linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
	Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
	Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:16:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e11f2eb7af3dc53b98c97b531686162a@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbrw7Hjt9mB9pr_iNsGi71g_d8BGhpT_ih1RVgKJ5U0qQ@mail.gmail.com>

Am 2022-04-18 01:41, schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 9:47 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
> 
>> Convert the ocelot-pinctrl device tree binding to the new YAML format.
>> 
>> Additionally to the original binding documentation, add interrupt
>> properties which are optional and already used on several SoCs like
>> SparX-5, Luton, Ocelot and LAN966x but were not documented before.
>> 
>> Also, on the sparx5 and the lan966x SoCs there are two items for the
>> reg property.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> 
> So is this single patch something I should apply to the pin control 
> tree?

The first five patches will fix the validation errrors once the
binding is converted to the YAML format. So, do they need to go
through the same tree?

Also as mentioned, there is this pending series [1] which is the
reason I've converted the binding to YAML in the first place. So
at least the first patch of this series will have to go through
the same tree as the YAML conversion patch.

How can we move forward here? Krzysztof, maybe all of the dt
bindings patches can go through your tree and I'll reposting
the second patch of [1] afterwards?

-michael

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220313154640.63813-1-michael@walle.cc/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-19 20:46 [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: ocelot: convert to YAML format Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] MIPS: mscc: jaguar2: rename pinctrl nodes Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] MIPS: mscc: ocelot: " Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] MIPS: mscc: serval: " Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: dts: sparx5: " Michael Walle
2023-05-17 12:23   ` (subset) " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: dts: lan966x: " Michael Walle
2022-05-17 14:36   ` Nicolas Ferre
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format Michael Walle
2022-03-20 10:54   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-20 11:08     ` Michael Walle
2022-03-20 11:17       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-17 23:41   ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-18  8:16     ` Michael Walle [this message]
2022-04-18  8:19     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-18 11:13       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-18 12:04         ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 22:33           ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-04 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: ocelot: convert " Michael Walle
2022-04-19 22:28 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e11f2eb7af3dc53b98c97b531686162a@walle.cc \
    --to=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).