linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Sven Schuchmann <schuchmann@schleissheimer.de>,
	"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] can: isotp: omit unintended hrtimer restart on socket release
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:44:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f9a3a93-fa0e-f039-6332-5ac0d4064731@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB8P190MB0634D4408A4A57A74134E698D9CB9@DB8P190MB0634.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hi Sven,

On 30.08.21 09:55, Sven Schuchmann wrote:

>> but if I compare the candumps I can see:
>> with the patch:
>>
>>   (000.000008)  vcan0  714   [8]  2F 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
>>   (000.000209)  vcan0  77E   [8]  30 0F 00 AA AA AA AA AA
>>   (000.000061)  vcan0  714   [8]  20 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
>>
>> and without:
>>
>>   (000.000004)  vcan0  714   [8]  2F 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
>>   (000.000069)  vcan0  77E   [8]  30 0F 00 AA AA AA AA AA
>>   (000.000017)  vcan0  714   [8]  20 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
>>
>> sorry, I missed that: Over here the delay seems to be in
>> the FC and not in the CF after the FC. This is what is
>> different compared to the real hardware.
>>
>> So to me it seems that the rcu implementation
>> has changed on the way from 5.10 to 5.14?
> 
> Just checked with a 5.14.0-rc6 which contains the patch, same result:
> 
>     93 / curr:  143 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  156.2
>     94 / curr:  144 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  156.0
>     95 / curr:  141 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  155.9
>     96 / curr:  171 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  156.0
>     97 / curr:  138 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  155.8
>     98 / curr:  137 / min:  129 / max:  200 / avg:  155.6
> 
>   (000.000011)  vcan0  714   [8]  2B 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
>   (000.000193)  vcan0  77E   [8]  30 0F 00 AA AA AA AA AA
>   (000.000037)  vcan0  714   [8]  2C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
> 
> So maybe there is something wrong on the rpi?

I see a similar difference on my i7-8650U system:

"5" without and "65" with the patch.

The problem remains to be the added time that is now introduced at 
socket close time with the rcu_synchronize().

In your script you are waiting for isotprecv process to finally end with:

	wait $rxpid

And that's the expectable effect ...

It looks like the script works fine without the 'wait' code (which does 
not wait for the process removal then).

@mkl: I assume we have to live with that increased time at socket close 
for security reasons, right?

Best regards,
Oliver

ps. Btw IMO a C program is still the better approach here. 
isotp[send|recv] open/close the sockets for each PDU in the given setup :-/

      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-30 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18 17:37 [PATCH] can: isotp: omit unintended hrtimer restart on socket release Oliver Hartkopp
2021-06-19 21:36 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-08-28 13:20 ` AW: " Sven Schuchmann
2021-08-29 11:17   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2021-08-29 18:28     ` AW: " Sven Schuchmann
2021-08-29 20:14       ` Oliver Hartkopp
2021-08-29 20:28         ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-08-29 21:09         ` AW: AW: AW: " Sven Schuchmann
2021-08-30  7:55           ` Sven Schuchmann
2021-08-30 12:44             ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f9a3a93-fa0e-f039-6332-5ac0d4064731@hartkopp.net \
    --to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=schuchmann@schleissheimer.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).