From: chandanu@codeaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: qcom : dispcc: Add support for display port clocks
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:05:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7440ea58b65150ed333bf6bba2d30c3@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154083859263.98144.15690571729193618604@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hello Stephen,
On 2018-10-29 11:43, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-10-28 03:34:55)
>> Hello Stephen,
>>
>> On 2018-10-19 16:04, Taniya Das wrote:
>> > Hello Stephen,
>> >
/snip
>> >>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src = {
>> >>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2154,
>> >>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> >>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> >>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_1,
>> >>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src,
>> >>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> >>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src",
>> >>> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_1,
>> >>> + .num_parents = 4,
>> >>> + .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> >>
>> >> Why?
>> >>
>> >>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> >>> + },
>> >>> +};
>> >>> +
>> >>> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src[] = {
>> >>> + F(162000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> >>> + F(270000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> >>> + F(540000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> >>> + F(810000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> >>
>> >> Are these in kHz? They really look like it and that's bad. Why do we
>> >> need them at all? Just to make sure the display driver picks these
>> >> exact
>> >> frequencies? It seems like we could just pass whatever number comes in
>> >> up to the parent and see what it can do.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Let me check back the reason we had to make this change.
>>
>> We will need this flag since we reset/power-down the PLL every time we
>> disconnect/connect the DP cable or during suspend/resume. Only with
>> this
>> flag, the calls to the PLL driver are properly called.
>
> What does this mean? I wanted to know about the weird frequencies
> listed
> above, and why it can't be done without a frequency table and direct
> rates passed up to the parent.
>
/snip
>> >>
>> >>> +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_intf_clk = {
>> >>> + .halt_reg = 0x2044,
>> >>> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
>> >>> + .clkr = {
>> >>> + .enable_reg = 0x2044,
>> >>> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
>> >>> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> >>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_intf_clk",
>> >>> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
>> >>> + "disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src",
>> >>> + },
>> >>> + .num_parents = 1,
>> >>> + .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> >>
>> >> Why?
>> >>
>> >
>> > It was a requirement, but let me get back on this too.
>> >
>> I had a discussion with the Display Port teams and below is the
>> requirement,
>>
>> This flag is required since we reset/power-down the PLL every time
>> they
>> disconnect/connect the DP cable or during suspend/resume.
>> Only with this flag, the calls to the PLL driver properly.
>
> Ok. So that explains the get rate nocache flag. Can you please add a
> comment that explains that these clk registers here are lost across
> suspend/resume of the display device? It really sounds like these
> display clks are inside of the display power domain and thus they lose
> their state across the display power domain power down. It would be
> better if we could properly implement suspend/restore for these clk
> registers across suspend/resume of the display device so that we don't
> need this nocache flag and the display code can work together with the
> clk code here to restore the frequency to the clk.
We already handle the suspend/restore for these clk registers
in Dp PLL domain. Without the "NOCACHE_FLAG", and if we are requesting
the same clock rate
for any of the clocks, the set_rate call never reaches the DP PLL Ops.
I am not clear on what you are suggesting for removing the
"NOCACHE_FLAG" for
the DisplayPort clocks. Are you suggesting design changes in DP PLL
driver or in dispcc-driver?
Can you please provide more details?
thanks
Chandan
>
> Is it really the case that the rcg here is always selecting a
> particular
> PLL and doing a div-1? Because that is very simple then to just write
> that setting again on genpd restore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-02 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-09 13:57 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add support for display port clocks and clock ops Taniya Das
2018-10-09 13:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: qcom: rcg2: Add support for display port " Taniya Das
2018-10-09 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-19 10:31 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-09 13:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: qcom : dispcc: Add support for display port clocks Taniya Das
2018-10-09 20:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-19 10:34 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-28 10:34 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-29 18:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-30 6:01 ` Taniya Das
2018-10-30 16:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-11-01 5:02 ` Taniya Das
2018-11-06 17:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-11-12 3:41 ` chandanu
2019-02-02 0:05 ` chandanu [this message]
2019-07-15 22:59 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7440ea58b65150ed333bf6bba2d30c3@codeaurora.org \
--to=chandanu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).