From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Marcel Gudert <m.gudert@eckelmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: pca953x: fix handling of automatic address incrementing
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:15:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414101545.2bmzlid7c7aosbs6@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331100759.GE1922688@smile.fi.intel.com>
Hello,
obviously I failed to Cc: the gpio maintainers. Should I resend because
of that?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 01:07:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:50:17PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > The history of this bug is a bit complicated. Commit b32cecb46bdc
> > ("gpio: pca953x: Extract the register address mangling to single
> > function") changed which chips and functions are affected. Commit
> > 3b00691cc46a ("gpio: pca953x: hack to fix 24 bit gpio expanders") used
> > some duct tape to make the driver at least appear to work. Commit
> > 49427232764d ("gpio: pca953x: Perform basic regmap conversion")
> > introduced the caching. Commit b4818afeacbd ("gpio: pca953x: Add
> > set_multiple to allow multiple bits to be set in one write.") introduced
> > the .set_multiple() callback which didn't work for chips that need the
> > AI bit which was fixed later for some chips in 8958262af3fb ("gpio:
> > pca953x: Repair multi-byte IO address increment on PCA9575"). So I'm
> > sorry, I don't know which commit I should pick for a Fixes: line.
>
> It's allowed to put more, but I rather utilize Depends-on for that.
>
> So, something like
>
> Fixes: b4818afeacbd ...
> Depends-on: 8958262af3fb ...
I don't know what is best here. Using
Fixes: b4818afeacbd ("gpio: pca953x: Add set_multiple to allow multiple bits to be set in one write.")
seems sensible. Not sure which commits are sensible to list in
Depends-on lines. I tend to just don't list any and then backport on
request of the stable maintainers iff and when application to older
versions failed.
Linus/Bartosz: Do you care for application of the tags according to your
taste?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-30 19:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: pca953x: fix handling of automatic address incrementing Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-30 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-31 10:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-31 10:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-14 10:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2020-04-14 13:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-30 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: pca953x: drop unused parameters of pca953x_recalc_addr() Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-31 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: pca953x: fix handling of automatic address incrementing Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200414101545.2bmzlid7c7aosbs6@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.gudert@eckelmann.de \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).