[PATCH] fs: proc: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t

[PATCH] fs: proc: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t

[Souptick Joarder]

Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler.

Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/proc/vmcore.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
index a45f0af..7243e94 100644
--- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static ssize_t read_vmcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
  * On s390 the fault handler is used for memory regions that can't be mapped
  * directly with remap_pfn_range().
  */
-static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+static vm_fault_t mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_S390
 	struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] fs: proc: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t

[Souptick Joarder]

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/vmcore.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> index a45f0af..7243e94 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static ssize_t read_vmcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
>   * On s390 the fault handler is used for memory regions that can't be mapped
>   * directly with remap_pfn_range().
>   */
> -static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +static vm_fault_t mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_S390
>         struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> --
> 1.9.1
>

Any comment on this patch ? We would like to get this patch in
queue for 4.18.

Re: [PATCH] fs: proc: Adding new typedef vm_fault_t

[Souptick Joarder]

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:46 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/proc/vmcore.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index a45f0af..7243e94 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static ssize_t read_vmcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
>>   * On s390 the fault handler is used for memory regions that can't be mapped
>>   * directly with remap_pfn_range().
>>   */
>> -static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> +static vm_fault_t mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>  {
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_S390
>>         struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Any comment on this patch ? We would like to get this patch in
> queue for 4.18.

If no comment, we would like to get this patch in queue
for 4.18.