linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] fsnotify: optimize away srcu_read_lock() for events on directories
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:09:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181004090916.GC11529@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181003212539.2384-9-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Thu 04-10-18 00:25:39, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> inotify and dnotify are always interested in events on directories.
> fanotify is interested in events on directories only if user requested
> them by flag FAN_ONDIR.
> 
> For the fanotify supported events on directories (open/access/close),
> if there is no inotify/dnotify associated marks and if none of the
> associated fanotify marks have the FS_ISDIR flag, we can skip iterating
> the marks and we avoid taking the srcu_read_lock() for all events on
> directories.
> 
> In order to enable this check in fsnotify() we set the FS_ISDIR flag
> explicitly on all dnotify/inotify marks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c      | 5 +++--
>  fs/notify/fsnotify.c             | 9 ++++++++-
>  fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Looks good, except I think you forgot to convert kernel/audit_watch.c and
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c which also need to set FS_ISDIR...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 21:25 [PATCH v3 0/8] New fanotify event info API Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] fanotify: fix collision of internal and uapi mark flags Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] fsnotify: generalize handling of extra event flags Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] fanotify: simplify handling of FAN_ONDIR Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] fanotify: deprecate uapi FAN_ALL_* constants Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] fsnotify: convert runtime BUG_ON() to BUILD_BUG_ON() Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] fanotify: add BUILD_BUG_ON() to count the bits of fanotify constants Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  8:41   ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 10:24     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] fanotify: support reporting thread id instead of process id Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  8:46   ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 10:27     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-11 10:16   ` Jan Kara
2018-10-12  2:43     ` Nixiaoming
2018-10-16 12:06       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-03 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] fsnotify: optimize away srcu_read_lock() for events on directories Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04  9:09   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-10-04 10:30     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-04 11:26       ` Jan Kara
2018-10-04 22:05         ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181004090916.GC11529@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).