From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] fpga: dfl: pci: Use pci_find_vsec_capability() when looking for DFL
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:27:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39ac1f40-66ab-6c7e-0042-8fcdc062ed00@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYq4fSRoyzFE4Vei@smile.fi.intel.com>
On 11/9/21 10:05 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 07:55:43AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 11/9/21 7:41 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Currently the find_dfls_by_vsec() opens code pci_find_vsec_capability().
>>> Refactor the former to use the latter. No functional change intended.
> Thanks for review, my answers below.
>
> ...
>
>>> + u16 voff;
>> The later use of voff in pci_read_config_dword is of type 'int', it may be
>> better to keep voff as an int.
> I don't think so. The rule of thumb that the types should match the value they
> got in the first place. In this case it's u16. Compiler will implicitly cast it
> to whatever is needed as long as the type is good for integer promotion.
>
> ...
>
>>> + voff = pci_find_vsec_capability(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_VSEC_ID_INTEL_DFLS);
>> This may be a weakness in the origin code, but intel isn't the exclusive
>> user of DFL.
> This does not change the original code. If you think so, this can be extended
> later on.
I would rather see this fixed now or explained why this isn't a problem.
Tom
>
>>> if (!voff) {
>>> dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "%s no DFL VSEC found\n", __func__);
>>> return -ENODEV;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-09 15:41 [PATCH v1 1/1] fpga: dfl: pci: Use pci_find_vsec_capability() when looking for DFL Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-09 15:55 ` Tom Rix
2021-11-09 18:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-09 18:27 ` Tom Rix [this message]
2021-11-09 18:51 ` matthew.gerlach
2021-11-10 3:44 ` Xu Yilun
2021-11-10 3:51 ` Wu, Hao
2021-11-10 8:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-10 12:27 ` Tom Rix
2021-11-10 16:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-03 11:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-03 15:10 ` Xu Yilun
2024-04-03 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-12 4:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-13 6:47 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-15 6:39 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39ac1f40-66ab-6c7e-0042-8fcdc062ed00@redhat.com \
--to=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).