* [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid
@ 2021-02-02 6:23 Joakim Zhang
2021-02-02 7:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Zhang @ 2021-02-02 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mkl, linux-can; +Cc: netdev, linux-imx
RX FIFO enable failed could happen when do system reboot stress test,
one customer reports failure rate is about 50%.
[ 0.303958] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: 5a8d0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
[ 0.304281] flexcan 5a8d0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
[ 0.314640] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: registering netdev failed
[ 0.320728] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: 5a8e0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
[ 0.320991] flexcan 5a8e0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
[ 0.331360] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: registering netdev failed
[ 0.337444] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: 5a8f0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
[ 0.337716] flexcan 5a8f0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
[ 0.348117] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: registering netdev failed
RX FIFO should be enabled after the FRZ/HALT are valid. But the current
code set RX FIFO enable and FRZ/HALT at the same time.
Fixes: e955cead03117 ("CAN: Add Flexcan CAN controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
---
drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index 038fe1036df2..8ee9fa2f4161 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -1803,6 +1803,7 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
+ unsigned int timeout = FLEXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
u32 reg, err;
err = flexcan_clks_enable(priv);
@@ -1825,10 +1826,19 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device *dev)
if (err)
goto out_chip_disable;
- /* set freeze, halt and activate FIFO, restrict register access */
+ /* set freeze, halt and polling the freeze ack */
reg = priv->read(®s->mcr);
- reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
- FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV;
+ reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT;
+ priv->write(reg, ®s->mcr);
+
+ while (timeout-- && !(priv->read(®s->mcr) & FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ_ACK))
+ udelay(100);
+
+ if (!(priv->read(®s->mcr) & FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ_ACK))
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+ /* Activate FIFO, restrict register access */
+ reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV;
priv->write(reg, ®s->mcr);
/* Currently we only support newer versions of this core
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid
2021-02-02 6:23 [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid Joakim Zhang
@ 2021-02-02 7:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Joakim Zhang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2021-02-02 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Zhang, linux-can; +Cc: netdev, linux-imx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2822 bytes --]
On 2/2/21 7:23 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> RX FIFO enable failed could happen when do system reboot stress test,
> one customer reports failure rate is about 50%.
>
> [ 0.303958] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: 5a8d0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.304281] flexcan 5a8d0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> [ 0.314640] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: registering netdev failed
> [ 0.320728] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: 5a8e0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.320991] flexcan 5a8e0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> [ 0.331360] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: registering netdev failed
> [ 0.337444] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: 5a8f0000.can supply xceiver not found, using dummy regulator
> [ 0.337716] flexcan 5a8f0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized): Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> [ 0.348117] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: registering netdev failed
>
> RX FIFO should be enabled after the FRZ/HALT are valid. But the current
> code set RX FIFO enable and FRZ/HALT at the same time.
>
> Fixes: e955cead03117 ("CAN: Add Flexcan CAN controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> index 038fe1036df2..8ee9fa2f4161 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> @@ -1803,6 +1803,7 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
> + unsigned int timeout = FLEXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
> u32 reg, err;
>
> err = flexcan_clks_enable(priv);
> @@ -1825,10 +1826,19 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device *dev)
> if (err)
> goto out_chip_disable;
>
> - /* set freeze, halt and activate FIFO, restrict register access */
> + /* set freeze, halt and polling the freeze ack */
> reg = priv->read(®s->mcr);
> - reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
> - FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV;
> + reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT;
> + priv->write(reg, ®s->mcr);
> +
> + while (timeout-- && !(priv->read(®s->mcr) & FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ_ACK))
> + udelay(100);
Please make use of existing functions like flexcan_chip_freeze().
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid
2021-02-02 7:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
@ 2021-02-02 8:02 ` Joakim Zhang
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joakim Zhang @ 2021-02-02 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can; +Cc: netdev, dl-linux-imx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> Sent: 2021年2月2日 15:37
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>; linux-can@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT
> valid
>
> On 2/2/21 7:23 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > RX FIFO enable failed could happen when do system reboot stress test,
> > one customer reports failure rate is about 50%.
> >
> > [ 0.303958] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: 5a8d0000.can supply xceiver not
> found, using dummy regulator
> > [ 0.304281] flexcan 5a8d0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized):
> Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> > [ 0.314640] flexcan 5a8d0000.can: registering netdev failed
> > [ 0.320728] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: 5a8e0000.can supply xceiver not
> found, using dummy regulator
> > [ 0.320991] flexcan 5a8e0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized):
> Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> > [ 0.331360] flexcan 5a8e0000.can: registering netdev failed
> > [ 0.337444] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: 5a8f0000.can supply xceiver not found,
> using dummy regulator
> > [ 0.337716] flexcan 5a8f0000.can (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized):
> Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core
> > [ 0.348117] flexcan 5a8f0000.can: registering netdev failed
> >
> > RX FIFO should be enabled after the FRZ/HALT are valid. But the
> > current code set RX FIFO enable and FRZ/HALT at the same time.
> >
> > Fixes: e955cead03117 ("CAN: Add Flexcan CAN controller driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > index 038fe1036df2..8ee9fa2f4161 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > @@ -1803,6 +1803,7 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device
> > *dev) {
> > struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
> > + unsigned int timeout = FLEXCAN_TIMEOUT_US / 10;
> > u32 reg, err;
> >
> > err = flexcan_clks_enable(priv);
> > @@ -1825,10 +1826,19 @@ static int register_flexcandev(struct net_device
> *dev)
> > if (err)
> > goto out_chip_disable;
> >
> > - /* set freeze, halt and activate FIFO, restrict register access */
> > + /* set freeze, halt and polling the freeze ack */
> > reg = priv->read(®s->mcr);
> > - reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
> > - FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV;
> > + reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT;
> > + priv->write(reg, ®s->mcr);
> > +
> > + while (timeout-- && !(priv->read(®s->mcr) &
> FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ_ACK))
> > + udelay(100);
>
> Please make use of existing functions like flexcan_chip_freeze().
OK, will improve it. Marc, I notice this issue also exist in flexcan_chip_start(), should I fix it together?
Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> regards,
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Joakim Zhang
@ 2021-02-02 8:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2021-02-02 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joakim Zhang, linux-can; +Cc: netdev, dl-linux-imx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 543 bytes --]
On 2/2/21 9:02 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>> Please make use of existing functions like flexcan_chip_freeze().
>
> OK, will improve it. Marc, I notice this issue also exist in
> flexcan_chip_start(), should I fix it together?
Make it two seperate patches.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-02 8:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-02 6:23 [PATCH linux-can] can: flexcan: enable RX FIFO after FRZ/HALT valid Joakim Zhang
2021-02-02 7:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Joakim Zhang
2021-02-02 8:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).