* ksmbd mailing list @ 2021-06-22 6:12 ` 'Christoph Hellwig' 2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: 'Christoph Hellwig' @ 2021-06-22 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon; +Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs Is there a good reason to have a ksmbd-specific list instead of pooling all the smb3 knowledge on a single list, similar to how nfs development works? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-22 6:12 ` ksmbd mailing list 'Christoph Hellwig' @ 2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon 2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-22 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Christoph Hellwig' Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French', 'ronnie sahlberg', aurelien.aptel > Is there a good reason to have a ksmbd-specific list instead of pooling all the smb3 knowledge on a > single list, similar to how nfs development works? There are users who subscribe only to ksmbd-specific list since ksmbd is out of tree. So we specified both lists in MAINTAINERS. I do not object to use single list and kill the specific list after ksmbd is merged into mainline. Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. Any opinions? Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel 2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Aurélien Aptel @ 2021-06-22 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon, 'Christoph Hellwig' Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French', 'ronnie sahlberg', aurelien.aptel "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes: > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. > Any opinions? I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce. Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and scripts. Cheers, -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel @ 2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon 2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Aurélien Aptel', 'Christoph Hellwig' Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French', 'ronnie sahlberg' > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes: > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. > > Any opinions? > > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag > somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce. > > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and > scripts. Thanks for your opinion! I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS. > Cheers, > -- > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French 2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon 2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Steve French @ 2021-06-23 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namjae Jeon Cc: Aurélien Aptel, Christoph Hellwig, COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER, CIFS, ronnie sahlberg We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools) On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:41 PM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> wrote: > > > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes: > > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. > > > Any opinions? > > > > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag > > somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce. > > > > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for > > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and > > scripts. > Thanks for your opinion! > I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS. > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, > > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München) > > -- Thanks, Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French @ 2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon 2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Steve French' Cc: 'Aurélien Aptel', 'Christoph Hellwig', 'COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER', 'CIFS', 'ronnie sahlberg' > We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki pages on samba.org and also in > the kernel documentation directory for each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix > that indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] if you prefer, [cifs] for > the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools) Okay, I will update it in wiki and kernel documentation. Thanks! > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:41 PM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> wrote: > > > > > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes: > > > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. > > > > Any opinions? > > > > > > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should > > > ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce. > > > > > > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches > > > for > > > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the > > > subject which can confuse people and scripts. > > Thanks for your opinion! > > I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS. > > > > > Cheers, > > > -- > > > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > > > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE > > > Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE > > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG > > > München) > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French 2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig 2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-06-23 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve French Cc: Namjae Jeon, Aur??lien Aptel, Christoph Hellwig, COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER, CIFS, ronnie sahlberg On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:52:33PM -0500, Steve French wrote: > We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki > pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for > each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that > indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] > if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools) The normal kernel patch prefixes would be: cifs: and ksmbd: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list 2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Christoph Hellwig', 'Steve French' Cc: 'Aur??lien Aptel', 'COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER', 'CIFS', 'ronnie sahlberg' > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:52:33PM -0500, Steve French wrote: > > We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki > > pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for > > each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that > > indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] > > if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools) > > The normal kernel patch prefixes would be: > > cifs: > > and > > ksmbd: Yes, Sure:) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-23 5:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20210622061228epcas1p247d557ef24a971eaf395edd6174bed5e@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-06-22 6:12 ` ksmbd mailing list 'Christoph Hellwig'
2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel
2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).