Linux-i2c Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: I2C_HISI should depend on ARCH_HISI && ACPI
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:02:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVu4VRgJzfM=P8OBi55rsCMFB1vmSepTvSyv1DLjw9Vcw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcFjRBO+0578jWam3+sc24KvKArTtQV+nRCCbV1E++Nsg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:50 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:06:18PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:24 AM Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > I guess it's still fine to add a dependency on ACPI?
> > > > >
> > > > > But why?
> > > >
> > > > Please tell me how/when the driver is used when CONFIG_ACPI=n.
> > >
> > > I'm not using it at all. Ask the author :-)
> > >
> > > But if we follow your logic, then we need to mark all the _platform_ drivers
> > > for x86 world as ACPI dependent? This sounds ugly.
> >
> > Do all other x86 platform drivers have (1) an .acpi_match_table[] and
> > (2) no other way of instantiating their devices?
> > The first driver from the top of my memory I looked at is rtc-cmos:
> > it has no .acpi_match_table[], and the rtc-cmos device is instantiated
> > from arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c.
> >
> > For drivers with only an .of_match_table(), and no legacy users
> > instantiating platform devices, we do have dependencies on OF.
>
> This is not true. Entire IIO subsystem is an example.

Do you care to elaborate?
Three quarters of the IIO drivers are I2C and SPI drivers, and thus not
subject to the above.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply index

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13 12:26 Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-13 12:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-13 12:48   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-13 14:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-13 14:44       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-13 15:19         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-14  9:19 ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-14 18:06   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 18:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-14 18:55       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-14 19:14         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-14 19:21           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-15  8:50             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-19 13:02               ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2021-04-19 13:31                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-19 13:54                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-19 13:58                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-19 14:14                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-19 14:18                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-19 14:27                           ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-19 14:15                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-04-19 14:39                         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-04-15  8:18     ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-15  9:04       ` Yicong Yang
2021-04-15 10:36         ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdVu4VRgJzfM=P8OBi55rsCMFB1vmSepTvSyv1DLjw9Vcw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-i2c Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/0 linux-i2c/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-i2c linux-i2c/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c \
		linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-i2c

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git