linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
	Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v7 22/28] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent()
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:00:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220715160014.2623107-23-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715160014.2623107-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

We will need to know if a clk_core pointer has a given parent in other
functions, so let's create a clk_core_has_parent() function that
clk_has_parent() will call into.

For good measure, let's add some unit tests as well to make sure it
works properly.

Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c      | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index ad851afcfdd2..7fc6347e66c6 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -539,6 +539,26 @@ static bool mux_is_better_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long now,
 static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
 				      struct clk_rate_request *req);
 
+static bool clk_core_has_parent(struct clk_core *core, const struct clk_core *parent)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	/* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
+	if (core == parent)
+		return true;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++) {
+		struct clk_core *tmp = clk_core_get_parent_by_index(core, i);
+		if (!tmp)
+			continue;
+
+		if (tmp == parent)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
 				 struct clk_rate_request *req,
 				 unsigned long flags)
@@ -2570,25 +2590,11 @@ void clk_hw_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *new_parent)
  */
 bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
 {
-	struct clk_core *core, *parent_core;
-	int i;
-
 	/* NULL clocks should be nops, so return success if either is NULL. */
 	if (!clk || !parent)
 		return true;
 
-	core = clk->core;
-	parent_core = parent->core;
-
-	/* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
-	if (core->parent == parent_core)
-		return true;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++)
-		if (!strcmp(core->parents[i].name, parent_core->name))
-			return true;
-
-	return false;
+	return clk_core_has_parent(clk->core, parent->core);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
 
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index d1b1372f7aaa..7068517428e2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -491,8 +491,32 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
 	clk_put(clk);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, clk_has_parent()
+ * actually reports all of them as parents.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
+	struct clk *parent;
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent));
+	clk_put(parent);
+
+	parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent));
+	clk_put(parent);
+
+	clk_put(clk);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent),
 	{}
 };
 
@@ -918,6 +942,24 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
 	clk_put(clk);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_has_parent() actually
+ * reports it as a parent.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, NULL);
+	struct clk *parent = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw, NULL);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent));
+
+	clk_put(parent);
+	clk_put(clk);
+}
+
 /*
  * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
  * parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child,
@@ -1022,6 +1064,7 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test
 
 static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last),
 	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller),
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-15 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15 15:59 [PATCH v7 00/28] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/28] clk: bcm: rpi: Create helper to retrieve private data Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/28] clk: bcm: rpi: Add a function to retrieve the maximum Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/28] drm/vc4: hdmi: Rework hdmi_enable_4kp60 detection Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/28] clk: test: Switch to clk_hw_get_clk Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/28] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/28] clk: Skip clamping when rounding if there's no boundaries Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/28] clk: Mention that .recalc_rate can return 0 on error Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/28] clk: Clarify clk_get_rate() expectations Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/28] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/28] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/28] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 12/28] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 13/28] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 14/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 15/28] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 16/28] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 17/28] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 18/28] clk: Move clk_core_init_rate_req() from clk_core_round_rate_nolock() to its caller Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 19/28] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 20/28] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 21/28] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 23/28] clk: Constify clk_has_parent() Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 24/28] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 25/28] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 26/28] clk: Introduce the clk_hw_get_rate_range function Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 27/28] clk: qcom: clk-rcg2: Take clock boundaries into consideration for gfx3d Maxime Ripard
2022-07-15 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 28/28] clk: tests: Add missing test case for ranges Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220715160014.2623107-23-maxime@cerno.tech \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).