devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v9 1/3] pwm: driver for qualcomm ipq6018 pwm block
@ 2021-11-30 17:37 Baruch Siach
  2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding Baruch Siach
  2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: add pwm node Baruch Siach
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2021-11-30 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson
  Cc: Baruch Siach, Balaji Prakash J, Rob Herring, Robert Marko,
	Kathiravan T, linux-pwm, devicetree, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-arm-kernel

Driver for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 line of SoCs. Based on
driver from downstream Codeaurora kernel tree. Removed support for older
(V1) variants because I have no access to that hardware.

Tested on IPQ6010 based hardware.

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
v9:

Address comment from Uwe Kleine-König:

  Use period_ns*rate in dividers calculation for better accuracy

  Round down pre_div and pwm_div

  Add a comment explaining why pwm_div can't underflow

  Add a comment explaining why pre_div > pwm_div end the search loop

  Drop 'CFG_' from register macros

  Rename to_ipq_pwm_chip() to ipq_pwm_from_chip()

  Change bare 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int'

  Clarify the comment on separate REG1 write for enable/disable

  Round up the period value in .get_state

  Use direct readl/writel so no need to check for regmap errors

v7:

  Change 'offset' to 'reg' for the tcsr offset (Rob)

  Drop clock name; there is only one clock (Bjorn)

  Simplify probe failure code path (Bjorn)

v6:

Address Uwe Kleine-König review comments:

  Drop IPQ_PWM_MAX_DEVICES

  Rely on assigned-clock-rates; drop IPQ_PWM_CLK_SRC_FREQ

  Simplify register offset calculation

  Calculate duty cycle more precisely

  Refuse to set inverted polarity

  Drop redundant IPQ_PWM_REG1_ENABLE bit clear

  Remove x1000 factor in pwm_div calculation, use rate directly, and round up

  Choose initial pre_div such that pwm_div < IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV

  Ensure pre_div <= pwm_div

  Rename close_ to best_

  Explain in comment why effective_div doesn't overflow

  Limit pwm_div to IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV - 1 to allow 100% duty cycle

  Disable clock only after pwmchip_remove()

  const pwm_ops

Other changes:

  Add missing linux/bitfield.h header include (kernel test robot)

  Adjust code for PWM device node under TCSR (Rob Herring)

v5:

Use &tcsr_q6 syscon to access registers (Bjorn Andersson)

Address Uwe Kleine-König review comments:

  Implement .get_state()

  Add IPQ_PWM_ prefix to local macros

  Use GENMASK/BIT/FIELD_PREP for register fields access

  Make type of config_div_and_duty() parameters consistent

  Derive IPQ_PWM_MIN_PERIOD_NS from IPQ_PWM_CLK_SRC_FREQ

  Integrate enable/disable into config_div_and_duty() to save register read,
  and reduce frequency glitch on update

  Use min() instead of min_t()

  Fix comment format

  Use dev_err_probe() to indicate probe step failure

  Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in .remove

  Don't set .owner

v4:

  Use div64_u64() to fix link for 32-bit targets ((kernel test robot
  <lkp@intel.com>, Uwe Kleine-König)

v3:

  s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)

  Fix integer overflow on 32-bit targets (kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>)

v2:

Address Uwe Kleine-König review comments:

  Fix period calculation when out of range

  Don't set period larger than requested

  Remove PWM disable on configuration change

  Implement .apply instead of non-atomic .config/.enable/.disable

  Don't modify PWM on .request/.free

  Check pwm_div underflow

  Fix various code and comment formatting issues

Other changes:

  Use u64 divisor safe division

  Remove now empty .request/.free
---
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig   |  12 ++
 drivers/pwm/Makefile  |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-ipq.c | 274 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-ipq.c

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 21e3b05a5153..e39718137ecd 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -260,6 +260,18 @@ config PWM_INTEL_LGM
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
 	  will be called pwm-intel-lgm.
 
+config PWM_IPQ
+	tristate "IPQ PWM support"
+	depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on HAVE_CLK && HAS_IOMEM
+	help
+	  Generic PWM framework driver for IPQ PWM block which supports
+	  4 pwm channels. Each of the these channels can be configured
+	  independent of each other.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called pwm-ipq.
+
 config PWM_IQS620A
 	tristate "Azoteq IQS620A PWM support"
 	depends on MFD_IQS62X || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 708840b7fba8..7402feae4b36 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX1)		+= pwm-imx1.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX27)		+= pwm-imx27.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMX_TPM)	+= pwm-imx-tpm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_INTEL_LGM)	+= pwm-intel-lgm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IPQ)		+= pwm-ipq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IQS620A)	+= pwm-iqs620a.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_JZ4740)	+= pwm-jz4740.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY)	+= pwm-keembay.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ipq.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ipq.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b6983fabafe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ipq.c
@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2016-2017, 2020 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+
+/* The frequency range supported is 1 Hz to clock rate */
+#define IPQ_PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS	((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC)
+
+/*
+ * The max value specified for each field is based on the number of bits
+ * in the pwm control register for that field
+ */
+#define IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV		0xFFFF
+
+/*
+ * Two 32-bit registers for each PWM: REG0, and REG1.
+ * Base offset for PWM #i is at 8 * #i.
+ */
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG0			0 /*PWM_DIV PWM_HI*/
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG0_PWM_DIV		GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG0_HI_DURATION	GENMASK(31, 16)
+
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG1			4 /*ENABLE UPDATE PWM_PRE_DIV*/
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG1_PRE_DIV		GENMASK(15, 0)
+/*
+ * Enable bit is set to enable output toggling in pwm device.
+ * Update bit is set to reflect the changed divider and high duration
+ * values in register.
+ */
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG1_UPDATE		BIT(30)
+#define IPQ_PWM_REG1_ENABLE		BIT(31)
+
+
+struct ipq_pwm_chip {
+	struct pwm_chip chip;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	void __iomem *mem;
+};
+
+static struct ipq_pwm_chip *ipq_pwm_from_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+	return container_of(chip, struct ipq_pwm_chip, chip);
+}
+
+static unsigned int ipq_pwm_reg_read(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *ipq_chip = ipq_pwm_from_chip(pwm->chip);
+	unsigned int off = 8 * pwm->hwpwm + reg;
+
+	return readl(ipq_chip->mem + off);
+}
+
+static void ipq_pwm_reg_write(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int reg,
+			      unsigned int val)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *ipq_chip = ipq_pwm_from_chip(pwm->chip);
+	unsigned int off = 8 * pwm->hwpwm + reg;
+
+	writel(val, ipq_chip->mem + off);
+}
+
+static void config_div_and_duty(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int pre_div,
+			unsigned int pwm_div, unsigned long rate, u64 duty_ns,
+			bool enable)
+{
+	unsigned long hi_dur;
+	unsigned long val = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * high duration = pwm duty * (pwm div + 1)
+	 * pwm duty = duty_ns / period_ns
+	 */
+	hi_dur = div64_u64(duty_ns * rate, (pre_div + 1) * NSEC_PER_SEC);
+
+	val = FIELD_PREP(IPQ_PWM_REG0_HI_DURATION, hi_dur) |
+		FIELD_PREP(IPQ_PWM_REG0_PWM_DIV, pwm_div);
+	ipq_pwm_reg_write(pwm, IPQ_PWM_REG0, val);
+
+	val = FIELD_PREP(IPQ_PWM_REG1_PRE_DIV, pre_div);
+	ipq_pwm_reg_write(pwm, IPQ_PWM_REG1, val);
+
+	/* PWM enable toggle needs a separate write to REG1 */
+	val |= IPQ_PWM_REG1_UPDATE;
+	if (enable)
+		val |= IPQ_PWM_REG1_ENABLE;
+	ipq_pwm_reg_write(pwm, IPQ_PWM_REG1, val);
+}
+
+static int ipq_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			 const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *ipq_chip = ipq_pwm_from_chip(chip);
+	unsigned int pre_div, pwm_div, best_pre_div, best_pwm_div;
+	unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(ipq_chip->clk);
+	u64 period_ns, duty_ns, period_rate;
+
+	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (state->period < div64_u64(NSEC_PER_SEC, rate))
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	period_ns = min(state->period, IPQ_PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS);
+	duty_ns = min(state->duty_cycle, period_ns);
+
+	/*
+	 * period_ns is 1G or less. As long as rate is less than 16 GHz this
+	 * does not overflow.
+	 */
+	period_rate = period_ns * rate;
+	best_pre_div = IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV;
+	best_pwm_div = IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV;
+	/* Initial pre_div value such that pwm_div < IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV */
+	pre_div = div64_u64(period_rate,
+			(u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * (IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV + 1));
+
+	for (; pre_div <= IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV; pre_div++) {
+		long long diff;
+		u64 min_diff = period_rate;
+
+		pwm_div = div64_u64(period_rate,
+				(u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1));
+		/* pwm_div is unsigned; the check below catches underflow */
+		pwm_div--;
+
+		/*
+		 * pre_div and pwm_div values swap produces the same
+		 * result. This loop goes over all pre_div <= pwm_div
+		 * combinations. The rest are equivalent.
+		 */
+		if (pre_div > pwm_div)
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * Make sure we can do 100% duty cycle where
+		 * hi_dur == pwm_div + 1
+		 */
+		if (pwm_div > IPQ_PWM_MAX_DIV - 1)
+			continue;
+
+		diff = ((uint64_t)NSEC_PER_SEC * (pre_div + 1) * (pwm_div + 1))
+			- period_rate;
+
+		if (diff < 0) /* period larger than requested */
+			continue;
+		if (diff == 0) { /* bingo */
+			best_pre_div = pre_div;
+			best_pwm_div = pwm_div;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (diff < min_diff) {
+			min_diff = diff;
+			best_pre_div = pre_div;
+			best_pwm_div = pwm_div;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* config divider values for the closest possible frequency */
+	config_div_and_duty(pwm, best_pre_div, best_pwm_div,
+			    rate, duty_ns, state->enabled);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void ipq_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			      struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *ipq_chip = ipq_pwm_from_chip(chip);
+	unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(ipq_chip->clk);
+	unsigned int pre_div, pwm_div, hi_dur;
+	u64 effective_div, hi_div;
+	u32 reg0, reg1;
+
+	reg0 = ipq_pwm_reg_read(pwm, IPQ_PWM_REG0);
+	reg1 = ipq_pwm_reg_read(pwm, IPQ_PWM_REG1);
+
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+	state->enabled = reg1 & IPQ_PWM_REG1_ENABLE;
+
+	pwm_div = FIELD_GET(IPQ_PWM_REG0_PWM_DIV, reg0);
+	hi_dur = FIELD_GET(IPQ_PWM_REG0_HI_DURATION, reg0);
+	pre_div = FIELD_GET(IPQ_PWM_REG1_PRE_DIV, reg1);
+
+	/* No overflow here, both pre_div and pwm_div <= 0xffff */
+	effective_div = (u64)(pre_div + 1) * (pwm_div + 1);
+	state->period = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(effective_div * NSEC_PER_SEC, rate);
+
+	hi_div = hi_dur * (pre_div + 1);
+	state->duty_cycle = div64_u64(hi_div * NSEC_PER_SEC, rate);
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops ipq_pwm_ops = {
+	.apply = ipq_pwm_apply,
+	.get_state = ipq_pwm_get_state,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int ipq_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *pwm;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	pwm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pwm)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm);
+
+	pwm->mem = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(pwm->mem))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pwm->mem),
+				"regs map failed");
+
+	pwm->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pwm->clk),
+				"failed to get clock");
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "clock enable failed");
+
+	pwm->chip.dev = dev;
+	pwm->chip.ops = &ipq_pwm_ops;
+	pwm->chip.npwm = 4;
+
+	ret = pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "pwmchip_add() failed\n");
+		clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int ipq_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct ipq_pwm_chip *pwm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	pwmchip_remove(&pwm->chip);
+	clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id pwm_ipq_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pwm", },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_ipq_dt_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver ipq_pwm_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "ipq-pwm",
+		.of_match_table = pwm_ipq_dt_match,
+	},
+	.probe = ipq_pwm_probe,
+	.remove = ipq_pwm_remove,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(ipq_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
  2021-11-30 17:37 [PATCH v9 1/3] pwm: driver for qualcomm ipq6018 pwm block Baruch Siach
@ 2021-11-30 17:37 ` Baruch Siach
  2021-11-30 20:36   ` Rob Herring
  2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: add pwm node Baruch Siach
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2021-11-30 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson
  Cc: Baruch Siach, Balaji Prakash J, Rob Herring, Robert Marko,
	Kathiravan T, linux-pwm, devicetree, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-arm-kernel

DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---

v9:

  Add 'ranges' property to example (Rob)

  Drop label in example (Rob)

v8:

  Add size cell to 'reg' (Rob)

v7:

  Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)

  Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)

  Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)

  Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)

  List 'reg' as required

v6:

  Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)

  Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)

v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
    Andersson, Kathiravan T)

v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)

v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)

v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..857086ad539e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm IPQ6018 PWM controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
+
+properties:
+  "#pwm-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+  compatible:
+    const: qcom,ipq6018-pwm
+
+  reg:
+    description: Offset of PWM register in the TCSR block.
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - clocks
+  - "#pwm-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq6018.h>
+
+    syscon@1937000 {
+        compatible = "qcom,tcsr-ipq6018", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
+        reg = <0x01937000 0x21000>;
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges = <0 0x1937000 0x21000>;
+
+        pwm: pwm@a010 {
+            compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pwm";
+            reg = <0xa010 0x20>;
+            clocks = <&gcc GCC_ADSS_PWM_CLK>;
+            assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_ADSS_PWM_CLK>;
+            assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>;
+            #pwm-cells = <2>;
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v9 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: add pwm node
  2021-11-30 17:37 [PATCH v9 1/3] pwm: driver for qualcomm ipq6018 pwm block Baruch Siach
  2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding Baruch Siach
@ 2021-11-30 17:37 ` Baruch Siach
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2021-11-30 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thierry Reding, Uwe Kleine-König, Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson
  Cc: Baruch Siach, Balaji Prakash J, Rob Herring, Robert Marko,
	Kathiravan T, linux-pwm, devicetree, linux-arm-msm,
	linux-arm-kernel

Describe the PWM block on IPQ6018.

The PWM is in the TCSR area. Make &tcsr "simple-mfd" compatible, and add
&pwm as child of &tcsr.

Add also ipq6018 specific compatible string.

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
v9:

  Add 'ranges' property (Rob)

v8:

  Add size cell to 'reg' (Rob)

v7:

  Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)

  Add qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 (Rob)

  Drop clock-names (Bjorn)

v6:

  Make the PWM node child of TCSR (Rob Herring)

  Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)

v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for TCSR phandle instead of direct regs

v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
index 933b56103a46..6a22bb5f42f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
@@ -258,8 +258,21 @@ tcsr_mutex_regs: syscon@1905000 {
 		};
 
 		tcsr: syscon@1937000 {
-			compatible = "syscon";
+			compatible = "qcom,tcsr-ipq6018", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
 			reg = <0x0 0x01937000 0x0 0x21000>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x01937000 0x21000>;
+
+			pwm: pwm@a010 {
+				compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-pwm";
+				reg = <0xa010 0x20>;
+				clocks = <&gcc GCC_ADSS_PWM_CLK>;
+				assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_ADSS_PWM_CLK>;
+				assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>;
+				#pwm-cells = <2>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
 		};
 
 		blsp_dma: dma-controller@7884000 {
-- 
2.33.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
  2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding Baruch Siach
@ 2021-11-30 20:36   ` Rob Herring
  2021-12-01  4:49     ` Baruch Siach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-11-30 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baruch Siach
  Cc: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Thierry Reding,
	linux-arm-kernel, Robert Marko, linux-pwm, Uwe Kleine-König,
	devicetree, Kathiravan T, linux-arm-msm, Balaji Prakash J

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1948 bytes --]

On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:37:29 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> ---
> 
> v9:
> 
>   Add 'ranges' property to example (Rob)
> 
>   Drop label in example (Rob)
> 
> v8:
> 
>   Add size cell to 'reg' (Rob)
> 
> v7:
> 
>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
> 
>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
> 
>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
> 
>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
> 
>   List 'reg' as required
> 
> v6:
> 
>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
> 
>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
> 
> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
> 
> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
> 
> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
> 
> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1561766

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
  2021-11-30 20:36   ` Rob Herring
@ 2021-12-01  4:49     ` Baruch Siach
  2021-12-01 16:07       ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2021-12-01  4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Rob Herring, Thierry Reding,
	linux-arm-kernel, Robert Marko, linux-pwm, Uwe Kleine-König,
	devicetree, Kathiravan T, linux-arm-msm, Balaji Prakash J

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Nov 30 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:37:29 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>> ---
>> 
>> v9:
>> 
>>   Add 'ranges' property to example (Rob)
>> 
>>   Drop label in example (Rob)
>> 
>> v8:
>> 
>>   Add size cell to 'reg' (Rob)
>> 
>> v7:
>> 
>>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
>> 
>>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
>> 
>>   List 'reg' as required
>> 
>> v6:
>> 
>>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
>> 
>>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
>> 
>> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
>>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
>> 
>> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
>> 
>> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
>> 
>> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
>> 
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
> /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']

My previous submission[1] had this text above the patch changelog:

---
This series does not convert the TCSR binding documentation to YAML. As
a result, this commit adds new a dt_binding_check warning:

/example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,tcsr-ipq 6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']

If that is a blocker to IPQ6018 PWM support, so be it. Patches will wait
for someone else to push them further.
---

This time I missed the 'DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m' part so I didn't see the
error.

Thanks for the reminder,
baruch

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8238dfb5d5e4a40a995f047db36d9a7240431de5.1630323987.git.baruch@tkos.co.il/

> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1561766
>
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit.


-- 
                                                     ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
  2021-12-01  4:49     ` Baruch Siach
@ 2021-12-01 16:07       ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-12-01 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Baruch Siach
  Cc: Andy Gross, Bjorn Andersson, Thierry Reding, linux-arm-kernel,
	Robert Marko, linux-pwm, Uwe Kleine-König, devicetree,
	Kathiravan T, linux-arm-msm, Balaji Prakash J

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:55 PM Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Nov 30 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:37:29 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v9:
> >>
> >>   Add 'ranges' property to example (Rob)
> >>
> >>   Drop label in example (Rob)
> >>
> >> v8:
> >>
> >>   Add size cell to 'reg' (Rob)
> >>
> >> v7:
> >>
> >>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
> >>
> >>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
> >>
> >>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
> >>
> >>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
> >>
> >>   List 'reg' as required
> >>
> >> v6:
> >>
> >>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
> >>
> >>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
> >>
> >> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
> >>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
> >>
> >> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
> >>
> >> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
> >>
> >> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
> >> ---
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
> >>
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
> > /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> > ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']
>
> My previous submission[1] had this text above the patch changelog:
>
> ---
> This series does not convert the TCSR binding documentation to YAML. As
> a result, this commit adds new a dt_binding_check warning:
>
> /example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,tcsr-ipq 6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']
>
> If that is a blocker to IPQ6018 PWM support, so be it. Patches will wait
> for someone else to push them further.

That one looks pretty trivial to convert and there are lots of people
working on QCom stuff, so I'm going to say yes it is required.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-01 16:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-30 17:37 [PATCH v9 1/3] pwm: driver for qualcomm ipq6018 pwm block Baruch Siach
2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding Baruch Siach
2021-11-30 20:36   ` Rob Herring
2021-12-01  4:49     ` Baruch Siach
2021-12-01 16:07       ` Rob Herring
2021-11-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: add pwm node Baruch Siach

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).