linux-fpga.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
To: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
Cc: mdf@kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, trix@redhat.com,
	lgoncalv@redhat.com, hao.wu@intel.com, matthew.gerlach@intel.com,
	richard.gong@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] fpga: bridge: Use standard dev_release for class driver
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 23:58:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210609155817.GD1994229@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609004925.238044-5-russell.h.weight@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:49:24PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote:
> The FPGA bridge class driver data structure is being treated as a managed
> resource instead of using standard dev_release call-back to release the
> class data structure. This change populates the class.dev_release function
> and changes the fpga_bridge_free() function to call put_device(). It also
> changes fpga_bridge_unregister() to call device_del() instead of
> device_unregister().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> index 05c6d4f2d043..59f40f26035d 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fpga_bridge);
>  
>  /**
>   * fpga_bridge_create - create and initialize a struct fpga_bridge
> - * @dev:	FPGA bridge device from pdev
> + * @parent:	FPGA bridge device from pdev

The same concern, split the rename changes out.

>   * @name:	FPGA bridge name
>   * @br_ops:	pointer to structure of fpga bridge ops
>   * @priv:	FPGA bridge private data
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fpga_bridge);
>   *
>   * Return: struct fpga_bridge or NULL
>   */
> -struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_create(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> +struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_create(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>  				       const struct fpga_bridge_ops *br_ops,
>  				       void *priv)
>  {
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_create(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	int id, ret;
>  
>  	if (!name || !strlen(name)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Attempt to register with no name!\n");
> +		dev_err(parent, "Attempt to register with no name!\n");
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -340,8 +340,10 @@ struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_create(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	id = ida_simple_get(&fpga_bridge_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (id < 0)
> -		goto error_kfree;
> +	if (id < 0) {
> +		kfree(bridge);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	mutex_init(&bridge->mutex);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bridge->node);
> @@ -353,22 +355,17 @@ struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_create(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	device_initialize(&bridge->dev);
>  	bridge->dev.groups = br_ops->groups;
>  	bridge->dev.class = fpga_bridge_class;
> -	bridge->dev.parent = dev;
> -	bridge->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> +	bridge->dev.parent = parent;
> +	bridge->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
>  	bridge->dev.id = id;
>  
>  	ret = dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "br%d", id);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto error_device;
> +	if (ret) {
> +		put_device(&bridge->dev);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	return bridge;
> -
> -error_device:
> -	ida_simple_remove(&fpga_bridge_ida, id);
> -error_kfree:
> -	kfree(bridge);
> -
> -	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_create);
>  
> @@ -378,8 +375,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_create);
>   */
>  void fpga_bridge_free(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
>  {
> -	ida_simple_remove(&fpga_bridge_ida, bridge->dev.id);
> -	kfree(bridge);
> +	put_device(&bridge->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_free);
>  
> @@ -387,12 +383,12 @@ static void devm_fpga_bridge_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
>  {
>  	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = *(struct fpga_bridge **)res;
>  
> -	fpga_bridge_free(bridge);
> +	put_device(&bridge->dev);

The same concern, I prefer to keep it unchanged.

Thanks,
Yilun

>  }
>  
>  /**
>   * devm_fpga_bridge_create - create and init a managed struct fpga_bridge
> - * @dev:	FPGA bridge device from pdev
> + * @parent:	FPGA bridge device from pdev
>   * @name:	FPGA bridge name
>   * @br_ops:	pointer to structure of fpga bridge ops
>   * @priv:	FPGA bridge private data
> @@ -408,7 +404,7 @@ static void devm_fpga_bridge_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
>   *  Return: struct fpga_bridge or NULL
>   */
>  struct fpga_bridge
> -*devm_fpga_bridge_create(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> +*devm_fpga_bridge_create(struct device *parent, const char *name,
>  			 const struct fpga_bridge_ops *br_ops, void *priv)
>  {
>  	struct fpga_bridge **ptr, *bridge;
> @@ -417,12 +413,12 @@ struct fpga_bridge
>  	if (!ptr)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	bridge = fpga_bridge_create(dev, name, br_ops, priv);
> +	bridge = fpga_bridge_create(parent, name, br_ops, priv);
>  	if (!bridge) {
>  		devres_free(ptr);
>  	} else {
>  		*ptr = bridge;
> -		devres_add(dev, ptr);
> +		devres_add(parent, ptr);
>  	}
>  
>  	return bridge;
> @@ -469,12 +465,16 @@ void fpga_bridge_unregister(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
>  	if (bridge->br_ops && bridge->br_ops->fpga_bridge_remove)
>  		bridge->br_ops->fpga_bridge_remove(bridge);
>  
> -	device_unregister(&bridge->dev);
> +	device_del(&bridge->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_unregister);
>  
>  static void fpga_bridge_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
> +
> +	ida_simple_remove(&fpga_bridge_ida, bridge->dev.id);
> +	kfree(bridge);
>  }
>  
>  static int __init fpga_bridge_dev_init(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09  0:49 [PATCH v1 0/5] fpga: Populate dev_release functions Russ Weight
2021-06-09  0:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] fpga: mgr: Use standard dev_release for class driver Russ Weight
2021-06-09 15:28   ` Xu Yilun
2021-06-09 15:57     ` Russ Weight
2021-06-09  0:49 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] fpga: altera-pr-ip: Remove fpga_mgr_unregister() call Russ Weight
2021-06-09 15:37   ` Xu Yilun
2021-06-09 16:25     ` Russ Weight
2021-06-09 16:45       ` Moritz Fischer
2021-06-09  0:49 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] fpga: stratix10-soc: Add missing fpga_mgr_free() call Russ Weight
2021-06-09 15:50   ` Xu Yilun
2021-06-09  0:49 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] fpga: bridge: Use standard dev_release for class driver Russ Weight
2021-06-09 15:58   ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2021-06-09  0:49 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] fpga: region: " Russ Weight
2021-06-09 16:01   ` Xu Yilun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210609155817.GD1994229@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
    --to=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@intel.com \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
    --cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).