linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Fsnotify cleanups
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 20:49:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjmRHS_6guXTk=c4XswZ+MQvzL+gqdm7ON4TCKc6TbweA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxj9EU+CTveKqQN1QDHAC-to6aS7uKUkfr_+pk3S_riHaA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:57 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We embed fsnotify_obj in struct inode and fsnotify_obj_mask in struct mount.
>>
>> So I'd *really* like to see just a pointer, not an embedded struct.
>>
>> Yes, if you get rid of the mask from the embedded struct (so that it
>> only contains a pointer), you do get rid of the odd alignment issues
>> and the need for "packed".
>>
>> But from previous experience, once you embed a structure, that
>> structure tends to grow. Because it can, and it's so convenient.
>> Suddently it has a spinlock in it too etc.
>>
>
> Fair enough.
>
>> So if you can make do with just the pointer, it would actually be
>> nicer to expose it as such. Then you can also avoid the header file
>> dependency chain, because you can just pre-declare the structure (like
>> it does now) and
>>
>>     struct fsnotify_mark_connector;
>>     ..
>>         struct fsnotify_mark_connector __rcu    *i_fsnotify_marks;
>>
>> in the inode. That way the core header files don't need to worry about
>> the fsnotify details, and don't need to include fsnotify headers.
>>
>> And we can do inode packing without having to know (not that it
>> happens all that often - everybody would *love* to shrink the inode
>> structure, but it's just hard. Because everybody also wants to put
>> their own data into the inode ..)
>>
>> Can't the generalization code just take a pointer to a __rcu pointer
>> to fsnotify_mark_connector, obviating the need for the fsnotify_obj
>> structure definition?
>>
>

Jan,

I reworked the cleanup patches to get rid of fsnotify_obj and pushed to:
https://github.com/amir73il/linux.git fsnotify-cleanup

Only last 5 patches from fsnotify_for_v4.18-rc1 have been modified
and I removed your S-O-B from the modified patches.

This leaves struct inode unchanged, in fact no changes to code outside
fsnotify/audit at all.

mask is now a member of connector for the purpose of generalizing
add/remove mark, but struct inode/mount still have a copy of the mask
for the purpose of the VFS optimizations.

I have a POC patch that removes mask from struct inode and
uses 2 bits in connector pointer for VFS optimizations, but that patch
requires more testing, so for another time.

Thanks,
Amir.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-10 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-07 15:02 [GIT PULL] Fsnotify cleanups Jan Kara
2018-06-07 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-08 13:27   ` Jan Kara
2018-06-08 20:34     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-09  6:57       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-09  8:00         ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-11 16:12           ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 16:31             ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-09 17:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-06-09 18:46           ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-10 17:49             ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-06-11 13:36               ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 13:58                 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-11 16:03                   ` Jan Kara
2018-06-11 16:38                     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-11 19:51                       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-13 13:21                         ` Jan Kara
2018-06-13 13:56                           ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-13 22:17                             ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-22 16:44                               ` Jan Kara
2018-06-23  7:42                                 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-11 11:08       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxjmRHS_6guXTk=c4XswZ+MQvzL+gqdm7ON4TCKc6TbweA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).