From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (repost)] umh: fix refcount underflow in fork_usermode_blob().
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:55:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200328175512.e89ff65333e6c65fea211c12@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b846b1f-a231-4f09-8c37-6bfb0d1e7b05@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:51:34 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Since free_bprm(bprm) always calls allow_write_access(bprm->file) and
> fput(bprm->file) if bprm->file is set to non-NULL, __do_execve_file()
> must call deny_write_access(file) and get_file(file) if called from
> do_execve_file() path. Otherwise, use-after-free access can happen at
> fput(file) in fork_usermode_blob().
>
> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> CPU: 3 PID: 4131 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 5.6.0-rc5+ #978
> Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/29/2019
> RIP: 0010:fork_usermode_blob+0xaa/0x190
This is rather old code - what casued this to be observed now? Some
unusual userspace behaviour?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-29 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-12 13:43 [PATCH] umh: fix refcount underflow in fork_usermode_blob() Tetsuo Handa
2020-03-12 14:38 ` Al Viro
2020-03-13 9:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-03-20 10:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-03-27 0:51 ` [PATCH (repost)] " Tetsuo Handa
2020-03-29 0:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-03-29 4:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-03-29 3:17 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200328175512.e89ff65333e6c65fea211c12@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).