From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:32:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhc4ybbt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com>
Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com> writes:
> On 3/24/20 6:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>>> commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros")
>>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729
>>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>>>
>>> in testcase: will-it-scale
>>> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>>> with following parameters:
>>
>> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator,
>> perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and
>> reordering lines may affect this.
>> Can you restore terminator there and re-test?
>>
>
> I have retested with the change, but it has no effect on the performance.
Bah. The binary equivalence testing detected this, but I obvioulsy
missed it. Delta fix below.
Thanks,
tglx
8<--------------
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2727,7 +2727,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_request_
#define X86_MATCH_HWP(model, hwp_mode) \
X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_##model, \
- X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF, hwp_mode)
+ X86_FEATURE_HWP, hwp_mode)
static const struct x86_cpu_id hwp_support_ids[] __initconst = {
X86_MATCH_HWP(BROADWELL_X, INTEL_PSTATE_HWP_BROADWELL),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200320131345.635023594@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:31 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <20200320131508.736205164@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:33 ` [patch 01/22] x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20200320131508.826011988@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:29 ` [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20200320131509.467730627@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:47 ` [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 " Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 16:38 ` mark gross
[not found] ` <20200320131509.766573641@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:52 ` [patch 11/22] platform/x86: Convert to new " Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <20200320131510.594671507@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:58 ` [patch 19/22] ASoC: Intel: Convert to new X86 " Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:59 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <20200320131509.564059710@linutronix.de>
2020-03-20 14:50 ` [patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 21:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <20200324060124.GC11705@shao2-debian>
2020-03-24 10:24 ` [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 15:38 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-25 7:51 ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25 7:50 ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25 10:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-26 8:33 ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24 13:51 ` [patch V2 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 18:58 ` [PATCH 23/22] x86/smpboot: Remove the last ICPU() macro Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20200320131509.673579000@linutronix.de>
2020-03-24 19:31 ` [patch 10/22] EDAC: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhc4ybbt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).