 4/4 v2] " David Sterba
2018-09-17 17:40           ` Omar Sandoval

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42d07540b52556af89366c9fee628829148bffac.1536599879.git.dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).